The Gospel Truth Analysis

Great Essays
In order to uncover unknown information from an ancient civilization, archeologists usually do extensive digging and research in a specified area; however, to uncover truths about Jesus Christ, there was no removal of dirt, as the world 's most sold book was dug into. Although Christianity continues to be the most popular religion, scholars came together in a Seminar, seeking to find the provable truth, which leads to unpopular conclusions. Throughout the article entitled, The Gospel Truth? by David Van Biema, the question of Jesus and the two lenses through which we see him, faith and history, are explored, conclusions are made, and reactions are instant. Instead of believing by faith and tradition, the Jesus Seminar is an attempt to identify …show more content…
Following this up, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are deemed unreliable, and the reputable nature of the Nativity, the Resurrection, the Sermon on the Mount and many other cases are immediately thrown out as unverifiable. On the matter of Judas Iscariot, some people felt the evidence proves he is guilty, some felt he did it with the Apostles as accomplices, while others felt it was simply a literary device. In consensus, the 50 panelists agreed that is was highly unlikely that he kissed his master and betrayed him to the authorities to be crucified for a mere 30 pieces of silver. I do not like this argument because they too easily assume something is false if it is not easily verified by an outside source. Also, the people are valuing their own opinions too highly, and seem to have underscoring motivations to determine the illegitimacy of the Bible. In reply to Judas Iscariot, I believe the 30 pieces of silver are irrelevant because of different temptations he must have been facing. Overall, their claims of unreliability are too rushed, and their expectations of finding evidence to support biblical claims are too high in relation to how long ago these events …show more content…
In reaction to the bold statements, many became uncomfortable and began to share their thoughts. Outraged by the supposed findings, Luke Timothy Johnson publicized his reaction again. "People have no idea how fraudulent people who claim to be scholars can be," said Johnson in an effort to discredit their work. He considers the findings to be dangerous because "Americans generally have an abysmal level of knowledge of the Bible. In this world of mass ignorance, to have headlines proclaim that this or that fact about [Jesus] has been declared untrue by supposedly scientific inquiry has the effect of the gospel. There is no basis on which most people can counter these authoritative-sounding statements." Additionally, he finds the Seminar wildly unrepresentative of scholarly consensus on the New Testament, and accuses the group of being "self-selected" not on grounds of quality of scholarship, but on prior agreements on a goal to discover a Jesus devoid of anything "mythical" or concerned with the actual possibility of a world to come. Even though it is impossible to prove any of the Gospels false, so little of it can be historically proved to be true. Johnson also maintains that the Resurrection is an ongoing miracle, a "transforming, transcendent personal power" that moves by way of the Holy Spirit in the hearts and among the communities of believers. "Christianity has never been

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I could care less if it existed 10 billion years ago or yesterday. Probably due to laziness to study or lack of interest in this particular science. Even Christians describe this attitude as ignorant and provide a plethora of scriptures proving God wants us to be knowledgeable and not ignorant. Some quickly lash out at me with Hosea 6:9, about God’s people being destroyed for lack of knowledge. However, this is the same stance I take on debates concerning the ten commandments and the ‘race’ of Jesus.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He starts each chapter with the myth, continuing with Truth as instructed within Scripture or in history, depending on the myth. McFarland deals with myths like: bigoted and unloving Christianity, it has been disproved by science, Christianity is not a belief for the intelligent, and it is not true because it has not worked for me. The writer clarifies that there is a difference between the God we identify with and the God of the Bible. He says that we have been misinformed or taught only half the truth. There have been many misleading teaching through the centuries.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, by doing so, ecclesiastics had to build a complex argumentation to avoid mention the principle of the Devil and became lost in it, creating more confusion than clarification. Additionally, it meant that God was now responsible for evil, a theory that thinkers had been trying to discredit since the beginning of the religion. Despite all their efforts to maintain Christianity afloat, it just could not be done, skeptics soon had the upper hand and Satan bite the dust; the Devil suffered the blunt of the attacks as people began to think that evil came directly from humanity and not from an external source tempting the…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harris argues that Christians do not look at the Bible in a wholistic way, but rather “[p]eople have been cherry-picking the Bible for millennia to justify their every impulse, moral and otherwise” (Harris 18). This issue specifically made me uncomfortable as I did not have an instant response to back up Christianity; frankly, it terrified me. Second, the topic of morality caught me. Harris argues Christians’ obsession of morality dominates the actual issue of human suffering. “At this very moment, millions of sentient people are suffering unimaginable physical and mental afflictions, in circumstances where the compassion of God is nowhere to be seen, and the compassion of human beings is often hobbled by preposterous ideas about sin and salvation” (Harris 37).…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bible is a piece of literature, full of characters who are mentioned to tell stories, or to make a point, but Peter always seemed real. Peter was flawed, prideful, and often quick to be wrong. He lost his temper at times, expected things from Jesus when he had no reason to, doubted Him, and later denied Him after swearing that he never would. As much as every Christian would like to claim that they are the perfect example of a follower of Christ, for most of them, that just isn’t the case. Humans are endowed with free will and original sin, passed down from Eden, and that means bad choices will doubtlessly be…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the words of Josh Mcdowell, “Jesus claimed to be God. He didn 't leave any other option open. His claim must be either true or false, so it is something that should be given serious consideration.” (McDowell) Another opinion is that Jesus never existed at all. Where this one is not quite as prevalent, mostly because There is so much reputable historical proof other than the bible that He existed. One of the most reputable sources that say Jesus existed is a historian named Josephus.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spread Of Christianity

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These miracles are viewed as sceptical due to the inability to use scientific evidence to prove that they were possible. In Jesus’ time and still in the 21st century, it is highly improbable that these miracles could occur and as a result he was labelled as a sorcerer. This combined with the radically increasing technology of the 21st century, allows non-believers to struggle to understand that miracles like Jesus’ could have occurred. Currently, our society bases the truth and facts on their ability to be proved historically and scientifically. However in the case of Jesus miracles, this is not possible and reinforces the possibility that Jesus was simply just a man and not the Messiah he claimed to be.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Case For Christ Analysis

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I doubt they would ever finish the book to start with to be perfectly honest. I think they would be confused or pushed farther away from Christianity and any relationship to God. For starters, many non-believers tend to not be atheists. I mean Atheists are so hard to win to Christ because they already have a belief that there is the higher power and are stubborn in that, just like any strong Christian would very unlikely be driven to the thought of no God and this world is just it for humanity. In some ways, Atheism makes more sense they Christianity.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They do not understand the significance of their actions, which undermines their piety. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence,” Jesus explains how some people were pure on the surface, but had an impure soul (Matthew 23.25). “Jesus told the crowds all these things in parables; without parable he told them nothing,” this allowed Jesus to show them that faith is about more than just following what is listed in scripture ( Matthew 13.34). The message of God is hidden and “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field, which a man found and covered up; then in his joy he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field,” which emphasize the need of human interpretation and analysis (Matthew 13.44).…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Richard Dawkins and John Lennox recently had a lively debate over what is arguably the most important questions of recent times. The following points formed the main arguments of each person's stand point. 1. RICHARD DAWKINS' MAIN ARGUMENTS [1] Dawkins says that he cannot comprehend that God, who can do anything, couldn't find a better way to forgive sin than to have Himself tortured and killed. He stated that believing in the resurrection of Christ was "petty and small-minded", because it goes against every law of science.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics