Why Is Trial By Jury Important

Improved Essays
Trial by jury has been prominent among the United States Judicial System since the medieval times. Originating in medieval England, the jury consists of twelve locals in order to decide the fate of the one being tried. Constitutionally, the government cannot revoke someone’s right to life, liberty, and property until the jury is convinced of one’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury is essential in preventing governmental encroachment and ensuring that the rights given by the Constitution are being honored. Thomas Jefferson called the jury “the only anchor ever imaged by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”
The purpose of the jury is basic - decide, based upon factual evidence, one’s guilt or innocence. The verdicts of the jury are supposed to be based solely on evidence, and the
…show more content…
The jury system is not only a problem for America, it is also an issue for other countries as well. South Africa abolished juries in 1969 amid fears of racial prejudice. Russia recently abolished juries for terrorism and treason. Britain, the mother of the trial by jury, is now restricting juries due to fraud. Judge Julius Howard Miner observes that “juries are acquitting notorious criminals where the proof clearly indicated their guilt,” this quote is proven correct in cases such as the O.J. Simpson case, and the Casey Anthony case. In both cases, evidence clearly showcased a guilty verdict, but the juries found both defendants not guilty. The act of replacing the jury with a panel of judges has been suggested due to the burden of jury duty upon jurors. These burdens consist for jurors who must miss work for jury duty, as many companies do not compensate for missed time due to jury duty. Any act of abolishing or replacing the jury creates more power for the government, and is unconstitutional, which is why the jury must be preserved but

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Then the prosecution team gets to interview the jury and has the power to kick some out, so there will be no biased votes. For instance if the suspect is a police officer and one person on the jury is a former police offcier, they will be excused because they might vote in favor just cause of their job. Another reason a person may be kicked off the jury is if they have former connections with them. SO what does this have to do with this case? From these three pieces of evidence, we can clearly see that people now and in the past have manipulated court scenes, juries, and lawyers just to prosecute lives that are innocent.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the last 250 years, U.S. citizens have been given a controversial option of a jury or bench trial. Not everyone agrees with the bench trials. Although jury trials sound like a good idea, it is actually true that bench trials are better because it guarantees the right verdict almost all the time. Jury trials choose ordinary citizens off the street. For example, with the society today, people cannot stay off their phone, which makes them vulnerable to hearing or gathering false details about the trial.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather than giving the boys an experienced defense attorney, the court supplied a Tennessee real estate lawyer that was unfamiliar with the courts of Alabama. Due to this, the court essentially doomed the defendants from the beginning as they would never be able to erect a solid defense case with a lawyer that was both unfamiliar with defense law and Alabama law. Finally, their right to the Sixth Amendment was undermined due to the fact that the court did not provide an impartial jury. An impartial jury is defined as a representative of the community and can not intentionally exclude distinct groups, such as African-Americans, Hispanics, and…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    courts. She also provides multiple examples through history, such as the U.S. revolution and prohibition, where jury nullification has had a large impact on shaping our nation. Insight provided by courtroom professionals benefits both the negative and positive effects of nullification. Diamond’s study puts the issue of nullification into perspective when she explains how rare nullification actually occurs and places trust in our juries because they contain the values that represent our society. Heffernan’s argument for the positive effects of jury nullification seems to outweigh the negative effects.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The power of juries has proven to play a large factor in wrongful convictions, although the jury selection process is meant to select people who won’t nullify or wrongfully convict it still…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Nullification Case

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The two landmark Supreme Court decisions related to race and the death penalty are Lockett v Ohio and Kennedy v Louisiana. In Lockett v Ohio: 21 years old Sandra Lockett, was the getaway driver for a robbery in which resulted in the murder of a pawnshop owner. She was convicted under the statue of Ohio and was found guilty because she initiated the robbery. An Ohio law required that individuals found guilty of aggravated murder be given the death penalty (LOCKETT v OHIO, 2015). She was sentenced to death in April of 1975.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to figures founded by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, between 1993 and 2011, defendants heard in the Supreme Court were acquitted of all charges in 55.4% of judge-alone trials compared with 29% of jury trials. Professor Mark Findlay of criminal justice at Sydney University accredits these exonerations to judges being less likely to be guided by emotion whilst jury members could approach the case subjectively thus hindering the presumption of innocence. Furthermore, juries are becoming increasingly more influenced by social media reports and coverage, risking the procedure of a fair trial and including the possibility of the trial being aborted. The issue of “trial by social media”, recently gaining national attention following the high-profile murder case of Jill Meagher (2012), compromises the accused presumption of innocence and transfers the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defendant. The courts have deemed maintaining the balance of publicity and…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a democratic society, when a person is accused of a crime, they are judged by a group of their peers. Most juries hear testimony, and render a verdict of guilt or innocence, based on evidence and how that evidence violates the established law. Jurors, also possesses the ability nullify a case, if they deem the respective violated law to be unfair. When considering the magnitude of power the ability to nullify places in the hands of twelve randomly selected people, one must consider; whether or not juries should possess the ability to use power of jury nullification. This essay will discuss the notion that twelve randomly selected people should not possess the ability to superseded laws that were established by democratic societies, because…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays