Comparison Of Karl Marx, John Rawls, And Robert Nozick

Great Essays
Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice. Robert Nozick was born …show more content…
A common critique of Marx’s ideas is that without the capitalist economic system there can be no progress, no motivation for people to work, however there are some cultures, for example many Asian countries (Japan) whose culture promotes work ethics not for material incentives but for the sake of recognition and pride.

Rawls John Rawl’s was one of the primary political philosophers of the 20th century, before his book A Theory of Justice, there had been no viable alternative theories to the utilitarian conception of justice which is to maximize happiness for the greatest amount of people. This theory when used to structure a state allows for practical decisions but it also creates a minority that can be disposed of for the benefit of a majority. Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice
…show more content…
Rawls looks at what the proper role of government should be and he begins with the idea that there are primary goods, which include both material goods and goods of rights or opportunities. It is societies job to figure out how to help us cooperate to distribute those goods in a just way. Rawls does not claim that those goods must be distributed equally, unlike Marx, Rawls is advocating for a welfare state not a communist state. Rawls separates the distribution of material goods and rights, and determines that there are certain rights that must be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Rawls’ Theory of Justice, he thinks of Justice as Fairness. Rawls’ thinks the distribution or redistribution of goods is fair, in my opinion, this would depend upon the situation. It’s also stated in Justice as Fairness that “Justice should not be based on Luck of Birth”. Another exert in his text states that the “Veil of Ignorance guarantees that justice will be achieved by the least well-off”. Although some of the things Rawl’s speaks of in his Theory of Justice could possibly be achieved, I beg to differ.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the Marxist solution for distributive justice is the abolition of private property. Wei then analyzes the writing of Rawls and Nozick to show that their positions are actually similar. Nozick and Rawls both agree that private ownership is a natural result of the Marxist principle of “reward according to effort and ability.” The difference between Rawls and Nozick is that Rawls seeks to improve Marx principle of justice by having it operate through “justice as fairness.”…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Title Introduction (Thesis) America’s system of capitalism is a hot bed of inequality. Based on Rawlsian theory America’s current economic system, capitalism, is unjust. In Rawls, Property-Owning Democracy, and Democratic Socialism by Tom Malleson, capitalism is rejected for having unequal political power, unequal opportunity, and unequal wealth distribution. Unequal wealth is the major issue as it affects both political power and opportunity.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over 150 years have passed since the publication of the pamphlet known as the Communist Manifesto. And, ever since its introduction to the general public this very pamphlet has perplexed, intrigued and insulted millions after having been acquainted with the very ideas of note in this title. Causing a major disruption in the Twentieth century, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels provided the roots for the February and October Revolutions in Russia, the War of Liberation in China, as well as the Cold War. Their words have influenced the world in a way that most politicians and evil villains only dream of accomplishing. The affiliation of politics and philosophy through the words of Marx and Engels very much references the ideas of charity and oneness, of socialism and capitalism, and the correct course of action when encountering these ideas in people and government through the eyes of the authors.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once we have stepped behind this boundary we are able to think freely about the nature of social justice. Rawls’ suggests we think this way because by thinking from our emotionally charged subjective biases the truth may be blurred and one may put their values to an advantage in a matter involving who may be guilty or innocent. The idea is to think from pure logic and not be blinded by who we are individually. The two principles consist of the Principle of Equal Liberty and the Difference Principle. The Principle of Equal Liberty follows the egalitarian concept that each person has an equal right to the most extensive liberties compatible with similar liberties for all.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls and Karl Marx both see equality as an important value in human society; indeed, they both see it as something people are entitled to and as the foundation upon which the ideal society is built. However, they diverge drastically in how they conceptualize the way an egalitarian society would operate and how they believe such a society could be achieved. Concerning the former, Marx envisioned a communist utopia, whereas Rawls was a strong believer in liberal democracy. In terms of the latter, Marx was a staunch believer in proletarian revolution, while Rawls believed in perfecting the existing system through democratic reforms. Their contrasting visions stem partly from the different periods in which they wrote.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls holds the belief that people are allowed to keep all they acquire fairly, up to a certain point. That it can not be acquired if it “jeopardizes fair opportunity”, and an individual cannot “enjoy having more than others unless it....benefits the worst off group”12 This is compared to Nozick who holds steadfast in his belief that individuals are entitled to all they have acquired fairly, and that for the state to interfere would be to deny that they themselves are an individual with rights. This absolute ideology is discussed in detail by Michael J. Sandel in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice13, where he expresses that Nozick does not explain his beliefs on possession entirely, saying “Nozick is prepared to accept that people may not deserve their natural assets, but claims they are entitled to them nonetheless”, but does not show why this is so. 14 Sandels point displays a problem with Nozicks priority on the rights to property and his absolutism. The issue is that he does not advocate for what could be a functional society, in which a fair redistribution of all rewards and resources is required, for example in the communitarian sense.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Rousseau 108). Within the first principle of justice, Rawls looks to promote the same principals as Rousseau. They each see the importance of having equal basic liberties for each individual. For Rousseau, equality promotes a political community that protects individuals from problems found in commercial society. For Rawls, equality is central to the fairness and justice that he looks to emphasize.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the piece, “justice as fairness” serves as the basis for the liberal approach to citizenship: Justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice. While a political conception of justice is, of course a moral conception… justice as fairness framed to apply to what I have called the ‘basic structure’ of a modern constitutional democracy. By this structure I mean such a society’s main political, social, and economic institutions, and how they fit together into one unified system of social cooperation. In other words, Rawls believes that a democracy will most efficiently function when each citizen develops their own moral conception of justice and go on to agreeably pursue these conceptions through diverse plans of action.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays