Keystone Pipeline Research Paper

Superior Essays
Keystone XL: A Pipeline Fueling Debate The Keystone Pipeline XL, a large pipeline that has been proposed to transport oil from the Canada to the United States, has led to controversy recently. Why is there so much debate, you may ask, when it has, “the support of an increasing number of Democrats, as well as the vast majority of Republicans in Congress” (Steinhauer, 2012)? There are many disputes between political parties and groups in the U.S., but what is special about the Keystone Pipeline is that the support is not one sided. While a political party may share similar interests, core belief groups lie within these parties that separate them even more. To understand this and why there is not one hundred percent of either party approving, …show more content…
He agreed with classical liberalism and their view on limited government involvement. He also shared the belief that economic inequalities are inevitable by stating, “those who attempt to level, never equalize”(Burke, 1982, P. 55). The government should not try to make society equal, because it can never fully be equal. Burke (1963) broke away from classical liberalism by stressing the importance of family units, values, and traditions explaining that, “the individual is foolish…when they act without deliberation; but the species is wise…a species it always acts right”(P. 540). Burke believed that there is never a bad decision (according to the actions and mind of people), because people can just reason through it. According to Burke that is why we need traditional values, from churches and families, that are passed down from one generation to the next as a standard to compare your decisions too. For example, the Ten Commandments states that stealing is wrong. People look to this to decide if their decision to steal is right/wrong. Burke also stresses that traditional morality is more important than individual liberty, so that no one has the freedom to violate these morals. Traditional conservatives have sent mixed signals when it comes to the environment and the Keystone XL. Although traditional conservatives share a substantial chunk of belief with …show more content…
Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014). Many environmentalists empirically view this as a reason to oppose the pipeline, as well as create trust issues with the company. Overall, for an environmentalist, the Keystone Pipeline, regardless of jobs and profit, is a terrible

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Also in the article Should the United States Authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to Import Tar Sand Oil from Canada, it talks about how, "Indigenous peoples (known as First Nations) in Canada are taking the lead to stop the largest industrial project on Mother Earth: the Tar Sands Gig project. Northern Alberta is ground zero with over 20 corporations operating in the tar sands sacrifice zone, with expanded developments being planned. The cultural heritage, land, ecosystems and human health of First Nation communities... are being sacrificed for oil money in what has been termed a 'slow industrial genocide'. Infrastructure projects linked to the tar sands expansion such as... the Keystone XL pipeline, threaten First Nation communities in British…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline Controversy Introduction The Dakota Access Pipeline, or DAPL, is a proposed pipeline that would run one-thousand two-hundred miles from North Dakota to Illinois and carry more than four-hundred and seventy thousand barrels of crude oil. Ninety-nine percent of the land the pipeline covers is private land and does not need federal approval for construction. The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed the remaining one percent and concluded construction would have no serious impact on the environment. They decided to build the pipeline slightly north of the Standing Rock Reservation, directly through the tribe’s burial grounds, without their approval. The tribe believes that the pipeline would ruin the environment and their drinking water, despite the Corps’ claims.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The media has capitalized on the attention that these protestors have gained by camping out and having religious ceremonies dedicated to preserving their water supply. While the pipeline may appear negatively throughout news sources and social media, the construction and management of DAPL has boosted the economy and provided thousands of jobs. Also, this project is continuing the United States initiative of becoming energy-independent. Reducing oil imports from foreign countries will boost national security…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Keystone Pipeline and the proposed Pipeline XL would be an accomplice to the destruction of our planet. (“.. by facilitating tar sands oil production the proposed pipeline will result in carbon emissions equivalent to 46 new coal…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline is in the process of being built to connect the oil rich areas of North Dakota to Illinois. The hope of completing the pipeline, would make moving crude oil to the refineries in the Gulf Coast or East Coast areas a lot easier. President Obama, in November of 2015, put a stop to the pipeline being built because of the controversy that it caused (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). By putting an end to the controversy about the construction of the pipeline, it put a stop to the disagreements, and protesting over the project that went on throughout most of Obama’s presidency (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). On the 24th of January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order to finish the Dakota Pipeline; however, the pipeline would need to be in agreement with the law before it can be completed (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017).…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dakota access pipeline is an affliction to everyone who has a sense of compassion and understanding, especially to indigenous people who are being taxed with decisions and demands from careless people who conceal their true intentions with false facts and reasonings,when all they care about is the green in promising. Recently the $3.8 billion project has become one of America's most followed up protest, for it keeps gaining many people's attention with every protest and support. There are hundreds of people every day at the construction site, and protests are held in others states like Chicago, New York, and Washington. Native Americans and their supporters have been protesting since July 2014, when they first learned about the protest, and since then their cries for help have had minimum effect on the process of the pipeline. Everyone will have a time in their life when they have to be as tenacious as they can be to stand up for their rights and beliefs.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They have a lot of concerns about the environmental impacts the pipeline could cause. They argue that fossil fuels should be kept in the ground and that man-made climate change would be a result of the pipelines (Worland). They think the pipeline should not be built, because there are many environmental problems associated with it. They argue that “the pipeline would perpetuate fossil fuel production” (BBC). I am interested in the North Dakota pipeline because I believe that the Native Americans are being treated unfairly.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Obama’s Hypocrisy President Barack Hussein Obama is the forty fourth president of the United States elected in 2008 and he is the first president, under the constitution, of African descent. He worked his way up from the Illinois State Senate to the US Senate and was officially sworn in as president on January 20, 2009. Given his background in politics, logically, people assumed that he was a responsible, trustworthy candidate for president; however, his actions prove otherwise. His past work does not stand for his mental ability to run and decide for a country. Instead of his idea of “hope” and “change”, his presidency has brought the United States to the brink of ruin.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened doors to the insecurities of the Canada- U.S. relationship as well as questioned the rhetoric of the energy policy of the United States (Kalen 5). Many people were torn as to whether the risk of the pipeline would outweigh its potential benefits. There were concerns of the environment as well as the effect on gas prices (Terry 61-62). The advocates of this pipeline suggested it would secure borders as well as benefit the economy immensely (Slade 28). Although the pipeline would represent just a small portion of the 2.6 million miles of oil pipelines that currently exist, many have aggressively debated this topic for an extensive amount of time (“Keystone” 1).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is the proposed last segment of the greater Keystone Pipeline project owned by TransCanada which would run from Hardisty, Alberta (in Canada) to Steele City, Nebraska. The proposed pipeline would carry oil sands from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast (Cama and Wilson 14).This pipeline would utilize a bitumen-harvesting process which is more environmentally damaging and less efficient than the tradition oil drilling process. Additionally, the pipeline has been controversial due to the environmental hazards tin its operation (Issitt). One of the major groups of protestors to the Keystone Pipeline are Native American Tribes including the Northern Arapaho Tribe, Yankton Sioux Tribe, and Blackfeet tribe. Their feelings…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pipeline protection: an enduring safety-focused commitment for Maccaferri Mexico, in a world craving for energy Pipeline infrastructures can be successfully and safely protected by using Maccaferri’s MacNet™ products In a world of growing environmental dangers, triggered by climate change, and rising security issues in relation to potential terrorist threats, the protection of oil and gas infrastructures like pipelines has now become a top priority in the agenda of governments and the energy industry worldwide. When a pipeline is damaged, whether it has been deliberately sabotaged under a terrorist attack, like it’s been often occurring in the Middle East in recent times, affected by seismic or land movements, or ruptured during excavation…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays