The Importance Of Pipeline To Canada's Environment

Improved Essays
A pipeline is like if a vein of your body was carrying illness through you. The bad cell will just multiply and multiply until you get sick, and even when you are sick it gets worse. That is what this pipeline will do to Canada's environment. The government should not approve the building of the pipeline for many important reasons. Clearcutting forests will destroy Canada's naturally beautiful landscape. Oil companies will begin producing more and more emissions the more capable they are of selling and moving their oil, and global warming can increase to an all time high if there are less trees to produce clean air and more oil being produced to pollute the air. Do we really want to do this to our environment?

Forests are plentiful in Canada,
…show more content…
This will affect the environment again in a tragic way. The air will become polluted not only because co2 is being produced, but that with all the trees they cut down, their will be less natural co2 absorbers to clean the air of impurities (trees). Water will become polluted from runoff that comes from the production of oil, the more runoff that is made the more aquatic ecosystems will continue to suffer. Fish like salmon will no longer be able to lay their eggs in streams because the water will become too polluted to swim up. Birds will show up on the shores of Canada's beaches covered in oil and tars that were just floating in pockets on top of the water. The land may also worsen as without trees natural disasters become more common. Without the proper wildlife to help it keep a healthy nutrient cycle going, the soil will go dry. Organisms that live in it and also scrub the world of its co2 will cease to …show more content…
Ice caps will begin to melt faster, because of only one pipeline. If they do, animals like penguins and polar bears are hurt by icebergs breaking and melting away. They will not have habitats anymore. As the climate rises, animals will not be able to keep up with the changing temperatures. Even the most resilient animals will have trouble adapting to the heat. Finally, land will become desolate. The hotter the earth gets the more places will dry up and water will become sparse in more places as time goes by. Everyone on earth needs water to live. Is this pipeline really worth it in the end?

The government should not approve of this pipeline, Clear cutting forests is a dangerous thing to do. It will ruin environments and ecosystems not only where the trees are but further through the forest. The more oil that companies can move, the more that they will produce. The pipeline will also cause global warming rates to rise significantly.
People may say that we require the jobs that a pipeline will build, but do they believe jobs are worth the lives of the organisms that die in the process?

-Emma French

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Woodfibre LNG Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Woodfibre LNG is planning to build a liquified natural gas (LNG) facility seven kilometres south-west of Squamish. The facility will be a link to the tankers that will bring the LNG to the rest of the world to meet rising energy demand. With the building of this facility there will be a new liquid natural gas pipeline from Greater Vancouver. LNG occurs when natural gas is cooled to -160C° and condensates from a gaseous state to a liquid state. Natural gas is a naturally occurring hydrocarbon consisting primarily of methane, but it also contains small amounts of ethane, propane, butane and pentanes which are useless to this specific industry.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline Controversy Introduction The Dakota Access Pipeline, or DAPL, is a proposed pipeline that would run one-thousand two-hundred miles from North Dakota to Illinois and carry more than four-hundred and seventy thousand barrels of crude oil. Ninety-nine percent of the land the pipeline covers is private land and does not need federal approval for construction. The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed the remaining one percent and concluded construction would have no serious impact on the environment. They decided to build the pipeline slightly north of the Standing Rock Reservation, directly through the tribe’s burial grounds, without their approval. The tribe believes that the pipeline would ruin the environment and their drinking water, despite the Corps’ claims.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The media has capitalized on the attention that these protestors have gained by camping out and having religious ceremonies dedicated to preserving their water supply. While the pipeline may appear negatively throughout news sources and social media, the construction and management of DAPL has boosted the economy and provided thousands of jobs. Also, this project is continuing the United States initiative of becoming energy-independent. Reducing oil imports from foreign countries will boost national security…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Americans have come together in support of the Tribe asking for a fair, balanced and lawful pipeline process. The environmental impact statement was wrongfully terminated. This pipeline was unfairly rerouted across our treaty lands. The Trump administration — yet again — is poised to set a precedent that defies the law and the will of Americans and our allies around the…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It will also cross several major rivers in the United States. Possibly most importantly it will cross the Ogallala Aquifer, a major water source of the United States(Friends Of Earth). Also stated by The Friends of the Earth organization, “The Keystone XL Pipeline will carry 830,000 barrels of dirty Tar Sands Oil into the United States daily, and result in climate damaging emissions equal to adding more than 5.6 million new cars to U.S roads.” This pipeline would be created by the TransCanada Corporation and would go from Hardisty, Alta to Steele City, Nebraska(Transcanada). It will cross many areas of farmland and some extremely fragile ecosystems, which creates an even larger problem because pipeline spills happen often.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent coalition of these various groups derives from a singular plan of preventing the pipeline from being implemented, in order to prevent oil from Alberta reaching an international market. Without the oil being utilised in a more efficient manner, the American oil companies are able to monopolize the international market and retain all revenue streams for themselves. Furthermore, with Canadian oil being landlocked we are forced to sell it to the United States for a discounted rate as result, which is exactly what the American Oil companies want, “They’d like to keep Canadian oil in the ground and, alternatively, they want to keep Canadian oil landlocked. Because we can’t reach overseas markets, our landlocked oil is sold at a huge discount to customers in the U.S.” - Suzanne Anton, the Minister of Justice (British Columbia). The revenue that Canada is expected to receive from the Kinder Morgan project would compete with the American Oil Companies, and take away from them.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Because the Tar Sands oil is so thick and chemically different than conventional unrefined oil, it must be upgraded to a form that is more transportable and useable as a base for synthetic oil. (Upgrading is so energy intensive that it adds one to two hundred pounds of CO2 to the atmosphere for every barrel of bitumen upgraded. Compared to refining conventional oil, upgrading tar sands (removing impurities and adding hydrogen) produces two to three times more sulfur dioxide (which causes rain), volatile organic compounds (producers of ozone), and particulate matter (a cause of heart and lung disease, Avery, pg 185). Environmentalists, as well as everyday citizens, have expressed concerns that these pollutants will add to global warming and the heating of our planet. In a time when the world is trying to cut down on carbon emissions to fight global warming, the processing of the Tar Sands oil produces up to 20 percent higher emissions than the processing of conventional oil.…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline is in the process of being built to connect the oil rich areas of North Dakota to Illinois. The hope of completing the pipeline, would make moving crude oil to the refineries in the Gulf Coast or East Coast areas a lot easier. President Obama, in November of 2015, put a stop to the pipeline being built because of the controversy that it caused (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). By putting an end to the controversy about the construction of the pipeline, it put a stop to the disagreements, and protesting over the project that went on throughout most of Obama’s presidency (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). On the 24th of January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order to finish the Dakota Pipeline; however, the pipeline would need to be in agreement with the law before it can be completed (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017).…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tragedy of the Commons: The Lorax meets the Dakota Access Pipeline The tragedy of the commons is an economic problem popularized by Garrett Hardin in the late 1960s. This widely accepted theory states that “every individual tries to reap the greatest benefit from a given resource. As the demand for the resource overwhelms the supply, every individual who consumes an additional unit directly harms others who can no longer enjoy the benefits.” (Investopedia)…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As much as I enjoyed reading anatomy books, I broadened my horizons and expanded my interests in areas such as political science, crime cases, debates, issues in the economy- you name it, and I read it. These were only a few of the many subjects that I devoured to satisfy my hunger for information and fill my personal library of knowledge. Through research, I opened my mind to current events, and figuratively brought me to places in the world I have never traveled. Recently, the topic “Should we extend the Keystone XL Pipeline to transport more crude oil from Canada into America?” came to mind and mind spun with ideas about the Canadian ecosystem, the shoreline, and the increase in jobs if we extend the Pipeline; concluding that.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many environmentalists empirically view this as a reason to oppose the pipeline, as well as create trust issues with the company. Overall, for an environmentalist, the Keystone Pipeline, regardless of jobs and profit, is a terrible…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Obama’s Hypocrisy President Barack Hussein Obama is the forty fourth president of the United States elected in 2008 and he is the first president, under the constitution, of African descent. He worked his way up from the Illinois State Senate to the US Senate and was officially sworn in as president on January 20, 2009. Given his background in politics, logically, people assumed that he was a responsible, trustworthy candidate for president; however, his actions prove otherwise. His past work does not stand for his mental ability to run and decide for a country. Instead of his idea of “hope” and “change”, his presidency has brought the United States to the brink of ruin.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics