The Pros And Cons Of Outlawing The Insanity Plea

Decent Essays
In 1999, Andrew Goldstein pushed a young lady named Kendra Webdale in front of a moving train, killing her. He has a history of schizophrenia, claimed to hear voices. Knowing that he has this mental disorder the insanity plea will give him freedom and he may put others life in danger. This disorder made him physically push this lady in front of the moving train. Without the insanity plea he would have been punished and maybe learned how to deal with this disorder. So no matter what the reason was for killing her he still did it with his hands no one else pushed her.

Outlawing the insanity should be highly considered not to make the criminals feel bad but teach them a lesson or at least help them control this disorder if they are medically

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On May 20, 1998, Kipland Kinkel went on a shooting rampage at Thurstone High School. After the shooting spree Kipland was arrested and convicted of four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, with a total sentence time of 111 years and eight months. Four years into the 111-year sentence, the attorneys of Kipland Kinkel appealed the initial sentencing. In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” Judge Haselton offers information on the original trial, the grounds of the appeal and the state’s decision to uphold the sentence. Judge Haselton utilizes the rhetorical tools of ethos, pathos and logos to support the court’s decision to deny the appeal.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ultimately, only a jury can decide the issue of insanity, which in itself may be the most controversial aspect about the insanity defense. In other words, people who have no training in the field, rarely come into contact with the mentally ill and have a minimal understanding of the issues involved, make legal, long-lasting judgments that are frequently based on shifting criteria. If he were to be denied the opportunity to use the defense, there would need to be a secondary set of defenses which allow the charges against him to be greatly mitigated. The team would have to consider accepting a plea to lessen the time he would ultimately be incarcerated. It would be unfavorable but because of the fact that there was actus reus but lacked mens rea, it would be hard to get him not have him serve any time at…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, he was insane at the time of the offense. Mr. Wertz trauma and stressor-related disorder (PTSD) has totally impaired his state of mind, thought process and actions. It has caused him to react to a perceived, but non-existent threat. The notion of this threat only existed in his diseased mind, and in his recurring…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1986, the United States Supreme Court determined that the Eighth Amendment barred the execution of the insane; it prohibits cruel and unusual punishment (Liptak, 2003). It was argued that it a person should be spared of execution if they are delusional enough to not understand their own crime and why they are being sentenced to death. However, in 1990 the Supreme Court decided in favor forcing medication if it believed that a prisoner is at risk of harming themself or others. Due to this ruling Singleton was forced to take antipsychotics because it was determined to be at risk for harming himself because of his schizophrenia and illusions. I think that it is critical to protect prisoners from harm, regardless of what they have done, at the end of the day they are still a human being.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While many criminal acts are symptomatic of psychopathology, some may not be. There are "normal" people who commit crimes, but research has shown that most crimes are commited by a majority with some disorder and abnormal. When it comes to dealing with criminals, I think it's important to treat the case on an individual basis. In some cases, some criminals deserve punishment to deter them from repeating the offense such as murder or rape, others would do better with treatment such as chronic marijuana users. Also, I believe labeling of particular offenders "criminal" is not a good idea for the interest of society and for the interest of the offender such as a young man who is sent to prison for smoking marijuana.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense has been around for centuries and has always been the center of debate. According to Zachary D. Torry and Stephen B. Billick (2007), a crime must have two key attributes evil intent (mens rea)…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    was found not guilty by reasoning of insanity. Still seen as mentally unstable, he was immediately sent to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington D.C. The nation was outraged by the verdict. Some states were so belligerent that they banned the insanity defense all together. The said-to-be schizophrenic’s parents would open a fund to support the mentally ill and awareness for the mentally ill.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays