10th Amendment Federalism

Superior Essays
Federalism, the division of government into two sovereign powers (the national and state governments), is based in the Constitution and has been affirmed by the Supreme Court’s interpretations as to what the Constitution requires. While the 10th Amendment is the only portion of the Constitution that expressly addresses the division of authoritative rights, many other sections of the Constitution affirm the importance of federalism and justify rules enacted in its protection.
Some federalism-related rules have clear basis in the 10th Amendment, which says powers not delegated to the US are reserved for the states. The anti-commandeering doctrine, which prohibits the federal government from compelling states to govern or regulate in a particular way, is almost explicitly derived from this Amendment; indeed, NY v. U.S., one of the definitive cases establishing anti-commandeering, specifically states that allowing federal compulsion of state action would be “counter to federalism, a core of which is enshrined in the tenth amendment.” However, other federalism-related requirements of the Constitution seem to be based on principles established in sections other than the 10th Amendment. The limitation of Congress’ commerce power is one such requirement. While the Supreme Court spent the early part of the 20th century hacking away at federalism by expanding the commerce power in cases like Jones & Laughlin and Wickard, the court later decided in Lopez to place some restraint on Congress’ commerce clause authority. Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in Lopez stated that allowing the commerce power to extend to gun possession near schools would imply that any activity could have a substantial effect on commerce and thus be regulated.
…show more content…
Kennedy said this should be disallowed because it runs counter to the idea that the federal government has only limited powers. That idea of limited federal power, while stated in the 10th amendment, was established by the enumerated powers of Article 1, Section 8, especially in the necessary and proper clause. By stating that Congress may enact laws vested in it by the Constitution, the clause implies that there exist other powers not constitutionally vested, which Congress does not have. This idea of division of power established in Article is the basis for the eventual reigning-in of Congress’ previously ominous commerce power. The 11th Amendment has also been interpreted by the Supreme Court to firmly establish that the Constitution’s framers intended some degree federalist review. The 11th Amendment says the Federal Judicial power does not extend to suits where a state is a party. In Seminole Tribe, the court decided Congress’ power under section five of the 14th Amendment did not allow it to abrogate states’ rights to sovereign immunity under the 11th Amendment. In that opinion, the court said it understands “the Eleventh Amendment to stand not so much for what it says, but for the presupposition which it confirms…first that each state is a sovereign entity in our federal system; and second, that ‘[i]t is inherent in the nature of sovereignty not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent.’” (Quoting Hans v. Louisiana). Here, the court has repeatedly stated that the need to protect states as individual sovereign entities is a core constitutional requirement, and its reasoning comes from outside the 10th Amendment. Other portions of the …show more content…
These safeguards include the fact that federal lawmakers are elected by state constituents (after the 17th Amendment), and therefore the lawmakers will be motivated by a desire to meet the needs of those who elected them and may elect them again. This relationship ensures lawmakers are sensitive to the rights of the states and eager to protect those rights from federal intervention. This theory was essentially the basis for the Court’s ruling in Garcia. There, the Court overturned the ruling in National League of Cities, in which it had previously said Congress should be limited in its power to regulate state employment relations because of the Constitution’s recognition of state sovereignty. Garcia essentially said there is no implied limitation on federal commerce power, but instead the framers sought to protect federalism through governmental structure: things like the Electoral College and equal representation in the Senate naturally protect state interests from central control. One who buys this theory acknowledges that federalism-related rules are derived not only from the 10th Amendment, but the structure of the entire

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    What is federalism? Federalism “is a unique relationship between all levels of government that gives each some degree of independence from each other but definitely binds them together through the United States Constitution.” (pg. 69) 2.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to the ratification of the US constitution power focused on dual sovereignty, between state and national government. On page 44 of Paul Peterson’s “From the Price of Federalism”, he further explains that state legislatures could nullify federal laws; while congress was given the power to raise an army and wage war, states could also maintain their own militia. The states LOST their sovereignty. Through modern federalism “each level of government had its own independently elected political leaders and its own separate taxing and spending capacity.”…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the constitution helps guard against tyranny by giving neither the state or central government enough power to tyrannize. According to Doc. A, “James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788”, “power...is first divided between two distinct governments” Also in the Venn diagram on Doc A neither the state or local government possesses all the power. They either have to share a power or only one side gets that certain power. This helps guard against tyranny because it is preventing the central or local government from holding all power.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Dbq

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a result, the “two distinct govts” are the delegated powers given to the US govt and the reserved powers reserved to the states. Federalism protects against…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which goes to show that the state has a say in what happens within it while still letting the government decide on big decisions. Overall, this states that each branch has some control over the other, but not full…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The 10th Amendment sets forth one of our most cherished rights. When states and local communities take the lead on policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers are much more accountable to the people” (The 10th Amendment, 2014, para 1). “The greatest virtue of the 10th Amendment is that it embodies the wisdom of checks and balances” (The 10th Amendment, 2014, para 3) , even in education. “The state of education in our country demonstrates the 10th Amendment’s strengths and weaknesses. The 10th Amendment has ensured that education is funded primarily at the state and local levels, with certain inequities for our children” (The 10th Amendment, 2014, para 4).…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 10th Amendment says that the powers not directly granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution or by the States, are reserved to the States and or to the people. This amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not provide an accurate measure of which powers belong to the national government and those which belong to the state government and the people. Due to the lack of specific distinction in the powers, the Tenth Amendment can become very open to interpretation regarding the rights and authority that the state and the national government have over certain issues. To aid in determining the difference in powers, proposed modifications to the Tenth Amendment, which would spell out specific rights of the state government, will be presented and explained.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tenth Amendment guarantees that all forces not appointed to the national government are held to the states or to the general population. The Supreme Court has tried to secure this alteration lately by limiting Congress' energy. For instance, when looking to restrain the force of states, Congress must give an unambiguous explanation of its expectation to overrule state expert. the Tenth Amendment was proposed to affirm the comprehension of the general population at the time the Constitution was embraced, that forces not allowed to the United States were saved to the States or to the general population. It added nothing to the instrument as initially sanctioned.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2. Reinforcing the 10th Amendment I. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. II. Congress shall pass no law, nor the United States issue any regulation that uses either penalty or reward to coerce or induce the states to make law, or the people to take or avoid action, except for such…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question all Americans are asked at some point in time is the question of the states’ rights vs the control of the federal government. Many people believe that the states’ should have more control than the federal government because they don’t like the rules or laws that the federal government place on the American people. They use excuses like, the states created the federal government not the other way around, or that some states have different values than others. Well I personally believe that the federal government should have the power to declare a law without states that don’t benefit majorly from the law threatening to nullify the it.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalism

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Additionally, when the decision was handed down in the most recent immigration federalism dispute in United States v. Arizona, the Supreme Court found that “The Supremacy Clause gives Congress the power to preempt state law…Intent can be inferred from a framework of regulation ‘so pervasive...that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it’ or where a ‘federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject.’ Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U. S. 218, 230. Second, state laws are preempted when they conflict with federal law, including when they stand ‘as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.’ Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U. S. 52, 67. Pp.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays