The Wolf of Wall Street does not provide a serious indictment to Belfort’s unlawful pump and dump scam (Gilbey). Some critics, like The Observer's chief film critic Mark Kermode, accuse the film of ignoring victims that suffered in Stratton Oakmont’s scam, “[they] remain as absent from the screen as they were from Belfort's venal mind” (Kermode). Indeed, most of the casualty of Belfort’s boiler room are regular Joes, who gave in to either the eloquent tongues or the high-pressure sales tactics of stockbrokers. Although the movie only tells Belfort’s side of the story, and does not clearly depict the damage his scam caused, some audiences with high standards of ethics cannot help but reject Belfort’s seduction, because they may believe that Belfort’s unethical business and his excessive consumptions are morally wrong. This type of people may not be joining the wolves in their hunt for cash, but they are also not sufferers of their
The Wolf of Wall Street does not provide a serious indictment to Belfort’s unlawful pump and dump scam (Gilbey). Some critics, like The Observer's chief film critic Mark Kermode, accuse the film of ignoring victims that suffered in Stratton Oakmont’s scam, “[they] remain as absent from the screen as they were from Belfort's venal mind” (Kermode). Indeed, most of the casualty of Belfort’s boiler room are regular Joes, who gave in to either the eloquent tongues or the high-pressure sales tactics of stockbrokers. Although the movie only tells Belfort’s side of the story, and does not clearly depict the damage his scam caused, some audiences with high standards of ethics cannot help but reject Belfort’s seduction, because they may believe that Belfort’s unethical business and his excessive consumptions are morally wrong. This type of people may not be joining the wolves in their hunt for cash, but they are also not sufferers of their