However, photographs of the event prove that the soldier was wearing a helmet, even though all the journalist could see, even with evidence to contradict it, twenty seven years later was still a soldier in a red beret. This example is used to try to discredit the memory of the human mind, but let me challenge the author to think about a different aspect of this; and that is, in short, does the soldier having a red beret or a helmet change the meaning or truth of what happened that day during the protest? In the sense that, when say compared to the Holocaust, take the eye witness account of two different Jews in the same room when being taken by German soldiers. The first Jew recounts that the soldiers grabbed their arm, and loaded them onto a blue truck that took them to the Gestapo and checked them in, which has German documental evidence to prove it. The second Jew recounts that the soldiers grabbed their arm, stumbled and was loaded onto a black truck that took them to the Gestapo and checked them in, which has German documental evidence to prove it. While the first Jew recalls a blue truck, and the second Jew recalls a black truck, those are minor detail divergencies that don’t change the over picture that they were taken to the Gestapo, and checked in. The biggest event of the example is not changed by one person remembering one small occurrence, and another remembering a different small occurrence, but is kept consistent because both Jews can recount and have evidence for the fact that the most important event, them
However, photographs of the event prove that the soldier was wearing a helmet, even though all the journalist could see, even with evidence to contradict it, twenty seven years later was still a soldier in a red beret. This example is used to try to discredit the memory of the human mind, but let me challenge the author to think about a different aspect of this; and that is, in short, does the soldier having a red beret or a helmet change the meaning or truth of what happened that day during the protest? In the sense that, when say compared to the Holocaust, take the eye witness account of two different Jews in the same room when being taken by German soldiers. The first Jew recounts that the soldiers grabbed their arm, and loaded them onto a blue truck that took them to the Gestapo and checked them in, which has German documental evidence to prove it. The second Jew recounts that the soldiers grabbed their arm, stumbled and was loaded onto a black truck that took them to the Gestapo and checked them in, which has German documental evidence to prove it. While the first Jew recalls a blue truck, and the second Jew recalls a black truck, those are minor detail divergencies that don’t change the over picture that they were taken to the Gestapo, and checked in. The biggest event of the example is not changed by one person remembering one small occurrence, and another remembering a different small occurrence, but is kept consistent because both Jews can recount and have evidence for the fact that the most important event, them