Andrew Jackson Controversial Essay

Superior Essays
Andrew Jackson’s presidency could easily be considered one of the most controversial yet most influential presidencies of all time. Jackson was the seventh President of the United states and served two terms during the years of 1829 to 1837. Jackson would definitely be considered a president for the people. He tried to do everything in his power to help the citizens of America, but this passion caused Jackson some trouble . The political views of Andrew Jackson were controversial in that Jackson’s ideas about Democracy, the National Bank, and Indian Removal created an uprising of animosity and dispute between the citizens and government of America.
Jackson believed that America should have a democracy, meaning that the government should be
…show more content…
The National Bank is a commercial bank that is chartered under the federal government and is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Andrew could not modify the bank charter because of the act that was in play. He believed that it was necessary to make the bank compatible with justice, with sound policy, or with the constitution of the country. Jackson stated in his bank veto message to congress, “The present Bank of the Unites States...enjoys an exclusive privilege of banking,...almost a monopoly of the foreign and domestic exchange.” Although the National Bank had an exclusive privilege of banking, other stocks are held mostly by the foreigners and the little bit that is left is held by a few hundred other wealthier citizens of America. There are twenty-five directors of the National Bank and of those twenty-five, five are chosen by the government and the other twenty are filled by the citizen stockholders. Jackson believed that the group in charge of the bank are not the best people to run the bank. He states, “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country...might flow from such concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”³ Andrew believes that for selfish reasons, the “rich and powerful” often bend the acts of government to suit their needs. During Jackson’s presidency, a scandal broke out. …show more content…
Andrew Jackson recognized a problem with how the Indian tribes had been treated within each state. The people in the states were persuading and forcing the Indians to move from “river to river and from mountain to mountain”, and because of this some tribes had become extinct. When Jackson noticed the problem, he addressed the nation, “Humanity and national honor demand that every effort should be made to avert so great a calamity.” Jackson encouraged people to set apart a region of land west of the Mississippi River that is outside the limits of any state or territory that was formed at that point in time, and that, that land would be guaranteed to the Indian tribes as long as they remain holding the land and each tribe having control of the land given to them. This would be optional for the Indians because Jackson did not want to make the tribes abandon their homeland and look for home someplace else. The only exception that the Jackson said the Indians had to follow, was if they chose to stay where they are and not move, they must abide by the laws that are set in place by the states. The Indians did not want to leave, for they did not want to leave the land of their fathers and they said that they had done nothing to invade man’s rights, they have not robbed a man of his territory, they did not take any man’s

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Andrew Jackson played an important role in the age of economic nationalism and growing political sectionalism. Economic nationalism is a circumstance in which a country attempts to preserve its personal economy by minimizing the amount of imports and investments from other countries. Political sectionalism is the support of a particular part of the United States of specific political interests. Economic nationalism and political sectionalism can be seen in Andrew Jackson’s actions in the South Carolina nullification crisis, the Bank War, and the Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson argued that the legitimization for state invalidation of government laws was misinformed, unlawful, and treasonous to the nation.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whereas, Jackson wrote, “On Indian Removal” to persuade Congress that the American Indians should relocate: “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curtis explains that initially Jackson had no quarrel with the Native Americans because they never had harmed anyone in his family, but tensions between them and other westerners influenced his views (22). As Jackson grew older his words on Native Americans grew harsher and showed how he hated them for their disorder. Later when Jackson was a military man, he took to slaughtering so many Native Americans. He did this to the Creeks who had sided with the British and attacked Fort Mims in 1813 (Curtis 49). Yet during his presidency, when tensions with the United States and the Native Americans were high, Jackson said that “Indians are subjects of the United Stated” (Curtis 71).…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of his greatest accomplishments as president was when he became involved in a battle with the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson took a stand towards this monopoly and vetoed its re-charter bill, charging the bank with unfair economic privilege. Even though Jackson was popular with the common man, his presidency did have some controversies. One policy that is up for debate is how Jackson dealt with the Native Americans. In 1830, many southerners wanted Native Americans to move out of their land and in response; Jackson urged congress to pass the Indian Removal Act (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254).…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson had an influence on nineteenth-century American Politics and that influence still reigns today. Jackson’s political views were in some ways considered controversial. He was for democracy and the people having the power, he felt strongly that the national bank should be eradicated, and he was for the Indian Removal and keeping the U.S. citizens safe. These would have been considered controversial because some of the political decisions he would make had could have more than one interpretation or more than one way to view them. This made them debatable to many people of the United States.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson Removal Thesis

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Jackson defended his stand by asserting that removal was the only course of action that could save the Native Americans from extinction. Jackson's attitude toward Native Americans was patronizing, describing them as children in need of guidance and believed the removal policy was beneficial to them. To congressional leaders, he assured them that his policies would enable the federal government to place the Indians in a region where they would be free of white encroachment and jurisdictional disputes between the states and the federal government. He asked congressional approval of his removal policy. Some of the people that were sitting in the government didn’t like the idea of Jackson and didn’t want to move the tribes from their lands, by…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe that Andrew Jackson was a good beneficial president, and many people believe that he was an evil one. I am here to tell you that he was a man of corruption, not because of his persona, but because of his brutal acts towards the Native American people. Andrew Jackson, during his presidency slaughtered and massacred a multitude of Native American people, and took their land. Of course not doing this single handedly, he ordered American troops under his command to follow him in this genocide. And it was not only the males, Jackson and troops alike killed the woman and children as well!…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cherokee Indian from the “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” describes the western land as badly supplied with food and water, unfamiliar cultures, and “wish to die” on this soil (Doc. K). Jackson forced the Indians to surrender their land and failed to provide any support in terms of food and other necessities for their westward migration. Because of the Indian’s utmost disenchantment, it is possible that they took their case to the Supreme Court. However, Jackson could have ignored that decision since he already had a majority vote in Congress to be condemned and impeached. Conjointly, Native Americans were gathered into similar places in the west.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson claimed that expansion was the future of America. He was right, after all, but he went about taking the land of the Native America people in the wrong way. The Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation did not have to submit to the Georgia State Law, but Jackson did not respect the treaties made to them. Instead he promised them that they could keep a certain amount of land, but that promise was never kept. Through Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy,…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Jackson was President of the United States from 1824-1836. He was a controversial president. In many ways, Andrew Jackson abused his power and acted like a “king”, often destroying people and institutions by his actions. In nearly taking the nation to war to enforce the tariff, in sending thousands of people to their death in the “Trail of Tears”, and in taking down the U.S economy by destroying the National Bank, Andrew Jackson proved to be a tyrannical president.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jackson thought passionately that if they were to move the Indians out west for a fair trade of money and supplies it would make life better for both Indians and Americans. It wasn’t like he was being a king and just doing what he wanted because he had public support (Holt 10.3). Jackson did not do what he was supposed to do which was to enforce the laws of the land…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indians may leave the State or not, as they choose.” (6). Jackson essentially allowed State governments to act as they please with the remaining Indians in the acquired land. Rather than offering them protection, Jackson left the fate of the Indians to the States, which in turn led to forced emigration. Jackson found that relations between Indians and individual states should not be interfered further by the General Government, resulting in taken land and State pressure for the Indians.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States and served our country from March 4, 1829 to March 3, 1837 (Andrew, Jackson 1). Jackson remains one of the most controversial of all American historical figures, and is known for committing crimes against the Native Americans and fighting for his people (Richardson, Chris). Not only was he a war hero, but a two-term president commonly known by the nickname, “Old Hickory.” This was because he was a strict officer and his troops claimed him to be “tough as old hickory” wood on the battlefield (Brookhiser, Richard). In fact, the most famous open house held at the White House was when President Andrew Jackson moved in on March 4, 1929 the event had about 20,000 visitors.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first document that we were to read was Andrew Jackson’s Second Annual Message. The Annual Message would be the equivalent to the State of the Union Address. This was a speech that Jackson delivered to Congress about the Government policies and changes that he wishes to make within his next year of presidency. Jackson’s biggest concern was about the removal of the Native Americans. Some of his main points were that removal of the Indians will strengthen and prevent invasions within the southwestern states, it would allow states such as Mississippi and Alabama to expand their population, wealth, and power, and it would be beneficial for the Natives because it would allow them to “pursue happiness in their own ways”.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays