A Theory Of Justice John Rawls Analysis

Improved Essays
The Land of the “Free” The United States of America was created to represent the label of “freedom”. This is because the Founding Fathers experienced the injustice of not being able to be represented, hence “no taxation without representation” with the original British colonists. They established a government in which they believed would benefit the greatest number of people and the greatest number of people at the time was white men. The U.S government exemplifies the Utilitarian Position, a theory where the majority is benefitted. John Rawls, in A Theory of Justice, rejects the Utilitarian Position because it does not improve the condition of the least advantaged members of society and in fact, it might even harm them. Rawls was right to reject the idea because when the “greatest number” is being …show more content…
The veil of ignorance goes along with the theory of the original position. The original position is a theory in which a group of people, which would be unaware of their “sex, race, birth, or talent” (Rawls 234), would be able to make decisions on the just and unjust. This is true because even individuals with the best intentions tend to make bias opinions, especially when there is an opportunity he or she can take that will benefit him or her. An example is when white people defended and joined the Civil Rights Movement. The white individuals knew where they were in society, but they did not bother to care. White people fought to make a difference and bring justice to the inequality faced by Blacks. This is the closest example to the veil of ignorance. These brave white people stood up for something that would not benefit them nor hurt them. That is the ideal of the veil of ignorance, a group of people who do not care of the benefits nor the disadvantages that he or she can face when doing the right thing for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the novel, the best example of ignorance is the main character, David Strorm. David is just a kid at this point in the book. All his life he has heard how terrible deviations are, and has had it drilled into his head countless…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    D.E.B Dubois argued that because of the laws and the society that are set for blacks prevents blacks from achieving equality which is known as the color line. The color line represents that because of blacks identify stops blacks from opportunity. An example of this is if you’re a black kid they wouldn’t receive the same education has a white kid. Which means that its stopping blacks from getting a better opportunity in life. The veil represents that because of racism whites find it hard to consider blacks as true Americans.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects Of The Veil

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Veil and its Horrors The Veil created many terrifying effects in the past years, especially on African Americans such as discrimination. African Americans feared the Veil as it damaged their family and segregated them from others. Du Bois felt the Veil separated Africans Americans and whites primarily hurting African Americans. As Du Bois grew up he noticed another side to the way people viewed him as a person.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (McClurg) This book is still one of the most important parts of sociological and African American history. (GradeSaver) In this collection of essays, Du Bois talked about two terms that have developed into theoretical fields of study: “double consciousness” and “the Veil." “Double consciousness" is the belief that the African-American in the United States live with two conflicting identities that cannot be entirely merged together.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    "Oh," thought I, "this is lucky", but even then felt the awful shadow of the Veil, for they ate first, then I---alone" (DuBois 50). A veil is a piece of clothing that conceals the face, this relates to the suppression of the African Americans because whites think they understand the day-to-day life of being black or a slave. They think they know what it feels like to live black to black, but they cannot relate in any aspect. He was confronted with the existence of the veil when DuBois had dinner with a white men and he had to wait for…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his extensive work, “White Ignorance” the Caribbean born social philosopher Charles W. Mills postulates a political theory oppositional to Classical American Academia which cites race, in particular the dominant white race, as the dynamic force behind the ignorance which plagues the gap between multiracial equality. Mills elucidates his argument through a platform of laws from which any individual case may or may not be reputed as resulting from white ignorance. While all races to some degree exhibit a natural tendency judge others customs based on criterion that glorifies their own ways, otherwise known as Ethnocentrism, it is the white man’s variant which has laid the framework for the modern condition of all peoples on Earth. The author…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DuBois coined the term the “veil”, which represented a concept of difference among black Americans in three main parts. First, the veil represented the actual literal difference of skin color between the dark skin of blacks and the very obvious line of the whiteness of white skin. The second part of the veil is the idea that white people have the inability to see the African Americans as “true” Americans. Last, the veil showed the African Americans lack of confidence to see themselves outside of what “white America” stereotypes them to be. DuBois uses this term to show the veil that shades both the white and black views of themselves and one another.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Justice: What is the Right Thing to do by Michael Sandel, the author describes many views in terms of societies. By comparing various philosophers and forms of government, such as utilitarian and libertarian, he provides the good and bad components of each suggestion of government. Thus, through this understanding of each belief, a citizen is better prepared to have a just opinion on issues and play an influential role in their civic duties. In this informative book, Justice, the author neutrally describes many views on today’s government and shows how it has an impact on its citizens. Sandel first begins by presenting the ideas of Utilitarianism and Libertarianism.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This work has made a significant impact on the sociology field today. However, during the time period it was not recognized due to the color of his skin. Bois describes through his essay two terms double consciousness and the veil. He uses the term double consciousness to illustrate the idea to the readers African Americans live with two identities which conflict with one another. Leaving them to feel as if they are living a double life.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whiteness is exposed as perfect, clean and purest of its kind. For instance, Dyer states, “ The media, politics, education are still in the hands of white people, still speak for whites while calming and sometimes sincerely aiming to speak for humanity” (p.11). The reason why whiteness is invisible because the same people in power are white and create obstacles that keep others away for equal opportunity’s. The white race has been the holders of the light in this world. In the article “Failing to see” by Harlon Dalton he states, “ White skin privilege is a birthright, a set of advantages one receives simply by being born with features that society values especially highly” (p.18).…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls believes this is the case for two reasons. One one hand, the calculation results in something everyone in the society should be able to accept. On the other hand, the output also gives us foundation of where we should begin to accept things. A Rawlsian would suggest that we would not be able to get this without an idealized reasoner. The idealized reasoner is someone who has all the traits that Rawls thinks is important for a reasoner would have.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The veil gave rise to double-consciousness; without race-based separation there would be no internal conflict between being both black and an American. However, the veil did provide black Americans with a certain advantage. Du Bois says that “After the Egyptian and Indian, the Greek and Roman, the Teuton and Mongolian, the Negro is a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second-sight in this American world,-a world which yields him no self-consciousness but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world” (Du Bois 2015, [68]). Second-sight is the…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will analyze John Harris’ argument structure in his 1975 article “The Survival Lottery,” then raise an objection to one of his arguments, then I will state what I believe Harris’ response to my arguments would be. After an analysis of Harris’ arguments, I disagree with Harris’ assertion that all lives are equal based on arguments involving society, virtue, and social effect. I believe that Harris would counter with arguments of utilitarianism, legality, and application of the veil of ignorance. Harris concludes through his arguments, a lottery to select those that would be killed for the purpose of organ harvest is not just morally permissible, it is a moral obligation.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that people should be allowed to choose their own conception of the good, the state should not interfere in any way as that would result in infringing on people’s rights to freedom and equality. Rawls tries to combine two key political values in his theory: freedom and equality. He believed…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays