Elements Of Contractarianism

Improved Essays
CONTRACTARIANISM
INTRODUCTION
“Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com)
“Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority.
Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian
…show more content…
ELEMENTS OF CONTRACTARIANISM
Contractarianism/social contract has two fundamental elements; the first is state of nature this as explained by Hobbes is a situation in which there’s no government and no central authority, human beings endeavor desperately to fulfill their desires for food, clothing, shelter, power, honor, glory, comfort, pleasure, and a life of ease. This leads to self-preservation which includes justification of use of force and fraud to defend oneself,
Hobbes concluded that human beings, in a state of nature, would be engaged in a fierce struggle over scarce resources. Individuals would attack, steal, destroy and invade to protect themselves and prove their status. Thus, the state of nature is a state of war. But this state is to our survival and so the desire for self-preservation expressed itself in another way which was fear of death and the desire for a good life inclined everyone toward
…show more content…
They could be masochists! However, such individuals are in the minority. And there are other ways to justify non-self-interested actions to people. Religious, political, and familial institutions as well as a number of philosophical arguments have tried to convince persons to forego their self-interest for some greater good. Nevertheless, this has always been a difficult if not impossible task and, on the whole, not very successful. Consider how difficult it is even with an enforcement agency in place to prevent individuals from pursuing their self-interest. People cheat on their taxes even with enforcement in place! Perhaps morality would have a more firm foundation if one could demonstrate to all individuals that moral rules are in their self-interest. If moral rules cannot satisfy this requirement, then we have no reason to follow them. This emphasis on harnessing, rather than repressing, the self-interested behavior is the hallmark of the contractarian

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that if you simply do what you are told, you are safe. You will not violate the social contract because you do not have the right to…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Can moral agents do what stands in their own self-interest and still perform with a voluntary spirit? Lori A. Brainard and Patricia D. Siplon, in their work, Toward Nonprofit Organization Reform in The Voluntary Spirit quoted Richard Bush, as he cautioned, “that one of the biggest challenges facing organizations in the sector was how to retain their “nonprofit spirit in a for profit world.” Accordingly, in your discussion board submission, you separated “a different value and mode of using their resources than most for-profit companies.” However, egoism and altruism can melt together developing, a more nuanced social type of motivation that incorporates both self-interest and concern for others at the same time.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They all conclude that the state of nature at one point or another becomes that of war, thus leading individuals to want to come together to find a common state and even peace, resulting in our leaving from the sate of nature. Social Contract Through Hobbes’,…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Policy Changes

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed that with social contract anyone can have anything such as taking someone’s life or taking away someone’s property which can cause conflict and war. Hobbes claimed that if you cannot have peace then you have to practice for war. According to Hobbes, “From this fundamental law of Nature, by which men are commanded to endeavour peace, is derived this second law, “that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far-forth, as for peace, and defence of himself he shall think it necessary…””. In…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates asks an interesting question which is; “[W]hy should we pay so much attention to what “most people” think?” -Socrates, In Plato's Crito (CA. 390 B.C.). Although, Socrates wasn't widely liked he debated long and deeply before ultimately making his decision to die or not. He believed that the state would be destroyed if people did not obey laws.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract Theory: Stranded after an airplane crash. The Social Contract Theory states “We are all by nature largely, or entirely, self-interested. What we want is power over others, physical security, plenty of money and sensual pleasure.” (pg. 194).…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will argue that act consequentialism is the most plausible moral theory because it better summarizes my thought process when making a decision. Act consequentialism is interchangeably used with classical act utilitarianism. This theory states that you ought to do whatever will produce the best (or least bad) overall consequences. Some phrases an act consequentialist would use is “The greatest good for the greatest number” or “The ends justify the means”. These phrases just emphasize that as long as the end results maximize the best consequences, then you should do what requires you to get those results.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It proves to be very difficult to implore people to live together harmoniously without having to care for one another a certain degree. However, no contractarian bargainer would agree to complete altruism. Using rational thought, bargainers could conclude that it is easier to accomplish tasks with help from multiple people as opposed to just one person. Contractarian bargainers agree to communal living and, if needed, helping others so long as it will lead to them being able to maximize their own utility. To that end, the social contracts allow for humans to be egoistic so long as it allows for individuals to cooperate with other contractarian…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With that being said, it is society’s right to overthrow the government whenever they have evidence to do so. Locke’s idea of a social contract was very different than Hobbes’. According to Locke, life in the state of nature was filled with “peace, goodwill, mutual assistance, and preservation.” Locke strongly believed that because people were naturally moral, in a social contract, no competition or harm would be an issue.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All forms of social contract theory ultimately come down to one idea, that being that the individual desire for security and safety, demands fulfillment through a collective agreement. This collective agreement transforms the unaltered human state from the natural, primal state into an organized society. Beginning with Thomas Hobbes, with perhaps the most pessimistic view on the social contract and why it came about. According to Hobbes prior to Social Contract, man lived in the State of Nature. Man’s life in the State of nature was one of fear and selfishness, a chaotic condition of constant fear.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two writings, On the State of Nature by Thomas Hobbes, and Lord of the Flies by William Golding are two very intellectual ways of thinking. The two writings have some different viewpoints and understandings. Although there are some differences between both writings, the basis of their writings are focused around the idea that politics, and laws are formed from a social contract. Social contracts are a form of government when no government is officially appointed, leaving the decision of who should be in power up to the people. Thomas Hobbes stated, “Hereby it is manifest, that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Framework Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that I feel aligned to personally. Utilitarianism states that the ethical choice is the one that provides the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, even if that choice isn’t the best for everyone. Much of our politics are conducted using this approach, making decisions and laws that increase the amount of good while also reducing the amount of harm that is done. I believe this to be the most practical approach to most situations, especially when it comes to government. This is because it is virtually impossible to meet the needs or wants of every single person, so doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people is ultimately what is best for the community.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Theory is an agreement between the people and the government that the people will obey the government as long as the government serves in a capacity that protects the rights of the people and furthers the good for the general will. Before we consent, we exist in the state of nature. In the state of nature, we follow natural law. Natural law comes from God. Natural law gives us our natural rights, which we are promised because of our personhood.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to judge a situation using Social Contract theory, we have to understand a few principles behind the theory first. These include the Social Contract, John Rawl 's Principle of Justice, and the Difference Principle. Using these three ideas, we can determine what constitutes a community of people, what makes a moral rule correct, and which correct moral rules would be accepted by a community of people. The Social Contract is this idea that when people come together to form a community, moral rules must be agreed upon that benefit everyone in the community. Not only that, but the Social Contract needs some kind of established governing body to enforce the agreed upon rules.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays