Schellenberg Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
Schellenberg’s argument which simply put, states that a loving parent would not be hidden to their child if they could help it, human parents and God are relevantly similar when it comes to loving, therefore God would not be hidden if it can help it, and in conclusion a loving God could never be hidden. Four objections were brought up against this argument though we will be focusing on the third and more substantial objection. The two major points the third objection has is firstly that it is presumptuous to expect a response and secondly that it is human failings and not of Gods though I will explain further on this later. The major question though is whether this objection defeats Schellenberg’s argument and I will have to say no as I will …show more content…
Schellenberg responds simply that this doesn’t count in the presence of an unlimited being. I would agree that if God was all powerful then he would be able to allow us to notice him and since God contains the characteristics of a loving parent then he would show himself to us. And the last statement the objection made is that there is some great good for the seeker that depends on the continuation of their search; the relevant good may be unknown to the seekers. Schellenberg responds as such that for serious spiritual development it must begin with God, a relationship with God would be the greatest of good to us, so denying us the ability to access this relationship seems to work against the great good. And as stated earlier if God was all-powerful and all-knowing then he knows the best way to connect with us and would have no limitations on doing so. The third objection offers different perspective on how we see Schellenberg’s argument it is still not enough to defeat his argument. The objection relies on the fact that we don’t understand the purpose on why God is hidden to us and so must assume that there is a goal he has for us. Though this kind of thought falls apart when we start to understand that a 3Os God has the power to bypass any limitations within our universe. So given that God would have all loving characteristics and many more then the apparent hiddenness of God would simply not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Strawson's Initial Basic Argument Analysis
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Strawson's Initial Basic Argument Analysis

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Otterbein University Argument Analysis
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otterbein University Argument Analysis

    “We honor our past because it shapes our future,” this is one of the many quotes that Otterbein University holds dearly. Otterbein University holds this value greatly. Otterbein gives equality to all students, faculty, and others since 1847. Before any women’s rights and the abolishment of slavery, Otterbein University allowed people of color and women to receive a fair and equal education. Otterbein University is a mid-sized college located in Westerville, Ohio.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Bibl 104 Week 1 Assignment
    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibl 104 Week 1 Assignment

    This writing assignment report will reflect, in many cases, chapter by chapter reflection of the material read from two books. In each section review I will be responding with a general statement about the chapter and any reflections, thoughts or opinions gleamed from my studies. Father, Son, & Holy Spirt Chapter 1 of the Father, Son, & Holy Spirt pulls the reader into a discussion about why understanding the Trinity is important in the life of Christian believer. Ware expounds on the point that Gods wisdom chose reveal himself as Triune. Causing mankind to lean towards gaining wisdom about Him by means of faith alone.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Brownstein's Argument Analysis
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brownstein's Argument Analysis

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Schlesinger's Argument Analysis
    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Schlesinger's Argument Analysis

    When I begun to read, I recognize that thesis quickly, it was clear as day. In my opinion the thesis was " she may not be the voice of a comedic generation. but Schlesinger is a good comedian and her shows are a great deal of fun. The thesis was an effectiveness evaluation, the thesis measure up to the overall claim. For the evaluation of this subject, the criteria was the standards of the jokes, which was said to be one of the major things that was looked for.…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Schelling's Argument Analysis
    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schelling's Argument Analysis

    Thus, Christianity is in Schelling’s perspective the only recipient of the divine revelation that once again discloses God’s spiritual oneness to humanity. However, although he decides to prioritize a particular tradition, the result of Schelling’s exploration of monotheism is God as the unfathomable unity of the three potencies. Moreover, we have to keep in mind God’s absolute freedom as regard having or not a relationship to being, or to any form of presentation of himself. Thus, it is fair to say that in Schelling’s view God is free enough to deny himself as Trinity. Hence, on one hand the Trinity is the best presentation possible of God’s essence as it reflects the three principles in their relationship with one another and with God.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    A Scientific Argument For The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Scientific Argument For The Existence Of God Analysis

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Criticisms Of Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criticisms Of Anselm's Ontological Argument

    “God is that which no greater can be conceived” is a statement that rules out any credible support other than from Anselm own Christian devotion. Anselm makes this evident when he states “I may understand that you exist as we believe you to exist, and that you are what we believe you to be” (Anselm, 7) this means that Anselm alone doesn’t know the clear nature of God but he is able to make simple inferences for this proof. So how can we come to know that God is none greater than can be conceived if we are designating our own definition of a maximally perfect being. Anselm portrays that God can be known solely from reasoning in thoughts rather than from impression of god himself in our knowledge.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Cleanthes Argument Analysis
    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cleanthes Argument Analysis

    Cleanthes' argument from design for God's existence is not convincing. He compares two different ideas and thus, wrongly generalizes. He also commits a fallacy, and doesn’t meet the criteria necessary for the type of argument he offers. Although, a few potential strong points are present in his beliefs, like the improbability of chance, and the incomprehensible evidence of God, they are still not strong enough for His justification. Cleanthes through an a posteriori, inductive argument claims that since the presence of small machines (i.e. houses) implies human design, the presence of an even bigger machine (i.e. the universe) implies a human-like intelligence behind it as well as "the adapting of means to ends in natural and human machines…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stunz's Argument Analysis
    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stunz's Argument Analysis

    Another site of legal violence is within mass incarceration. William Stunz addresses the violence of the system as focusing on the process over the outcome. He focuses on how the law was put into place to create the desired outcomes, rather than looking at the results to create the law. This focus on the process means there is no inquiry to whether material outcomes of the process are actually just and as such it appears that the system does not want to fix the problem, but rather just emphasize an existing problem. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes (Gopnik 2012).…

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John L. Mackie's Argument Against The Problem Of Evil
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John L. Mackie's Argument Against The Problem Of Evil

    An Australian philosopher named John L. Mackie is widely known for his argument against the problem of evil. Mackie’s argument was very similar to the problem of evil. The problem of evil in summary states that a God cannot exist with the existence of evil, but Mackie’s argument was not that God did not exist entirely, but rather that God did not exist as an all-powerful or perfect God. He argued that having an all knowing God, and the present existence of evil were both logically inconsistent. Mackie thought that if you could say one of those statements was false, then you could still believe in God’s existence.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Holbach's Argument Analysis
    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Holbach's Argument Analysis

    The True Puppeteer What is free will? Is it a false belief or an idea of human actions? Paul Halbach believes that human beings do not have ‘free will’, because he is a determinist. A determinist believes that all human choices, events, actions, and reactions are all already determined.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings