Holbach's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
The True Puppeteer What is free will? Is it a false belief or an idea of human actions? Paul Halbach believes that human beings do not have ‘free will’, because he is a determinist. A determinist believes that all human choices, events, actions, and reactions are all already determined. Holbach argues that ,us, human beings as physical objects, that only obey the un-mutable laws of nature, and that the environment we live in, influences our cognitive thinking that fuels our actions, the way we perceive things, that in turn drives our motives, beliefs, desires, and our will to act. He would also argue that having choices does not prove freedom, and the absence of restraint is not absence of necessity, and that it we build up an illusion of …show more content…
In his article, he made an example where person B threw himself out of a window, to prove a point to person A (determinist), that we have freedom of choice. But ironically, person B’s action proved person A’s, and Holbach’s argument to be correct: That our desires, beliefs, controls our sense of will to act. Person B was controlled by his motivation, his desire, his belief, to prove that we do have freedom. Holbach 's states in relation to our desires controlling our will, “whether this obstacle or motive be with his own machine or exterior of his person: he is not master of the thought presented to his mind, which determines his will; this thought is excited by some cause independent of himself” (441). Meaning that we do not control our will, it is our motives, beliefs that works the human body machine and forces it to move, not the other way around. Holbach believes that humans are not a free agent. Because we do not create our own desires, or motivations, (etc.), we are only influenced by the environment such as external objects that stimulates our perception. Which relates back to person B responds to its external object, person A’s views, which made him jump out of a window because he wanted to prove that we do have free

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In contrast, Sam Harris objected about the real concept of freewill. Harris is a neuroscientist and he believes that there is no such thing as freedom. According to him our brain acts upon our sub-conscious activities and human are just a puppet to their brain. As much as it sounds disturbing, it is a fact to some degree. In the book “free will” he explained that our…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holbach states that it is not free will that causes you to perform an action, but it is his desire or motive which decides to perform an action. Meaning, the reason you decided to perform an action was to convince your opponent. The desire to convince your opponent was what made you perform your action instead of free will where your desires were created from temperament which is out of your control. All motives and ideas originate from your temperament which was created by laws nature created that you must obey without your consent, therefore you cannot do not have any free will on your motives, ideas, and desires. People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In my argument, I am going to support Strawson’s claims and argue against Libertarians that it is not possible to be truly morally responsible for one’s actions even with this idea of indeterminacy. Libertarians specifically believe that our free will allows us to have true moral responsibility. In order to fully understand Strawson’s views and the views of those that counter him, we must revisit what his basic argument is. As human beings, we make specific choices and carry out actions the way we do because of our character or personality or motivational structures (CPM). In order for one to be considered as truly morally responsible (TMR) for one’s choices and actions, one must be truly morally responsible and have full control over their CPM.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Hard Determinism

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To assess the extent to which free will is compatible with determinism, one must first consider other approaches to the concept of free will and whether or not it is something humans possess. A hard determinist, such as d’Holbach, would claim that individuals are not free to initiate actions or make moral decisions, thereby making the concept of moral responsibility redundant. Any moral decisions humans make occur solely due to uncontrollable prior causes. Moreover, hard determinism holds that humans do not have free will and that all seemingly ‘moral’ actions are the consequences of past events that are out of their control. The incompatibility between…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness. Therefore, it is unacceptable for a Dualist perspective to accept his stance on free will. Since d’Holbach views that there is no such thing as free will, a major concern of his argument is brought up being that if a persons’ actions are pre-determined and in order to fit with his proposition, it would not be morally correct to punish that individual for their actions. It would still be practical to isolate a harmful individual from society from d’Holbach’s view, except it would only be done for logical reasons and not for disciplinary…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this Sartre claimed that we are “Condemned to be free.” Sartre's views may be viewed as liberating and logical, but our knowledge of the world firmly supports that we may not be as free as he artistically expressed. Sartre believed that all men are free. He held that we do not make our choices because of a deity’s commands. Sartre believes in no god. Additionally, Sartre maintained that we do not make our decisions because of our nature or our nurture (two of the main deterministic arguments).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people may go ahead and steal to stay alive while others may choose to act differently and do the complete opposite. Your actions solely depend on you and what type of person you are. Stace also claims that it is delusion to think that determinism is incompatible with free will meanwhile it is merely impossible for them to be compatible as determinism claims that freedom is just an illusion while free will is the complete opposite and is the notion that people are free to act and behave as they please. How can free will and determinism be compatible when people have no control of the causes that occur around them which according to Stace is the reason that they act in a certain manner? If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he believed that they could be a difficulty in using the idea of a state of nature because those who employ it project characteristics found only in society upon men in their original condition. As a result of this, the state of nature was simply a hypothesis to him. He went ahead to dismiss Hobbes idea that men were self-seeking and competitive by nature and in the absence of goodness in the state of nature men are naturally evil. Rousseau notes that one of the main problems humans face is that although they want to be free, they also want the advantages of living in society because it is only as a citizen that man can fulfil…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we, as a society agree in punishment for breaking laws, then we, as a society must believe in free will. Humans must have free will or we are punishing people for actions for which they had no control. There cannot be moral responsibility if everything is determined, as the responsibility would not fall on the human, but rather the force that made the predetermination. Philosopher John Locke discusses this in his book An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He states that the ability to suspend the fulfillment of one’s desires shows that we are have free will.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics