King John And Magna Carta By Dan Jones

Superior Essays
In 1215, The Magna Carta was brought up in a field in England known as Runnymede. The Magna Carta was a charter that was targeted against the deranged king of England at the time, King John. The Archbishop of Canterbury wrote up the charter to make peace between King John and barons who despised him. Dan Jones explains the history of King John and the Magna Carta in an article he had wrote for the Smithsonian. In his article, “The Mad King and Magna Carta,” the author Dan Jones begins with a short narrative of when he had visited Runnymede. While he was there he found that, “There was little to indicate that we were near the spot where, 800 years ago, King John agreed to a peace treaty with his rebellious barons.” Jones then compares the Magna …show more content…
One significant way in which they vary is that the textbook provides more information on what the empire was like when John’s father, Henry II, was the ruler. The textbook explains how Henry II was the one to setup the courts. The textbook states, “Henry II was especially interested in extending the system of royal justice and employed itinerant judges, who traveled the realm, to render justice. Because these judges began to rely on a “common law” when reaching a decision, people started to look at these royal courts to settle a case, rather than to Church or baronial courts.” In comparison to Jones’ article which only briefly states, “John’s father, Henry II (1133-1189) had been a particularly enthusiastic legal reformer.” The second significant way in which they vary is how they cover King John. The article provides more detail on the actions that made him so hated by the Church and his barons. In his article, Jones explains how John knew how the government and courts worked. Jones lists the various corrupt things King John had done. Jones explains that John “would entangle his barons in massive debts to the crown and then use the courts to strip their wealth.” Jones continues stating, “John also set the military tax known as “scutage,” by which a knight could buy his way out of military service to the crown. And he charged huge fees for his subjects to obtain …show more content…
In his article, Jones uses a formal tone in his writing, which makes it simple for the reader to comprehend the history he is explaining. He begins writing with a narrative style sharing his visit to Runnymede, but then breaks off into an expository style after his experience pushes him to share the history of King John. Jones article completely covers the information starting from John’s life and how it led up to him agreeing to the Magna Carta. The article would be a better choice over the textbook, as it provides a more detailed and descriptive information on John’s life as King of England, including the events that surrounded

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This act places taxes on imported glass, tea, lead, paper, and paint. The money being raised from this act would help pay for the war debt. British Officials used writs of assistance to basically enforce this act. Colonist hated this act because they felt as if it violated their constitutional rights. Therefore, colonist decided to boycott on British goods AGAIN!…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine made sure that his ideas of the Revolution were going to be passed down through generations by writing a book called “Rights of Man”. To summarize what this book is about, Thomas Paine examines the nature of human rights and the potential for nations to secure peace through the adoption of governments based on these rights. In Rights of Man, Thomas Paine…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate regarding this thinker is about how a real republican could write a manual for princely rule. The similarities in these two books concern the methodological approach used by Machiavelli. In both books, Machiavelli discusses the worthiness of rule, and concludes that not everyone deserves to rule especially those who are in power. Moreover both books are said to be the result of personal experience and work and in both The Prince and Discourses, Machiavelli tried to draw conclusions from factual observations of what people actually did; the empirical or inductive method (Gardner…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alongside this, the king increased the taxes to fund the hundred year’s war; the peasants thus led a march on London led by Wat Tyler. The rebellion was a failure, however, as Wat Tyler was arrested early on and Richard II quashed the rebellion by promising a set of reform then going back on his word and ordering harsh punishments for those involved. Alongside this, another instance of the king abusing his feudal rights occurred under the rule of King John. King John ruled England from 1199-1216 and during this time he abused his feudal rights to excess (Magna Carta in Context - the British Library Shop). This began to anger the barons who led a revolt against him.…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Corruption In I Am Malala

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Power can corrupt a leader towards his society. Throughout history some leader have shown their power have pushed to corruption and cruelty to their citizens. In the drama, ¨Antigone¨ written by sophocles and translated by Robert Fagles, Creon astonishingly became leader with the death of Eteocles and Polynices both the next heirs to the throne. Creon quick ascendance to the throne, his good judgment was blinded with power and money that came with the leadership of Thebes. In the autobiography, I Am Malala written Malala Yousafzai and Patricia McCormick is about Malala standing up to her right against the Muslim extremists known as the Taliban that have taken over the Punjab region of Pakistan.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gulliver’s Travels is a mask for his satire toward the English government. His hatred is brought out in this caustic political and social satire at the English people. However, Jonathan Swift divided into four parts to satire on different events. For example, he uses the Lilliputian emperor and empress to ridicule the English leaders. Next, Brobdingnag’s huge giant is much higher morality if compared with English.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Document 4 is a primary source written by an english soldier man, he states that he doesn’t feel free during the french and indian war. In conclusion, the french and indian indian war affected the Britain and American colonies since Britain took control over the rest of the colonies making them have power over all the eastern region. It affected economically since it increased the tax and the colonists weren’t happy with that nor they agreed with it. And it affected ideologically because it created hate and indignation toward the Britain…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the British government as well as its King, began to tax the colonies without fair representation, placed absurd Acts to keep order over the colonists, stationed military in the colonies, and demanded the abolishment of the rights to assemble. Thus, the colonists had more than enough reasons…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout “The Voyage to Brobdingnag,” Jonathan Swift ridicules the Brobdingnag legal system and the foundation of complex laws that they modeled after the English system. Swift is actually mocking the politicians in England while highlighting his perception of the laws of the land. Swift’s parody mocks the politicians and government of his time which remains relevant even today. In depth, Gulliver’s Travels proves to be a symbolic political satire. According to Case; "What is the main design of Gulliver 's Travels ?…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now Cromwell hoped for pacification, a political settlement, and social reform. The army believed that the members of Parliament were corrupt and that a new Parliament should be called. Once again Cromwell tried to mediate between the two antagonists, but his sympathies were with his soldiers. When he finally came to the conclusion that Parliament must be dissolved and replaced, he called in his musketeers and on April 20, 1653, expelled the members from the House. He said they were "corrupt and unjust men and scandalous to the profession of the Gospel"; two months later he set up a nominated assembly to take their place.…

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Superior Essays