Rhetorical Analysis: FBI Vs. Apple, By Mitch Albom

Superior Essays
Mitch Albom, author of “Mitch Albom: FBI vs. Apple about more than a phone”, builds an overall effective editorial that supports the readers point of view by fighting for the protection of our phone information. In this case, a man named Syed Farook, killed and injured several people, including his wife. The FBI believes that accessing information from his phone may be able to help them with their case. They order Apple to build a new software that will allow them to bust into phones by being able to guess passwords as many times as they want; as of now, someone can only guess a password 10 times before the information is lost. In court, the FBI fights that the law requires businesses not involved in the case, have to execute court orders. …show more content…
These rhetorical appeals are some of the most important devices to have in a persuasive paper to capture both factual information and an appeal to the reader’s emotions. An example of a logical appeal, “Apple’s defenders cite a 1977 Supreme Court case that says the government cannot place “unreasonable burdens” on a third party to assist law enforcement” (Albom 2). This supports the citizen’s side of the argument by presenting factual information on why the FBI has no right to force Apple to build this software. Facts and statistics help gain the audiences trust and make a convincing defense. Albom strengthens his argument using pathos by saying, “…with an encryption code to protect its customers’ information — your information — from falling into the wrong hands: hackers, crooks, identity thieves, etc” (Albom 1), because it strikes the connection that people have with their phones to trigger the reader’s sense of emotional safety. Lastly for the ethical appeal, Mitch Albom is a columnist for the Detroit Free Press making his article both reliable and valid. People would choose to believe a columnist over someone that does not have the credentials and information that Albom has. Imputing these powers of persuasion, the author captures the readers senses to gain their …show more content…
The authors tone can be one of the most important things to have in an essay or article because it illustrates how the author feels toward the subject. Tone can either capture the interest of the audience, or kill it. In the statement, “Yet inside that small device now swirls a critical debate over our privacy” (Albom 1), Albom uses certain words to express his tone. For example, using the word “critical” sets across that the author feels this situation is extremely important. Also, using the word “our” lets the reader know that the author feels for the perspective of all citizens in the U.S. This will largely appeal to the audience since it is a matter of people’s safety. Another example, “The FBI now wants Apple to build new software it doesn’t currently have to do something it can’t currently do — poison the iPhone with malware to change the operating system and enable the FBI to make as many brute-force password guesses as it needs” (Albom 1), expresses how the author feels about the counterargument. Using words like “poison” and “malware” creates a negative image on the FBI’s side of the argument. Using tone and diction the author coveys that he does not approve how the government would be able to invade innocent people’s information at the click of a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    After reading the article “Apple vs. The United States Government,” I agree with Apple’s stance. The San Bernardino shooting was a very tragic event that occurred last December and I do understand where the FBI is coming from, but they cannot expect Apple to risk the privacy of their customers.. There are many reasons why I agree with Apple’s stance. Smartphones have become a very sufficient part of people's lives, and we depend on them for almost everything. We have put forth our trust in these phones, by relying on them to keep all of our private information.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    IPhone Unlock Debate In resent weeks the FBI has attempted to make Apple come up with a way to unlock the San Bernardino shooters IPhone. The FBI wants to know if the shooter had any plans before that might have been kept in secret on his phone. Although this would give Americans peace at mind Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, refuses to make a so-called “back door” to the phone for security and privacy reasons. Tim says that making a way to get into a locked device without erasing valuable information would be extremely dangerous if it got into the wrong hands.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Apple Vs. The FBI Case

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people use some sort of smartphone whether it be Apple or Android. Only one is having an issue with the FBI. The Apple v.s. the FBI case has been deliberately discussed by many and nobody is in the grey area. You’re either on Apple’s side or the FBI’s side. The FBI found an Iphone left at the San Bernardino terrorist attack site and it was locked.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A lot of crimes have been committed in the United States and around the world in which an IPhone is involved. In some instances the Iphone has a lot of evidence which can help solve the case but law enforcement officers such as the FBI are not able to get access to the phone because of its powerful encryption. It is very frustrating on the part of the FBI because they know that since the phone is an Apple product, Apple can give them access to penetrate the phone but Apple is unwilling to compromise. In some instances The FBI has passed through the court to force Apple to open the phone for them but they have not succeeded. One point of view is that Apple should not be refusing to unlock iPhone when it comes to criminal matter because by doing…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Iphone Hack Thesis

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truth About The iPhone Hack The tech giant Apple refused to disclose the security encryption key for the cell phone of the San Bernardino terrorist. The result was a court order filed against Apple by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Apples refusal to cooperate with the FBI was based on a controversial principle regarding the personal security of an estimated 100-million iPhone users around the world. The court order was lifted when a professional hacker stepped forward and broke the code on behalf of the Feds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple vs. FBI, were talking here about people’s secure privacy vs. nation’s security in terrorism. In this controversy, it’s tough making a decision because both are fighting for their reasonable decisions for overall the nation. However, Apple’s product isn’t just centered here is USA, but worldwide, to some degree this should be put into perspective to where this issue is going towards. Personally, I believe that the FBI is trying to go beyond with this case and in depth to unfold more issues than just to resolve one case from one iPhone it will affect everyone’s civil liberties. I tend to be on the side of Apple in this case.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States Vs. Apple Inc. In February of 2016 the court case of the United States vs. Apple came heavily into headlines. Earlier in the year the FBI had issued an order to apple for the help of unlocking the phone of a terrorist that killed 14 and injured 22 people. Apple declined the order on the basis's of breaking user privacy and the excessive efforts that would be required to by the current encryption codes.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The feud between Apple and the FBI has received a substantial amount of media coverage lately. The legal arguments for each side appear to be equally laudable, which impelled investigate on my own. I decided to explore the question of whether or not Apple should produce a back-door to assist in the FBI’s investigation. The FBI, which initiated the debate, argued that Apple has to comply citing the All Writs Act of 1789. Apple refuses to comply stating that if the back-door was to be produced and fell into the wrong hand the nations privacy rights would be out risk.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Justice Department requested Apple to assist the FBI in unlocking Farook’s encrypted iPhone to further the investigation and possibly find evidence linking to other terrorists. This created a national concern for companies/ corporations like Apple who have policies to protect and respect the consumer’s privacy. This also concerned anyone owning a smartphone and/ or computer, those with access to a search engine, and the government themselves. Despite the rarity of this case, this is not the first situation in which the privacy of an individual has been at war with the safety of a nation.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive writing is a difficult task for many authors as it requires the integration of various techniques. These techniques may include but are not limited to connotations, analogies, and imagery- all being manipulated to ensure that the audience is being seduced. The techniques as the aforementioned ones are manipulated in the sense that the author uses them to support themselves. The author may use different words to increase the impact, or use the imagery of words in order to make the situation seem realistic. Increasing the reality of an argument through the aforementioned tactics, as well as many more will promise a successful persuasive essay.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple is refusing to comply with the F.B.I. because they want to unlock an iPhone that was used by Syed Rizwan Frook, who was killed by the police along with his wife, they arrange a mass shooting in san Bernardino, California and they kill fourteen people. Apple does not want to unlock the iPhone because it would threat the privacy of its customers. Apple should refuse to unlock the iPhone for the F.B.I. because it would invade privacy of its customers. It is illegal to spy on people phones because they have personal information that they do not want to share with others.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author persuades the audience by using analogies, allusions, and metaphors, by using statistics and facts, by asserting ideas through powerful language, and by tying the whole argument together using the single Texas law to exemplify other laws throughout the United States. This article shows how authors can use multiple rhetorical devices at once to increase the persuasiveness of their writing. While it may seem the editorial is about a single law, the underlying argument pertains to the ruling made in the court decision of Roe v. Wade: whether or not access to abortion means an unrestricted right to…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The viewpoints held by persuasive writers are often different from each other’s, sometimes even polar opposites, but the one thing all persuasive writing has in common is the use of rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos help authors convince readers of a point using credibility to impress the reader, reason and logic, and emotion to appeal to the reader’s sympathy. However, overuse of certain appeals can lead to an unreliable argument. Logos is the most reliable, as logos depends on facts, but information may still be twisted. Ethos deals with the credibility of the author, publisher, or a source from the writing, but sometimes credentials can blind readers; just because someone is an expert in a subject does not mean he or she is infallible.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The dilemmas Cook faced, discussed in the case study (Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016), were as follows:Unlocking the terrorist’s iPhone and building a backdoor for the national security – Cook and Apple faced a dilemma in helping the U.S. government and the FBI unlock the iPhone of one of the terrorists who attacked victims in San Bernardino, California that had potential to reveal the terrorist ’s motives of the attack as well as evidences of terrorist networks and trails of activities (Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016). Unlocking the iPhone became such a heated dispute because the terrorists had tried to destroy evidences that could turn into revealing their digital trace, and the iPhone, issued by the terrorist’s employer, San Bernardino County, was found…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: “The Danger of Silence” Silence is a phenomenon that is not always easy to comprehend. In some cases, it is part of human nature to remain silent even when it is necessary to find the courage to speak. This idea is what Clint Smith discusses in his TEDTalk entitled, “The Danger of Silence”, where he explains how important it is to speak out against the injustices that have taken reign over the world today. Smith uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to convey his idea by developing significant verbal and visual elements in the video. He utilizes carefully chosen descriptions to reinforce specific appeals throughout the text to convince the listener to spend every day as if there were a microphone hidden underneath his…

    • 1353 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays