Argumentative Essay On Privacy And Security

Great Essays
By birth, we are commended rights as citizens of our nation. With liberty, we are freed from the weights of chains that’s been inflicted by the authority. However, by justice we all are granted equality. To secure our privileges in life things are given and sacrificed for an expense. By undertaking and acknowledging one we unconsciously relinquish the others. Two rights that has always conflicted with each other are security and the freedom of our privacy. On December 2, 2015, a terrorist attacks have reignited the sparks that 's been subsiding for years. Due to the San Bernardino shooting, the FBI are overturning privacy to amplify security. In this case our privacy is taken for less freedom. But to ensure the elevation of surveillance, a …show more content…
Fast Time author Neal Ungerleider compared this case to the pandora 's box. It’s something that shouldn’t be taken lightly or toyed around with. But due to the eagerness to obtain knowledge the box is forced open and unpredictable measures begin to shape and appear. The FBI demands should be rejected for several reasons. Even though they want to attempt to prevent future terrorist attacks, opening up a backdoor into everybody’s phone will not work. Terrorist attacks aren’t predictable and having the privileges to obtain any information, the government will have the most powerfulest weapon on their side. If the courts did provide the FBI their wish, imagine them being able to observe anybody information without them knowing. It’s almost as inviting the whole government into your house with all of your secrets on the table for them to pick and choose which to exploit to the …show more content…
14 citizens were killed due to the shooting, yet Apple wouldn’t decide to help the FBI. Apple is looked at as a bully, and denying the request from the FBI has started a small war about human rights. People only fear that creating a method to obtain data would fall into the wrong hands, however, with highly specialized encryption every phone user could become a potential threat. We pledge allegiance to our country for security, and honor a code to help the government protect the people. With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security. If those that are serving our country isn’t allowed to fully operate, unnecessary conflict will occur which will not only affect the U.S but become a worldwide problem. Terrorist are viewed as people that have given up their rights, therefore obtaining their information shouldn’t be questioned unless the company supports

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And my evidence is that only about 51% say that is should be unlocked and about 39% people say that they should not unlocked the phone. But the Apple company is like they should not give the software to the FBI but if they lose the case they will have to unlock the phone. But then the Apple company is have trouble with the FBI but the Apple company has some rules so that they will not unlock the phone. I wonder if the Apple company will still make a updated phone so that the FBI will not get in people phone any more. But I hope the FBI will leave the Apple compon alone and just find some hacker to open it.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that Apple needs to think about the bigger picture here. If you are dead you can’t use a phone. Apple keeps saying that creating a back door will put everyone at risk and how the software doesn’t exist that no one has access to that. I look at it this way, there are people who made the security wall for the iPhone. If they know to construct it they know exactly how to deconstruct it.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Comey, the FBI director, discussed that this problem should not be solved by a company that sells phones or by an agency that protects citizens but rather by the people their trying to protect. It should be up to the American people to choose what means more to them, security or privacy (Willens, 6). On the contrary, Apple believes that creating a back door could potentially cause the FBI to use that backdoor for evil. They would be allowed into anyone’s iPhone whether they were allowed to or not. Also, they could allow spyware onto users phones at any time.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the words of James Comey, “encryption on mobile devices effectively left law enforcement dark to emerging threats”(Comey). If encrypted technologies are inhibiting the state’s ability to protect us, in even the slightest way, is where his view would change. At this point there is a grey area of opinion would begin for him. Encryption protects us to a point, but then hinders the ability of the state department to protect us; however, if encryption were to be outlawed citizens would arguably be even more vulnerable to the increasing amount of dangerous…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Response Essay Rewrite In recent times, Apple and the FBI have been arguing over the creation of software that would be able to reveal encrypted information. The author of the article Biting Apple Bruises Privacy Rights, argues the idea that by forcing Apple to hack their product will result in future violations of security and privacy. Personally, I strongly agree with the writer’s belief that forcing companies to reveal secured information is completely unwarranted and should not be allowed under any circumstance. To begin, if the government were to force companies to reveal secured information, it would lead to further unwarranted or corrupt information gathering. There is no way for Apple to completely restrict the software so it would…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [11] If customers find out about this sabotage they will stop updating their phone and either way the customer lose because they become prone to attacks with outdated protection. If Apple reputation takes a hit, customers who rely on Apple for security and privacy will choose to buy phones outside the country because foreign phone companies are not mandated to follow America’s courts or laws. [12] [13] In essence, The FBI will financially harm Apple’s business by helping boost sales for smart phone providers outside the U.S. This act will not only cost Apple billions, but has the potential to destroy the economic security of the tech sector for American companies. [14] Therefore, Apple should not comply with the warrant because the company is not a public utility working to serve the public interest.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The FBI operates so they can get whatever they need from a company, whether it 's an encryption key or any additional needed information, they fail to keep in mind that these demands will deteriorate a majority of these companies customer’s privacy. In addition, the FBI has seemingly been aware that any backdoor operating system created would not only operate for this particular suspect 's IPhone. Source D, states “ Once created(backdoor operating system), the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices.”this means that once he FBI obtains this new IOS system, they would not have to ask for it again in another situation similar to…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the government be allowed to force a company to unlock its secrets? Apple should not have to give the FBI access to their secrets because it opens a backdoor for hackers. These Apple vs the FBI cases are subjective realities because what we believe in alters our perception of the nature of things. The FBI says that they are fighting for safety and that if we want them to protect us we have to give up some of our rights to privacy. They want to decide how much we give and to whom we are giving it to.…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Senator Richard Burr says, “We are on the floor today talking about taking away some of the tools that have been effective in helping us thwart attacks. It is the wrong debate to have” (“Pros and Cons”). Security and stability in life come with the appropriate protections and preparations. Allowing surveillance to provide security to the country will save people from having to worry about major terrorist attacks, such as 9/11, from happening again. Also, technology is advancing in every part of the world, so it would be a waste not to make use of the resources under America’s possession, especially when every other country could be using it against American citizens.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, Patriot Act gave the FBI to increase entitled to spy on people which strip human rights. The government should always think that people was innocent before they found guilty and it supposed not to have privilege above the law. However, the Patriot Act did in an opposite way about looking people of what they had done before they were sentenced. Americans couldn’t be investigated based on the First Amendment, which states that human has the freedom speech. The government could monitor on people religious and political institutions, which people had to think before they speak out because the government had the power to judge it without any evidence.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays