The Influence Of Somin's View On The Supreme Court

Improved Essays
Somin’s view on the Supreme Court is one of the more optimistic points of view. Somin believes that the Supreme Court has the power they need to act effectively in today’s society. Somin brings up cases like Plessy v. Ferguson to prove the point that when the court sits back it allows for oppressive laws to stand. Somin believes that the Supreme Court has enough power in itself to stop oppressive laws and give the minorities a voice. Kramer believes the Supreme Court has too much power. That the people should be the ones deciding what they want not the Court, he wants “We, the People” to be more than an opening line. Kramer believes that Supreme Court has too much power in deciding who has rights and what is right.
Klarman’s point of view

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mighty Judgement Summary

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Mighty Judgement, Philip Slayton talks about the Supreme Court of Canada as a government institution which needs reform on the premises that Supreme Court of Canada is powerful, paternalistic, competent, undemocratic, and secretive. Slayton begins with the question of whether judges make or interpret the law and whether they should be doing only one of those things. Also, he describes the historical past of the Supreme Court, and how the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms affected the cases which reach the Supreme Court. Slayton also analyzed the Supreme Court of Canada and came up with possible overdue reforms based on his experience as a lawyer, academic, and a previous Supreme Court clerk.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffery Toobin Analysis

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As two individuals that practice law, Richard A. Bierschbach and Jeffery Toobin, who are two distinctively different authors have very similar views on the United States Constitution. Richard A. Bierschbach and Jeffery Toobin have composed two compelling articles on the United States Constitution. In Richard A. Bierschbach’s “Fragmentation and Democracy in The Constitutional Law of Punishment” and Jeffery Toobin’s “Our Broken Constitution” their rhetorical strategy to persuade know their audience very well. Toobin writes for the average reader who mainly wants a quick way to learn about a topic. Bierschbach is writing to educate people who are practicing law or professor to teach college students.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between the years of 1961 to 1966, known as the due process revolution, the Supreme Court took an active role in the law, which lead it to be consider the givers and not the interpreters. (Swanson, Territo, & Taylor, 2017). The due process revolution, was a response to courts being accused of denying criminals their rights. Thus, in turn, the assimilation of the Bill of rights happened.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proper Interpretation (Meese) The interpretation of the Constitution has been a controversial issue between people in the government. In A Jurisprudence of Original Intention by Edwin Meese III, Meese provides an article with the intention of telling his audience the importance of interpreting the Constitution properly. Meese highlights the idea that all courts in the United States have to base their decisions strictly from the Constitution. It is evident that Meese wants a strict interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America stands for justice, nevertheless, equality but the Judicial Branch possess an amount power over Congress that overshadows this statement. The Judicial Branch consists of three levels; the District Courts, Court of Appeals and uppermost power, the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the Senate and Executive branch have the choice of who maintains the position of Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court still has the ability to subdue the other branches. Revealed in the United States Constitution, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision, in addition to a 2005 Political cartoon, it is evident that the Supreme Court subjugates the Executive and Legislative Branch.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The supreme court of Canada exists to provide an unbiased body ensuring that the laws of the land uphold the rights and freedoms of the Charter. Though the Supreme Court acts as a system of checks and balances on the executive power of Canada, at what point does the system of the court give the judiciary too great a level of power? When acknowledging the constitutions and legislature in which the Supreme Court justices gain and hold their power, s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the lack of equal representation in the court, it is indisputable that the highest court in Canada is overly powerful. It is evident through the examination of court rulings and the systemic practices of the judiciary that the Supreme Court of…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In theory, the Supreme Court is meant to be the unbiased force in the United States. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the Supreme Court Justices have a noticeable bias towards their political parties. Unlike Congress, where the political bias from the representatives is expected, the Supreme Court is not meant to have a political leaning. The Constitution states the purpose of the Supreme Court is meant to interpret the Constitution in the most apolitical way possible. However, this is a very recent issue that has developed.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has made a lot of important decisions that impact the lives of United States citizens every day. If I would have to summarize what I have learned from the United States Government class in very few words, it would have to be that the justice system was built to be fair and just for everyone and that the government structure was framed to be as effective as it can be. Even though history has shown more than once that the system can be exploited and government corrupt, like any system and governing body can, it still comes to show that it is effective and was put in place with the people in mind. There was a point in time where the two collided and one of the more important rulings of the Supreme Court has been made. I am talking…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nominating a Supreme Court Justice is an incredibly important job, it could give your party a majority on the bench. Therefore, Presidents have attempted at nominating justices who agree with them on issues and belong to the same party as them. However, history has proven to be a disappointment for those who nominate Justices based on ideology (Dorsen). Republicans seems to face the most disappointment with two of the current Justices, John G. Roberts and Anthony M. Kennedy moving more to the left since being placed on the bench. However, it was Justice Earl Warren who became to be known as the most disappointing Justice for the Republicans.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a system that exclusively benefits the oppressors, not the oppressed, making it an immoral system of public policy. This book demonstrates that public policy reflects society’s stance on a certain issue, through public opinion or indifference. Although Atticus demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that Tom had not harmed Mayella Ewell in any way, the jury still found him guilty, due to their pre-conceived notions of the character of African Americans. When Scout mentions the four types of people in the world, she refers to established racial and economic hierarchies, where African Americans are at the bottom of the ranking (p. 226). During the trial Atticus reminds the jury that the law is the “great leveler”, that the courtroom is the one place where all men are created equal (p. 205).…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays