The Mystery Of The Speckled Band Analysis

Improved Essays
Dr. Roylott was the step-father of Helen Stoner and Julia Stoner from the novella “The Mystery of the Speckled Band”. He had attempted murder upon his own children by using a trained snake to poison them. One night, he used the snake to try and kill Helen for he would receive her wealth given to her by her mother after she died. Ironically, the snake had bit Dr.Roylott while he sat waiting for the snake which subsequently made him perish; however, someone or something must have instigated the snake to afflict its fury upon Dr.Roylott. This had been Sherlock Holmes for he had jabbed the snake using his cane to turn it around to protect him and Dr.Watson from harm as well as Helen Stoner. Sherlock Holmes could not have known that he was position in the chair at the time or where the snake would head off to. These factors come into place that Sherlock Holmes had indeed not committed murder or attempt of such horrific acts. As Sherlock Holmes was waiting for the arrival of the snake that killed Julia, he had no intentions in harming anyone at the crime for he was only there to solve the puzzling murder of Julia Stoner as well as bringing justice to the murderer. To demonstrate, Sherlock Holmes had not been in contact with Dr.Roylott or seen where he would be in his room. Dr.Roylott had been sitting under the ventilator …show more content…
Dr.Roylott was the real murderer of himself for his greed and hunger for money took more control of him then his own intelligence. Sherlock Holmes could not have been the murderer for he had no idea of Dr.Roylott’s positioning. No sane person would wait for the arrival of a deadly snake under the access point being the ventilator. Sherlock Holmes may have blamed himself; however, Dr.Roylott should be responsible for his own demise for without his foolishness or his greed, the death would have never occurred in the first

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    No one out of all the people got hurt and the plumber was framed but after a couple of days he got out and back to his family then got back to work. I think that Sherlock Holmes did do the correct thing in the end. Cause if he threw them in jail for stealing something that they didn’t even do then when they got out people would see them at…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Herman Webster Mudgett, also known as H.H. Holmes, built a hotel in Chicago full of evil ways to kill his victims. Holmes had a hard childhood which could have affected his future. He became obsessed with death at a young age because he was abused by his parents and he was horribly bullied at school. Holmes admitted to killing 27-200 people but murder was not the only crime he enjoyed to commit. He often committed insurance fraud and he also stole cadavers from medical schools to experiment on.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this doctor, his personal thoughts came up following a lethal morphine injection. The uncomfort he felt after “helping” this man showed in the panicking tendencies, seeing the IV pole with watching eyes and saying he was innocent for not killing the man. Although the doctor was uncomfortable, he did exactly as the patient and family asked. So did this doctor murder his patient? In the doctor’s eyes he did, but it was for a medical reason, not a personal one.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Roylott Trial

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sherlock had no way of anticipating the position of Dr. Roylott. Lastly, Sherlock Holmes responded in self-defense as the snake was lethal. Ultimately, Holmes’s intention in the affair was to protect Helen from the same fate that her sister, Julia, met. In the…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theory Of Rational Choice

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (Esposito, Date, Thomas & Ferran) In relation to the rational thinking process haven took place, Holmes' apartment, just five miles from the theater, was rigged with explosive booby-traps and if officers had rush in, would have increased the death toll for that unforgettable…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are two stories in which one can analyze and put into comparison, that being the story of the “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” and “The Speckle Band”. In the story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde the perspective is told form the protagonist Mr. Utterson, which is lawyer and a friend to Dr. Jekyll. While in “The Speckle Band” the story is foretold from Watson’s point of view as he analyzes the investigation that Holmes conducts in the tale. Holmes and Mr. Utterson these two individuals, who seem completely different, are more alike in a similar ways than one might think. By reviewing the text of both tales, there is a set of both similarities and differences able to be made between such as character, setting, personal motivation,…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case present to Sherlock Holmes in "The Crooked Man" seems to be a outrageous and deceiving, when Nancy Barclay kills her husband in a locked room which forms a heavy argument. The police, seem disinterested in the missing key or the animal tracks inside the room, facts which Holmes see as an important clue. The story develops from a supposedly impossible crime into a cycle of why events have happened as they did. Part of the story deals, eventually, with some other books that Conan Doyle wrote or narrated. The fact that there is no crime in "The Crooked Man" doesn't pull away from the story, for the case shows how Holmes sees the clues differently than the police force sees them.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” by sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Dr. Roylott, the antagonist, was inadvertently killed by Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock, however, was not responsible due to an abundant amount of unpredictable variables that involved the case of Helen Stoner. For example, Sherlock was to do everything in his power to protect his client, Helen Stoner, from danger. In addition, he could not predict that Dr. Roylott could be bitten by the snake. Moreover, the detective acted in self-defense when he struck the swap adder which led to the extinction of Dr. Roylott.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Speckled Band

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Roylott’s bedroom to see what had caused the terrible scream. Wrapped around his head was a speckled band; suddenly it became clear that it was the same “speckled band” that ended Julia’s life. Sure enough, the band unwound himself from Dr. Roylott’s head to reveal its true identity- a swamp adder, the deadliest snake in India. Sherlock’s tenacity and compatibility with Dr. Watson led to the resolution of the story. Dr. Grimesby Roylott was dead and would no longer be causing any harm to Helen Stoner, who was taken to Harrow to live with her aunt.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In A Study in Scarlet, by Sir Author Conan Doyle, he uses a witty and brilliant detective named Sherlock Holmes to show the audience how investigators solved crime back then during that time period and the different technology they used to solve them and how it is different today’s technology. In the show series Sherlock, the episode “A Study in Pink”, gives a little bit of a modern take on A Study in Scarlet and shows how technology advancements can make the better. Having these modern twists strengthens the story, A Study in Scarlet. In A Study in Scarlet, Sherlock Holmes, a “consulting” detective, is called on by the police to help the other detectives and try to figure out a very strenuous inconclusive murder trial.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ravenging Daisy

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While it may have solved the difficulties at the time, it causes more complications down the road because now there is a risk of going to jail. Killing someone will not solve all their problems, and Poirot is instigating a fabricated idea that if Ratchett was dead then all their problems would magically disappear. As a detective, it is imperative to not develop emotional attachments to a case. The attachment can cloud a person’s judgment. Since he is a detective, his job is to find a way to serve justice.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Based on the autopsy reports, The Ripper had no medical training or anatomy knowledge whatsoever by the way the victims were mutilated. 2. The two investigators also concluded that The Ripper was “a man of solitary habits”; he stalked these women and while he mutilated them, he felt an “uncontrollable sexual desire” (Ibid). C.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherlock Holmes has been extremely popular since Sir Author Conan Doyle created him. Holmes is a fictional character in the late 19th century who was a remarkable detective. He is known for solving mysterious cases that no other person could solve, not even the police. Sherlock is an excellent detective for his use of observations, deductions, and imagination. Holmes uses these skills in the stories: “A Study in Scarlet”, “The Speckled Band”, and “Silver Blaze”.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, “Invitation to a Murder” occurred inside a room with limited entrances, supporting the statement it was a locked room mystery. Its counterpart, “The Dying Detective” was not the same, due to its ability for characters to enter and leave the room freely. Moreover, Pachter’s story included a murder that was committed out of love, for Mrs. Abbott wished to murder her husband solely to relieve him from the misery that he had been engulfed with for an entire year. Doyle’s mystery, on the other hand, involved a murder, as well as an attempted murder, that was committed out of Culverton Smith’s hate for his cousin, Victor Savage, and Sherlock Holmes. Finally, “Invitation to a Murder” differed from “The Dying Detective” since Mrs. Abbott physically used no weapon to kill Mr. Abbott, whereas Smith had utilized a poisoned spring within a box in his schemes.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, I think Sherlock Holmes positively did the wrong thing. This decision can really affect people. That is why in my opinion, Sherlock Holmes did the wrong thing. Some serious consequences can happen. These are my reasons why I think Sherlock Holmes did the wrong thing First of all, people still were committing crimes and it is all Sherlock Holmes fault for letting the criminals free.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays