Compare And Contrast Essay On Apple Vs Fbi

Improved Essays
Apple vs. FBI, were talking here about people’s secure privacy vs. nation’s security in terrorism. In this controversy, it’s tough making a decision because both are fighting for their reasonable decisions for overall the nation. However, Apple’s product isn’t just centered here is USA, but worldwide, to some degree this should be put into perspective to where this issue is going towards. Personally, I believe that the FBI is trying to go beyond with this case and in depth to unfold more issues than just to resolve one case from one iPhone it will affect everyone’s civil liberties. I tend to be on the side of Apple in this case. It’s going to be tough for the FBI to force Apple to give them a backdoor to people’s privacy information because if we think about it there isn’t any real …show more content…
There’s a very good chance that such a law, intended to ease the job of law enforcement, would make private citizens, businesses and the government itself far less secure.” This is where Apple stands strong to prevent from happening, the government doesn’t realize how much impact this request will cause. There is a quote that I read by Edward Snowden, “The FBI is creating a world where citizens rely on Apple to defend their rights, rather than the other way around”, it caught my attention because I believe Apple is putting on line their right intentions to act correct morally and legally in their position for our individual privacy than the FBI. If Apple grants FBI a bypassing security passcode there would be a set of dangerously example of abuse from the government in my opinion. Law enforcement have been access to data founded for lawful legal orders, but it’s completely unlikely to require big companies to enable hacking of customer devices and data, than it wouldn’t only apply to Apple but many other ones such as Facebook or

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am going to take about how apple had wanted to refuse to unlock a app phone. But the FBI says that they need to unlock the phos so that they can know of there is going to be a fucher attack. But App says they will not because they had already unlock about nine phone. But the FbI had say “that there can be a fucher russon attack”.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The FBI Takes a Bite Out of Apple Imagine someone taking your phone and invading all your personal information. Thats was the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) wanted to do to Syed Farook. Syed Farook is a gunman who killed 14 people. The FBI wanted Apple to write a new software so they could unlock Farook´s phone.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After reading the article “Apple vs. The United States Government,” I agree with Apple’s stance. The San Bernardino shooting was a very tragic event that occurred last December and I do understand where the FBI is coming from, but they cannot expect Apple to risk the privacy of their customers.. There are many reasons why I agree with Apple’s stance. Smartphones have become a very sufficient part of people's lives, and we depend on them for almost everything. We have put forth our trust in these phones, by relying on them to keep all of our private information.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All Writs Act Case Study

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even though the FBI has gotten data off of the cell phone, Apple will increase the encryption and implement new security features to prevent the FBI from accessing data on any iPhone. Apple has said multiple times that it cares greatly for the customers security, and some speculate that Apple may even make their operating system encrypted, meaning no-one, even Apple, could have gained access to the information on the iPhone. “Apple has made great efforts to remove from the equation by making it impossible for them to decrypt customer data even if requests were made” (Panzarino). Since Apple has done this in the past, there is great reasoning that Apple may do this again in the future.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument made by David Morris in FBI Will Help Local Police Unlock iPhones is that now that the FBI has the ability to crack into the data stored on iPhones, the agency will utilize this capability in many situations, including local law enforcement cases and federal counter-terrorism cases. More specifically, Morris argues that there will be an increased number of iPhones that are broken into in order to investigate crimes. He writes, “The agency has since unlocked other phones, and, CBS reports, now ‘owns the proprietary rights’ to its unlocking method.” In this passage, Morris suggests that this technique will become a common tactic in law enforcement, and Apple, while improving the security of their products, has to take the government’s…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Apple Vs FBI

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bryce Hickle Prof. Whitaker Rhetoric 14 March 2017 Apple v. FBI: Apple should have complied Syed Farook is one of the terrorists involved in the massacre that took place in San Bernardino in 2015 which resulted in the murder of fourteen people. Apple v. FBI was a legal dispute involving whether or not Apple should comply with a warrant demanding them to install a back door program into this dead terrorist’s cellphone. People who defended Apple’s position had made claims stating that it was legal for Apple to choose not to comply and that making a back door program would be either not possible, dangerous, or both. However, these statements are not true. Not only was it possible for Apple to comply with the FBI’s demands without endangering…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This means that even our most private and personal phone calls, texts, and emails are subject to review by government officials. There should be more limits placed on how much the NSA can actually access and if they come across a person of interest or anything they deem suspicious, they should have to obtain a warrant so the person is aware they are going through their personal things. Otherwise, the government is taking away the right that has…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Killer's Phones

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The government is attempting to find information on a killer's phone according to the New York Times article In Nods to Law Enforcement in Apple Case, by Julian Sanchez. President Obama tries to end the straddle for privacy to divide. President Obama is trying to convince Apple to get into hacking a terrorist phone named Sayed Rizwan Farook, who resides in San Bernardino, California. The NY Post "Can an 18th Century Law Force Apple into Hacking Killer's Phone?" by Shear D. Michael…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple and the FBI are in a dispute over whether or not Apple should unlock one of the San Bernardino shooters phones in order to obtain personal records regarding potential terrorist activity. Apple believes they should not have to disclose this information and unlock the phone because it violates their “terms and agreements”. However, the FBI thinks Apple should unlock the phone because it will let them retain vital and personal information about the shooters. According to CNN writer Mike Rodgers, “The FBI was unable to access the encrypted smartphone to map the terrorist's connections to ISIS…” The FBI asked apple for help but they refused.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The FBI has used systems, softwares, and machines invade your privacy. When one of these is obsolete, they continue to violate your privacy by moving on to a more updated software system that allows them see more and more of what you are doing. The way the FBI and the government invade our privacy is just like in 1984 there wasn't really a sense of privacy in 1984 because someone was always watching or listening and soon the government is going to make the public feel like that. Ordinarily no one should want to be willing to give up their personal privacy for the greater good of society.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A current court case is Doe v. Holder. This case challenges the constitutionality of someone authorizing the FBI to look at everyone’s records in secret without judicial supervision, including internet service providers and phone companies. The Patriot Act permitted the FBI to send national security letters to phone and internet companies along with libraries, banks, and many other businesses asking for the customer’s private information. On September 28, 2004, Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York took down the national security letter statute. Marrero said that the FBI’s application required a “compulsory secret, and was not a reviewable product of the information” because it violated the fourth…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 8 – Local vs. National Authority In Chapter 8 of Thirteen American Arguments, Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority. (a) List five issues that Fineman deals with directly in the book and briefly describe how each of those issues create tension between local and national authority. Hurricane Katrina revealed a fault in American politics. Although they had predicted the dangers, neither the federal government nor the state government was in command.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (Jayakumar, Tahora, 2016) In Apple attitude, the protection and privacy of Apple’s customers and partners estimated at least 1 billion devices (Statt, 2016) dictate their refusal based on the amount of the good for the largest amount of people. Similarly, rights of the users to choose privacy and the integrity of Apple to provide secure and encrypted products to its customers. Moreover, Apple competitive advantages, costs, and level of effort to build a backdoor to the iPhone could have future negative consequences on consumers’ expectations, sentiments, and trust. (Jayakumar, Tahora,…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays