The Influence Of Violence: The Jim Crow Laws

Improved Essays
What if everything was to be decided and solved by using only one of the two? Sword is the violence that has been used by people who don’t think there’s a more peaceful way to solve things, like in wars, it’s either one person thinks they need to use force or both may think that, to just prove their point or get what they want. But if an event that has violence, the pen is used throughout to help it. It is runned by what you know about who you're going against. It’s knowledge that controls the field, and what one know can be used as an advantage.

During the Civil Rights movement, violence and words have been used. The Jim Crow Laws, are laws that people must follow. The laws controlled actions, limiting what can be done, but it also allowed
…show more content…
News on websites, newspapers, television, Facebook, spread fast because many people see what information is shared through it,though it can be true or false. News itself can be controlled, limiting on what people know. Controlling the knowledge of something, controls what a person thinks and knows, they only know how to use force, they use force for most things they do. There was this News, saying Ebola has spread to the U.S in Texas, it was fake, but people believed it spreading the fake news around. It’’s only one story, that can control what you think, and that’s all they would think about.

“Through violence you may ‘SOLVE’ one problem, but you sow the seeds for another.” -Dalai lama. Violence can cause more problems, instead of solving them. Words can make you be heard, telling someone a problem, coming up with more than one solution. In school you answer and try to solve a problem that you are given, when you work in a group, you gain more knowledge if you share it. But bullying in school, creates problems for the bully and the one being bullied, and to solve it, it relies on people to tell them to stop, it involves more

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    when the Civil Rights Movement was going on violence was the only thing that surrounded us. At the time churches were being bombed. We had houses that were being bombed. At every give moment someone was either being verbally put down or some sort of violence was going on. Some differences between the two moves are quite obvious.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The definition of the Jim Crow Laws is defined as laws of segregation and disenfranchisement that effected the south of the United States in the 1890’s (PBS, n.d.). With these laws in progress, it separated the black community from the white community by placing detail signs over water fountains, bathrooms, and schools letting the black community and the white community know that specific place was either “whites only” or “colored”. (PBS, n.d.). The two following narratives Willie Ann Lucas and James Hall, remember what the segregation laws were like for them and how it affected their everyday lives, and allowed them to overcome the obstacles thrown their way. Willie Ann Lucas was interviewed on July 7th 1995 in Brinkley, Arkansas by interviewer…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important for conflicts to be solved through means other than violence, because violence causes harm. Clearly, it is not good to put others’ in harm. It is always better to just talk things out. Violence does not solve anything, in fact, it only creates more issues. Some of these issues include trust and forgiveness.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From my own personal experience, bullying isn’t just a problem that will go away if ignored and it’s only going to get worse. That’s why it’s become essential to pay attention and intervene in bullying so that it gets better and not…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Meryn Osbaugh Civil Rights Essay Prompt #3 AP Government Period 5 The Jim Crow laws were statutes enacted by the Southern states in the 1880’s which legalized segregation between black and whites. In 1896 in Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that using segregated facilities for whites and blacks was constitutional and encouraged the creation of discriminatory laws. Facilities like railways, streetcars, public waiting rooms, restaurants, boarding houses, theaters, public parks were segregated. Lesser quality and separated schools, hospitals, and other public institutions, were left for blacks.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third paragraph inquires about beneficial aspects of nonviolence, claiming that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence”. It also contributes by stating, “nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive”, allowing for a peaceful and innocent reputation to help achieve success within a conflict. Contrarily, paragraph four explains the detrimental effects of pure rapid violence. Creating animosity and pain, futile violence results in “escalated” issues with “many injuries”, “deaths”, or “demoralization”. Chavez applies a compare and contrast method in order to lure the audience towards his personal mindset, which particularly favors nonviolence.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Too Hard to Believe: The New Jim Crow:Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness The New Jim Crow would be the other word that describes the part of time where many African American people did not have their rights and were living a life that made them feel like they are nothing. The New Jim Crow has been known between everyone because of its importance to our lives. Michelle Alexander who is an associate professor of law at the Ohio State University, a civil right advocate and a writer, described how African American people in the age of Colorblindness lived and suffered because discrimination was widespread around that time. Alexander explains in her book how African American would always be entitled as felons for crimes that they did not do against white people who actually commit crimes but get away with it because of their skin color.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow reveals how the War on drugs and the current legal system in the United States has been designed as a new caste system: mass incarceration. The current system of mass incarceration in the US mirrors earlier systems of racialized social control through racial segregation, political origin, and how race is defined in America. Mass incarceration and previous caste systems like Jim Crow have historical parallels with each other. Politically mass incarceration and jim crow were created by white elites to exploit poor and working class whites anger and racial bias for political and economic gain. Jim Crow used segregation laws were created to defect anger and opposition from white elites to african…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A Jim Crow law is a complex system of laws and customs that separates races from each other. Jim crow laws were unfair and foul to the colored race because many of the laws made their lives harder and the laws didn't balance their rights equally. They are not allowed to drink from the same water fountain and some laws state that they are not allowed to go to the same schools. Occasionally, colored people will get the rejected or the undesired facilities. An example of a Jim Crow law would be that white and colored students must use separate textbooks.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim Crow laws were very discriminatory towards African Americans in the 1800s-1960s and had a huge impact on education, voting, and what our society…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim Crow Laws not only affected African Americans but also it was also against young people, females, mentally retarded people, anyone who was not Christian, and basically anyone who was not white. The Jim Crow Laws were laws of hatred and did not discriminate who the hate was directed towards. Even after slavery was abolished in 1865, most slaves did not go far. When the slaves were first abolished they didn’t know what to do because they didn’t know anything else. They also had no money at all or anywhere to go, just the clothes on their backs.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, what if a conflict can’t be resolved? One needs to be able to resort to violence. Benjamin Franklin could have learned this principal from Machiavelli and Sun…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim Crow Laws

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Civil War, black people were freed and became citizens, but they did not have the same rights as white people. “The Jim Crow Laws were statutes enacted by Southern states, beginning in the 1880s that legalized segregation between African-Americans and whites” (American Historama). “The Jim Crow Laws were not just a law that separated whites and blacks, but it was also “a way of life” (David Pilgrim). These laws made life for African-Americans extremely difficult; the next paragraph will describe how difficult life was for them. African-Americans were citizens of the United States, but they did not have the same rights as white Americans.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The civil rights movement was a mass movement against racial segregation and discrimination. Even though African Americans were freed from slavery, their social status was still not the same as White Americans, especially in the South. Blacks were not given equal opportunities in their education, job opportunities, or allowed to access white facilities. The Jim Crow Laws were established in 1874 and lasted until 1975. They were laws created intended “to separate the white and black races in the American South” (“Jim Crow Laws”).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Violence Wrong

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I think Violence is a solution to resolving conflict, one because sometimes people take too much, house wise and street wise, a great example is Bullying when people get Fed up after they get Beat every Day they think Violence is not okay, but yet it’s okay for the Bullies to do it. Violence is not okay sometimes you can’t just approach it, otherwise if someone is trying to cause Harm on you or if someone just wants to pick a fight with you it’s okay to Fight back. Sometimes people try showing of in front of friends by approaching the kids they know are not going to do nothing about it, it’s okay to fight back when you had have enough.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays