This introduces the second type of evidence of God’s existence. For the last 250 years, Darwinists have stated that evolution replaces God. Evolution only explains from when you actually have life, but does not explain where life came from. Darwin never states, he proclaims that lightning struck into a pool of energy and wallah a human being. After reviewing his own theory he states, “Nature non facit saltum.”(126) this means Nature cannot jump (Schwabe). Philosophers proclaim that if you can imagine the 3.8 Billion years that many say life has existed as one day, in just 90 seconds most creatures would appear instantly. Nature cannot jump becomes nature makes a giant leap, this voids philosophies denying of God’s existence. Even hawking states, “Philosophy is …show more content…
This introduces the final argument which is morality. It is only right when opposing atheism to theism, it would be justifiable not to jump to any conclusion that God does not exist. If God does not exist, good or bad doesn't matter, if you are a doctor or a terrorist. If there is no God, it does not matter, whether you donate organs or are an abortionist. Atheist only do what’s right because its right, but if there is no existing God to prove if you're morally correct, then nothing makes it right. On the other hand, Christians obey the Ten Commandments because they're afraid if they don't they will be punished. With that being said, mankind is made up of many rights and wrongs. Every single human being, has the sense that they are obligated to avoid evil and to do well. There is a moral imperative that comes from somewhere, which is universal unlike some culturally shaped moralities. This universal imperative leads to something much bigger than