Jury Nullification Case

Superior Essays
The two landmark Supreme Court decisions related to race and the death penalty are Lockett v Ohio and Kennedy v Louisiana. In Lockett v Ohio: 21 years old Sandra Lockett, was the getaway driver for a robbery in which resulted in the murder of a pawnshop owner. She was convicted under the statue of Ohio and was found guilty because she initiated the robbery. An Ohio law required that individuals found guilty of aggravated murder be given the death penalty (LOCKETT v OHIO, 2015). She was sentenced to death in April of 1975. Ohio statue allowed judges in the capital cases to consider only three mitigating factors (Death Penalty Information Center, 2015). The death penalty was mandatory unless the victim provoked the offense, the offense was committed under duress or coercion or the offense was a product of mental deficiencies (LOCKETT v OHIO, 2015). If none of these facts were found then …show more content…
Jury nullification is important to the study of race, class, gender, crime and the administration of justice because it can determine if there 's truly unfair treatment within the judicial system. It can also determine if the judgment of our peers is racially motivated or just. Jury nullification has roots in the English common law and it occurs when a jury believes that the evidence presented at the trial establishes the defendant’s guilt but nonetheless votes to acquit (Walker, Spohn, & DeLone, 2011). An example of jury nullification is the George Zimmerman 's case, in which he was acquitted of murdering an African American teenager. The decision cannot be reversed and he cannot be tried again for the same convictions in the same case. The jury 's decision to acquit, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt, is final they cannot be reversed by the trial judge or buy a pellet court (Walker, Spohn, & DeLone, 2011). In this case jesses was not served and a motor was live free. Now George Zimmerman is out free in the community getting into more trouble than

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Roper Vs Hammons Essay

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Supreme Court case, Roper v Simmons, the justices argued at what age does a person become culpable for their crimes and should receive adult punishments. The respondent, Christopher Simmons, was 17 years old when he and a friend broke into a woman’s home, robbed and tortured her, then killed her by throwing her off a bridge. After being convicted of the crime, Simmons was sentenced to the death penalty, which he eventually revoked. When the case made it to the Supreme Court in 2004, the court came to a 5-4 ruling that executing minors was “cruel and unusual” punishment, thus violating the Constitution (Roper). This case overruled the 1989 case, Stanford v. Kentucky, which previously decided that capital punishment on capital offenders below the age of 18 was not cruel or unusual (Stanford).…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this section, we’re going to go over to the side of the black man, on how sometimes they get accused of a crime they didn’t do. In “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” Huck fakes his death to get away from his alcoholic dad, that took him to a cable out in the middle of nowhere. At the same time, a slave named Jim that belonged to Ms.Watson ran away at the same time of Huck’s disappearance. People of the town thought it was Jim who did it because he ran away at the same time Huck disappeared, but mainly they blamed Jim because he was black. Even though the town knew that Huck’s dad took Huck from Ms.Watson, and they even knew that he was after Huck for his money.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Black and White mock jurors read a transcript of the trial that stated the defendant 's race and celebrity status. Results confirmed a “Black racism” hypothesis, since Black jurors favored Black over White defendants by voting not guilty more often, basically saying they would be more lenient sentences and judging them more positively. In contrast, White jurors did not differentiate between Black and White defendants. The defendant 's celebrity status did not affect verdicts or sentencing but did influence other judgments. These results state that race rather than status more likely influenced with the Simpson…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of “Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmerman” is the court case that encouraged me to pursue my career in law. The case was about a seventeen year old African American male named Trayvon Martin who was fatally shot while walking home. A man named George Zimmerman was claimed to be the shooter who shot and killed Martin. According to the news story Martin was walking home from the local Seven Eleven when Zimmerman encountered him. When asked about the situation Zimmerman claimed that he was unfamiliar with seeing Martin in the neighborhood and said Martin looked suspicious.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Baldus Study

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Here it is evident that the Supreme Court completely ignores its responsibility to protect minorities as prosecutors are granted the ability to use their preemptive strikes in racially- motived ways so long as they do not explicitly state their racism. The Court ruled in Batson v. Kentucky that prosecutors are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race when selecting juries (Alexander, 116). However, prosecutors have found a way to work around this ruling, which has been deemed completely legal by the Supreme Court decision in Purkett v.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juries The jury system has been a part of our society for hundreds of years. It was first created to give all defendants that option to be judged by their peers for their charges instead of by solely a judge. This provides an excellent opportunity to those who feel that their peers can give them a verdict that is not decided by the professional judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury nullification is a way of people showing what they think about a law: The ultimate purpose of any true justice system is to help society by removing and punishing people that are dangerous to it. Specifically, all democratic regimes are based on the idea of people possessing the power, believing that leaving the government to society itself is the best way to go about making decisions because the people are competent and are the best at knowing what is good for them. Keeping jury nullification allows the people to show what they think about a law. For example, if many marijuana cases were nullified this would be a clear indication that the people don"t think these laws are good for society, the laws need to be altered, or the sentences are unreasonable. Consider this, laws are made for the good of society so if society feels like a law is not beneficial the law's purpose is undermined.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Worst of the Worst,” by Patrick Radden Keefe is a story told about Judy Clarke, a defense attorney who does whatever she can to save the most notorious killers’ lives. Throughout the story, Keefe demonstrated how Judy Clarke is indeed one of a kind. Clarke selects the criminals no one wants to defend, such as rapists, psychotic kidnappers, and mass murderers. In all cases but one did Clarke successfully convince the jury to spare the criminal’s life.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty is a highly contested issue in the United States that has been put forth to the Supreme Court many times. The Court operated under the assumption that is due process is observed, life can be taken from an individual. However, the court 's opinion of the death penalty has changed over time. In 1972, the Court considered Furman v. Georgia, a case involving a white man who murdered a black man.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In finding him not guilty of murder or manslaughter the jury agreed that Mr. Zimmerman could have been justified in shooting Mr. Martin because he feared great bodily harm or death (New York Times). Zimmerman was arrested again on November 18th, 2013…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IV. For Nullification Based on the tacit allowance of jury nullification that is present today, and the stated allowance of it in death penalty cases, jury nullification should be brought out of the darkness and instated as a right in trials. The benefits of jury nullification are clear, and include the fact that juries can respond to unanticipated circumstances in the moment that laws cannot and that they can look at exigent circumstances and choose to grant a defendant freedom when those circumstances are clear. There are three main ways that nullification should be made known and legal.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A reason that supports the idea of scrapping the jury system is the lack of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The article Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice system was written in December, 1995 in a Yale Law Journal by Paul Butler, and than later republished in 2015 in Introduction to Legal Studies. This article was published in North America, for academics in law stream, or anyone with an interest in law. The author poses different views on the racism in todays court rooms faced by African American, particularly by the men. In this essay, I will be analyzing this case from the perspective of white girl so I really can’t say shit on the subject.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays