Apple And The FBI Case Analysis

874 Words 4 Pages

The feud between Apple and the FBI has received a substantial amount of media coverage lately. The legal arguments for each side appear to be equally laudable, which impelled investigate on my own. I decided to explore the question of whether or not Apple should produce a back-door to assist in the FBI’s investigation. The FBI, which initiated the debate, argued that Apple has to comply citing the All Writs Act of 1789. Apple refuses to comply stating that if the back-door was to be produced and fell into the wrong hand the nations privacy rights would be out risk. While the issue seems to be very compartmentalized it has national implications. The Apple and FBI feud represents the larger conflict of the clash between the necessary and proper …show more content…
This adds an interesting twist to the FBI’s intentions, if they could hack it without Apple knowing, then why show their hand. Although this conspiracy may have some validity it bears little importance. After examining the laws and the initial arguments I decided to find the potential solutions to the debate. This debate could turn out in numerous ways, but there are three main solutions. (1) The FBI can stand by their writ and wait for the court system to enforce it. Therefore, they will get the back-door and retrieve the needed information from the iPhone. (2) Apple can continue to refuse the writ and can counter argue that the writ was issued under false logic. Apple can bring up the idea I mentioned earlier that the All Writs Act of 1789 is outdated or they could argue that the back-door is too dangerous to create, then the FBI would have to hack it on their own. Lastly, (3) Apple can only comply if the FBI allows the oversite of Apple executives, therefore they would create the back-door and then immediately destroy it. The last option is most likely not going to occur simply because Apple’s main argument is based around the idea that the back-door is too dangerous. If I have understood the information that I have read properly, I would assume that Apple will win out over the FBI and will not have to …show more content…
I understand that Apple can refuse to comply, but can they legally do that? Can a writ be refused without punishment and then reissued? I would like to see how this plays out. The sources that I have examined only reaffirm my support of privacy rights. The debate between the FBI and Apple has national implication and needs to be solved properly, if the case is argued ignorantly it could set the precedent for numerous following

The FBI And The First Amendment

The previous judges in the cases have expressed that code can be considered a form of speech. What the FBI wants Apple to do is write a new code, which is considered a form of speech. It violates the First Amendment rights as forcing speech and going against Apples interests. Gross also continues by saying that Apple is also arguing that this should not be forced upon them because the FBI has not proven that useful information will be found on the phone, it has only been speculated. According to Gross, “The Fifth Amendment protects U.S. residents against the government taking away their liberty” (Gross).…

Words: 1642 - Pages: 7

The Importance Of Terrorist Attacks

The FBI is not trying to put Apple Company at stake. They said it’s about making sure Americans aren’t in jeopardy, about fighting terrorists who are using increasingly sophisticated communication tools, and about a reasonable request to gain evidence from a single iPhone. (Hollister) If the FBI could get into this phone it could give insight on other possible attacks that could be coming or even past attacks. If the couple was plotting this attack with other foreigners the FBI would know exactly who to target. Federal agents don’t know the passcode to the phone and their running the risk of erasing all the data.…

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

The Importance Of Security And The Freedom Of Our Privacy

Yet, being indistinct they were denied the support they requested. To gain access, the FBI would have to decrypt the system of the device without causing the evidence to self-destruct. Without having their way to access the data of the enemy, the FBI decided to force Apple through the courts. If granted the permission to dominate Apple, every technological resource would be in jeopardy not only to the FBI but hackers, terrorist groups, rival countries, and ect. Confidential information could become universal information, and secrets will become known.…

Words: 1810 - Pages: 8

Apple Vs. FBI: Do You Need Privacy?

Apple helping FBI with one iPhone was just a slippery slope because Apple pointed out that NY alone has 175 iPhone that needs to be unlocked and the Government wants Apple 's help. In the court ruling process, earlier case ruling can be used as guidance for a future ruling. Once a court ruled one way, another court follows that as precedence. Apple does not want to set any dangerous precedents by creating a backdoor in iOS so that FBI can use that case as precedence to force other tech companies to cooperate with FBI in such a way which may not be in the company or their customers ' best…

Words: 1710 - Pages: 7

The Olmstead Case Study

[11] If customers find out about this sabotage they will stop updating their phone and either way the customer lose because they become prone to attacks with outdated protection. If Apple reputation takes a hit, customers who rely on Apple for security and privacy will choose to buy phones outside the country because foreign phone companies are not mandated to follow America’s courts or laws. [12] [13] In essence, The FBI will financially harm Apple’s business by helping boost sales for smart phone providers outside the U.S. This act will not only cost Apple billions, but has the potential to destroy the economic security of the tech sector for American companies. [14] Therefore, Apple should not comply with the warrant because the company is not a public utility working to serve the public interest.…

Words: 2258 - Pages: 10

Pandora's Box Of Cyberspace Case Study

Apple was resilient against the federal government for the protection of their users. The FBI unlawful overstepped boundaries as a government official. Vivek Wadhwa was quoted in “Apple-FBI battle over San Bernardino terror attack investigation: All the details” saying “Apple is obstructing law enforcement’s [investigation] and effectively aiding terrorists [since] they changed [their] technology” to purposely limit the access of the FBI. Apple has the right to change their intellectual property. Apple was enhancing their security to meet the growing demands of their users and to protect their information.…

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6

The Importance Of Technology In Security

Honestly, we are able to have a say to it. Apple should give into the FBI and should not to the government’s orders to break into their own devices. Apple is representing us as citizens, so they should help the citizens and decline assisting the FBI. Apple as a business should guarantee the safety and privacy of users information because it is confidential and should not be released without users’ permission. The government wielding too much power in that way would make way for a lot of potential abuse cases, especially when it comes down to accusing someone of being a terrorist and having their private information released just to see whether or not it is true.…

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

The Importance Of Computer Security

To investigate these cases without smartphone data is to proceed with one hand tied behind our backs. The new encryption policies of Apple and Google have made it harder to protect people from crime. We support the privacy rights of individuals. But in the absence of cooperation from Apple and Google, regulators and lawmakers in our nations must now find an appropriate balance between the marginal benefits of full-disk encryption and the need for local law enforcement to solve and prosecute crimes. The safety of our communities depends on…

Words: 910 - Pages: 4

The Importance Of Privacy In The Olmstead Case

Apple’s Tim Cook says once the key is created anyone with that knowledge can defeat the encryption. The government is asking Apple to create backdoor encryption software for only this phone. But what happens when the government needs help again, and this request become the norm. Eventually, the government technical team will figure out the software used for decryption, duplicate this software, and then have access to all Apple devices. All law enforcement agencies throughout America will receive this information.…

Words: 2128 - Pages: 9

Apple Vs The FBI Case Study

Should the government be allowed to force a company to unlock its secrets? Apple should not have to give the FBI access to their secrets because it opens a backdoor for hackers. These Apple vs the FBI cases are subjective realities because what we believe in alters our perception of the nature of things. The FBI says that they are fighting for safety and that if we want them to protect us we have to give up some of our rights to privacy. They want to decide how much we give and to whom we are giving it to.…

Words: 2024 - Pages: 9

Apple And The FBI Case Analysis

Related Documents

The FBI And The First Amendment

The Importance Of Terrorist Attacks

The Importance Of Security And The Freedom Of Our Privacy

Apple Vs. FBI: Do You Need Privacy?

The Olmstead Case Study

Pandora's Box Of Cyberspace Case Study

The Importance Of Technology In Security

The Importance Of Computer Security

The Importance Of Privacy In The Olmstead Case

Apple Vs The FBI Case Study

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?

Discover

Company

Follow