In the past, the arguments involved have always been central focused upon immoral and religious views of pornography. In society today discussing the regulations of the sexually explicit material, would involve understanding the principles of legislating against such imagery. Ideas of rating pornography on a harm ratio could have implications when legislating against. Not to mention the practical costs and dangers of censorship, whether or not society believes that pornography does cause some harm to others, the risks involved in censoring it are too great. They point to the difficulties involved in formulating a legal definition of pornography, resulting in a “Pornography is not good for you, thus we can restrict your access” (MacKinnon) attitude of the Internet Service Providers. Censoring pornography may place society on a dangerous "slippery slope" to further censorship of other material including valuable literary, artistic and political
In the past, the arguments involved have always been central focused upon immoral and religious views of pornography. In society today discussing the regulations of the sexually explicit material, would involve understanding the principles of legislating against such imagery. Ideas of rating pornography on a harm ratio could have implications when legislating against. Not to mention the practical costs and dangers of censorship, whether or not society believes that pornography does cause some harm to others, the risks involved in censoring it are too great. They point to the difficulties involved in formulating a legal definition of pornography, resulting in a “Pornography is not good for you, thus we can restrict your access” (MacKinnon) attitude of the Internet Service Providers. Censoring pornography may place society on a dangerous "slippery slope" to further censorship of other material including valuable literary, artistic and political