Tragedy Of The Commons: The Lorax Meets The Dakota Access Pipeline

Improved Essays
Tragedy of the Commons: The Lorax meets the Dakota Access Pipeline

The tragedy of the commons is an economic problem popularized by Garrett Hardin in the late 1960s. This widely accepted theory states that “every individual tries to reap the greatest benefit from a given resource. As the demand for the resource overwhelms the supply, every individual who consumes an additional unit directly harms others who can no longer enjoy the benefits.” (Investopedia) This theme of greed is present throughout many modern day stories, such as Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax, a children’s book highlighting the dangers humans pose to the environment, as well real life scenarios, such as the Dakota Access Pipeline, a controversial underground oil-bearing pipeline
…show more content…
These two examples, though different in nature, relate to Hardin’s theory of the tragedy of commons by promoting themes of self-interest, limited resources, and sacrifice.

In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garrett Hardin, humans putting their own self-interest before the good of their community is referenced multiple times. On page 2, Hardin describes the growing problem with overpopulation, discussing how, in his mind, it would seem that parents who have more children would be less capable of giving their children the proper care that a parent with fewer children could. Hardin believes that this would cause them to leave fewer descendants in the long run, however, he then goes on to discuss that since “our society is deeply committed to the ‘welfare state’,” this can never be the case. The welfare state he describes here is the help one may receive from either the government or other human beings if they cannot raise their children themselves. He relates this example to the tragedy of the commons and self interest by insinuating that humans have reached ‘overpopulation’ due to people breeding freely, without thinking of the negative effects it could have on the economy or the world. Though this would not be a problem if it were only a few families
…show more content…
If you look at the original tragedy of the commons example of grazing cows, you understand that if every farmer tries to maximize their profits by buying another cow and, thus, overgrazing the land, eventually there will be no more grass for the cows to graze at all. In The Lorax, the Once-ler, who has profited tremendously off of selling items made of Truffula, comes face to face with a harsh reality when he looks outside and realizes that he has cut down the last standing Truffula tree. Prior to this realization, the Once-ler was too self-absorbed and greedy to pay attention to the limited supply of trees in which he was killing at such a remarkable pace. He did not care that he had forced the Brown Bar-ba-loots, the Swomee-Swans, and the Humming-Fish out of their homes. After the Once-ler realizes there is a limited supply, and that his actions affect more than just him, it is too late for him to do anything to fix it. The Dakota Access Pipeline does not necessarily have a ‘finite amount of resources’ to be dealt with, rather it focuses on the possibility of harming or ruining a large resource that would have a large impact on many people, particularly the Standing Rock Sioux. According to Time Magazine, “The pipeline would travel underneath the Missouri River, the primary drinking water source for the Standing Rock Sioux, a tribe of around 10,000 with

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Donald Worster Tragedy

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ENVCUL Module 9 Discussion Assignment Question #6 When Donald Worster refers to the “tragedy of the laissez faire commons,” he is talking about the rapacious depletion of a resource that isn’t technically under ownership and the consequences that result from the exhaustion of said resource. The example Worster uses is the U.S.’s western ranching industry during the late 19th century, which boomed for a brief period but then quickly collapsed. Its demise was due to ranchers, not caring about public land they weren’t responsible for, overgrazing their cattle herds. This overgrazing had a domino effect, decimating the vegetation needed for the livestock to survive, which led to the death of much of the livestock.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By taking legal action and looking for support from the many #NoDAPL activists that have fought for months at the spirit camps in North Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux hopes to make a difference against this controversial pipeline. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency behind the plan for the Dakota Access Pipeline, “probably thought their path forward was clear”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline is still an ongoing battle. The determined Standing Rock Sioux tribe and their many supporters are still protesting at full force. However the Deputy secretary of the Army will grant the permit to complete the pipeline. The Army working on the pipeline planned on granting a 30-year easement but it was hailed by Congressional Republicans and decried by Standing Rock Sioux tribe. In recent documents filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said Army officials said they was terminating a plan to prepare an environmental - impact statement.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    thesis: The struggle over the Dakota Access Pipeline emphasizes a longstanding history of colonialism and demonstrates threats to environmental justice. Struggles to overcome colonialism and exploitation characterize the history of many indigenous populations, such as the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. In his essay, Kyle Powys Whyte analyzes the impacts of colonialism in relation to the Dakota Access Pipeline controversy and defines colonialism as “a “complex social process in which at least one society seeks to move permanently onto the terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial places lived in by one or more other societies who already derive economic vitality, cultural flourishing, and political self-determination from the relationships they have established…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Green Belt Movement

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gidwani observes an inherent incompatibility in capitalism and commons. While capitalism seeks to maximize individual gains, commons share a different goal of bettering the community. So, whenever capitalism and commons are at odds, a capitalist society seek to subdue and eradicate the obstacle impeding its capitalistic; however, Wangari Maathai’s environmentalist campaign against the Kenyan government demonstrates that commons can, in fact, be incorporated into capitalism. The contradiction arises in that Gidwani oversimplifies the issue of wastelands into purely economics and fails to see its sociopolitical and cultural roots. Whenever the cost of opposing something exceeds the benefits, capitalism redraws the lines of what is and what is not waste.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sea Otters Pros And Cons

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Tragedy of the Commons" is a term used to describe what happens to common resources as a result of human greed. It was first coined in an article in Science in 1968 by Garrett Hardin. The commons dilemma was seen long before Hardin, but he brought widespread attention to it and described it in a common-sense fashion that made it easily accessible.” For instance, “at its core, the Tragedy of the Commons demonstrates that, in a situation where the consequences of a course of action are shared among a collective, while the benefits are reaped by an individual or single group within the collective, people will tend to take actions that in the long term are detrimental to the group as a whole. This is a tragedy because, in seeking their own personal gain, the members of the group actually ultimately hurt themselves…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law enforcement actions have been executed in order to evacuate protestors with military vehicles, security dogs, and numerous arrests (Strickland 2016: 2). Lastly Native American people have socially constructed the pipeline’s meaning to be severely unstable for the environment and their water supply. Some of the major concerns Native Americans propose are; leakage into river ways affecting quality of water, violating federal law by not complying to provide an environmental statement, and the negligence of nation to nation consultation involving indigenous leaders (Camp of the Sacred Stone 2016). Although all three groups have constructed their own interpretation of the Dakota Access Pipeline, Energy Transfer Partners have formed an alliance with law enforcers…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline has received a lot of attention in the media for the past several months and once again constitute a polemic topic in our nation. It is hard for the U.S. government to understand the value and to even know which places are sacred for Native Americans. However, I believe by now U.S government should better understand their religion and beliefs. I mean they acknowledge that it’s a consistent problem they face, As legal scholar Stephen Pevar tells us, in the article named“Native American Relgiion and Dakota Access Pipeline Crisis: “There is no federal statute that expressly protects Indian sacred sites…. in fact, the federal government knowingly desecrates sites.”…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dakota Pipeline

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Dakota Access pipeline is a pipeline that is being built to transfer crude oil fro North Dakota to Illinois. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, whose reservation is directly affected by the pipeline in North and South Dakota, has been opposed to it since 2014, when they learned about the plans. The pipeline is designed to go under the Missouri River, which is the primary source of drinking water for the Sioux, who argue that not only does this put their water in danger and further contribute to man-inflicted climate change, but is also in sacred burial ground. There have been protests and legal actions taken to slow and stop the construction of the pipeline. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. defends similar non-violent campaigns and protests.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article declares that the initial route was dangerously close neighboring homes and in an effort to protect nearby wells that supply drinking water, the government changed the pipeline’s path. Furthermore, the article states that the new route was, for the most part, chosen for it’s already existing infrastructure. While the story highlights actual problems presented in the first routing draft and logical reasoning for the second, the real issue mentioned is the lack of consultation and consideration for the native community on the part of the government. The Sioux tribe did not receive the same caution and review for the effects of this pipeline as another group did. In “Standing Rock and the Erosion of Tribal Rights”, Penn-Roco writes, “Tribes are sovereign nations.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (7) Protestors and the Standing Rock Sioux assert that even a small spill could damage the tribe’s life-giving water supply. Standing Rock Sioux also claim that building the pipeline would require the desecration of sacred Indian burial grounds which the Sioux equate to genocide and the erasure of their archival footprint. Also, Sioux Indian leaders cite that the federal…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As population numbers of every country is different, needed resources are also unequal. In our crowded world, there are many people who are living good lives while two thirds of the population are living a poor life. Through Lifeboat Ethics: the Case against Helping the Poor written by Garrett Hardin (1974) it explains how there are many dangers of overpopulation through the world. Hardin goes into detail about how overpopulation and having different population’s causes for an unequal resource need. Hardin’s article has many strengths and weakness to prove his point that there are many things wrong with overpopulation and what the world is trying to do to deal with these issues.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Smith’s The Production of Nature from Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (1987) draws on the work of Karl Marx to explore how the structure of capitalism has affected society’s relationship with the natural world as factor of production. Smith argues that our conceptions about nature as being separate from society are what enable us to exploit it. In order to explain this concept Smith divides nature into first nature and second nature. First nature, being the pristine ideal that many identify as the natural world, and second nature, that which is the product of human labor and often identified as an object of society, even though its origins are from the earth. Our inability to protect natural areas that are…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Selfishness is exposed by Durning’s “Asking How Much Is Enough” In the short essay “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Garrett Hardin argues that the planet faces the problem of overpopulation. He suggest nations should stop helping the poor before the overpopulation kills everyone. He advises the wealthy to protect their resources and leave those who cannot to fend for themselves.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays