Schlesinger's Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
When I begun to read, I recognize that thesis quickly, it was clear as day. In my opinion the thesis was " she may not be the voice of a comedic generation. but Schlesinger is a good comedian and her shows are a great deal of fun. The thesis was an effectiveness evaluation, the thesis measure up to the overall claim. For the evaluation of this subject, the criteria was the standards of the jokes, which was said to be one of the major things that was looked for. How energetic the person was and how dirty the jokes were could be identified as some of the other criteria that the writer used to evaluate. The authors experience on watching the show was his evidence when providing support to his evaluation. Comedy nerds, was quoted as the target

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this article the author Eric Schecher uses evidence, reasoning and stylistic choices to strengthen his claim and persuade his audience. Schecher uses stylistic choices such as carefully using strong and sturdy words to exude a strong point to the audience. He uses words such as authoritarianism, sufficient, refrain and indictment to create a strong professional argument. In the article Schecher questions the reasoning of killing millions of innocent people. He does this to further display his standpoint on the matter and to further persuade his audience.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to avoid the awkward “please pass the potato salad” at Thanksgiving between you and your conservative cousin Carl, most people will avoid discussing politics altogether. For example, Sean Spicer, the White House Press Secretary, held interviews with pool reporters—in other words, conservative news outlets that aligned with his political leanings. This coincides with the claims made by Joseph E. Uscinski in his article Fake News Freakout, where he said, “People tended to avoid news they disagreed with—and when they nonetheless did encounter a message that they rejected, they found ways to discount it or to interpret it in a manner that made it congruent with their pre-existing opinions” (Uscinski, Fake News Freakout). With the First…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Open Your Eyes In the first chapter, Heinrichs explains that the most important part of an argument is to be able to use rhetoric so the argument goes your way. Heinrichs states that a person needs to persuade the audience in their argument so the argument can go their way. He uses examples from an everyday life to show how humans are easily persuaded like and alarm, a smoke detector, and even a cat. Other tools Heinrichs uses to help get an argument to go your way would be to use seduction, to change the audience’s mood, or chiasmus, which get people to take action and listen to what you have to say.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Klusendorf argues through a biblical standpoint that abortion is immoral from multiple standpoints. He starts with discussing whether if the Bible being silent allows it by default, clears up his views on what he considers human beings, and ends with an examination on the pro-choice interpretation of a Bible passage. His first point is that we should know that abortion is wrong because we are treating other humans unjustly by doing so. Racists are then given as an example, who had used Scripture’s silence as their proof. Another one of his main points is that it was unnecessary to address the matter at the time.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is a great example for proving that there is a flaw in the way schools develop he definition of a belief vs. fact; McBrayer says that schools are not using the right terms when defining these two, thus creating chaos when a child/teenager has to decide whether something is true or false, or right or wrong. He points out that the problem is that schools basically play something like the "Devil's advocate" when having a child choose whether something is a fact or a belief, when really every case is different and some facts can or cannot be proven. McBrayer also validates his argument by providing proof that he found the problem in his son's school "When I went to visit my son’s second grade open house, I found a troubling pair of signs hanging…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people tend to not care about politics or anything of that nature. However E.J. Graff presents a very valid point. She states “No biggie, some people think: Just write a will and some health care proxies, appoint a guardian, and you're all set (4). However it is not that easy as may think. E.J. Graff thoroughly evaluated her claim and made a lot of valid points on the continuous revolving issue of the homosexuals and adoption rights.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are sources in the world that research the decrease or increase of their nation’s economic growth. There are different aspects and opinions to the level of economic inequality and immobility. There are sources that contradict each other’s proof on this issue due to the evidence that each source contained from each other. The views of this argument to the sources is that to see which argument is superior to the other and I found that Surowicki argument is superior to Obama’s speech because it finds all the loop holes in Obama’s speech. The things that I see that in Surowiecki argument is that she stating that the economic mobility has not changed at all due to valid research.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a word, yes. Walzer’s deconstruction of the realist argument leaves the reader completely convinced that he is right, while the self-serving and reprehensible realists are not only wrong but morally depraved. Why? Because he has identified and brought out into the harsh glare of the open the moral ambiguity, rhetorical ploy, and self-serving innuendo of the realists while insisting upon moral uprightness for his own interpretation of the truth. After exposing the realists for the immoral and underhanded people that they are, Walzer reveals the realists for the darkened souls they hold.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stunz's Argument Analysis

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another site of legal violence is within mass incarceration. William Stunz addresses the violence of the system as focusing on the process over the outcome. He focuses on how the law was put into place to create the desired outcomes, rather than looking at the results to create the law. This focus on the process means there is no inquiry to whether material outcomes of the process are actually just and as such it appears that the system does not want to fix the problem, but rather just emphasize an existing problem. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes (Gopnik 2012).…

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curzer's Argument Analysis

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    from that era actually worked. There are many theorists that contradict the traditional family from the 1950s and give more support to Curzer’s claim. One of the philosophers that creates a conflict to the traditional family and helps Curzer’s argument is John Stuart Mill. Mill’s moral theory states that morality is about the consequences of our actions and not about character like Aristotle says, or arguments or intentions.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A good thesis is a statement that catches the reader’s attention but an even better thesis is one that makes the reader laugh. Dave Berry shows character in his essay “Turkeys in the Kitchen” by adding humor to get his point across. His thesis statement is amusing but yet interesting, he opens his essay by saying “Men are still basically scum when it comes to helping out in the kitchen.” This statement is unusual, because you would think that since Berry is a man he wouldn’t be talking down on his own gender. The essay is about gender roles during Thanksgiving and Berry uses a humorous tone throughout the essay to make his arguments relevant.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kuhn's Argument Analysis

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    throughout time the same scientific data has been viewed differently by people in various global locations. These differences could very possibly be caused by each person having their own unique observation. Kuhn believes our world view to be all we have, it is how we view the world observe and experience the world but there is no way to discover how close our world view is to reality. Here, Kuhn suggest that each individual being experiences the world differently. His reasoning is as follows: because our brain is responsible for our experience, and our experiences happen only in our brain, it is logical to assume that we cannot possibly share experiences because we cannot share brains.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In today’s world, humor is portrayed through many different outlets of society. Whether it be on the radio, in person during stand up, or on television, comedy is an easy way to lighten the mood and make easy conversation out of controversial topics. In Humor as a Technique of Social Influence the author states, “Humor may indeed be used to influence others, and suggest that humor may be a powerful agent of change in everyday life” (O’Quin and Aronoff, 355). Comedy in television is a crucial role in the everyday community when it comes to not only discussing debatable topics, but diffusing them as well. Television uses humor through many different ways including jokes, skits, and embarrassing occasions.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the word argument is mentioned what comes to mind, a fight or altercation? Philosophy has a different definition of an argument. It has nothing to do with being violent or verbally abusive to the contender. An argument is a process of reasoning from one claim to another. An argument supports your ideas with justification from other ideas, principles, and observations to establish your conclusions and overcome objections.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays