Essay On Statutory Criminal Law

Improved Essays
Introduction
This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.
Statutory Criminal Law Defined
Statutory criminal laws are simply laws that are written or prepared by a state or federal legislative body to govern conduct, protect the safety and welfare of the public, and/or address social issues that may be health or crime related. Once a statutory criminal law is written or prepared it becomes a bill that is first introduced to the members of the legislative body, where it was formed, by the House of
…show more content…
In one case, where Congress passed a law, (Gun-Free School Zone Act), under the commerce clause, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this law to be unconstitutional, because it overstepped the powers of Congress to enact such a law based on the reasoning of the law. In other cases, where laws have been enacted on the federal level, such as laws which deal with issues of universal health care, immigration, and same sex marriage, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled or upheld these federal enacted laws as constitutional. However, some states have challenged these laws and have called into question the constitutionality and the power of the federal government to enact or impose such laws, most states feel that these laws infringe on their individual rights to address these

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The United State’s government is attempting to limit the rights of the states once again, this time while also violating the commerce clause. Now, the United States Government is trying to tell my state of Montana, among others, that we cannot create our own firearms laws and that we must follow the federal government’s. The weapons were made and sold within the state of Montana, so we should have say about what laws are placed upon these firearms. To regulate our products made in the great state of Montana, the federal government is undermining the meaning of the commerce clause. The clause has to do with interstate commerce, not intrastate; therefore, defining it as intrastate as well as interstate practically means that the 10th amendment is useless.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that Congress was violating the Twenty-first Amendment by taking away states decision for their minimun drinking age. This case brings the issue of federalism into play by questioning who has the power over law-making. Does Congress have the right to take away a states right to decide the legal drinking age? While South Dakota obviously thought that this was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court had believed otherwise. With a 7 to 2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled Congress' law constitutional.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch. President Adams spent his last hours in officer appointing Federalist judge in all positions.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court can declare state regulations unconstitutional if deem to be unreasonable on interstate commerce. Federal preemption gives congress the power to regulate an entire field even if no conflict exists between state and federal…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Tenth Amendment

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The tenth amendment was created to affirm an understanding for the citizens at the time the Constitution was created (CRS Annotated Constitution. (n.d.). It was a creation so the people of the states could have powers not given by the United States (CRS Annotated Constitution. (n.d.). The tenth amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United Sates by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people (CRS Annotated Constitution.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State courts can also decide whether or not an act of a certain state complies with that state’s constitution. Judicial review means that even after a law has been passed, it can still be deemed invalid and removed. It is even possible for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision made in a previous case and decide that the act is unconstitutional after all. For example, the decision in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education overturned the decision made in the Plessy vs. Ferguson case – that institutionalized racial segregation was…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Supremacy Clause The constitution of the United States grants certain rights to the federal government and to the state government. Both the federal and state governments can make laws. Any laws made by a state will be binding on their territory under its jurisdiction while federal laws bind all states. unless there is a state law that directly contradicts the federal law.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 10th Amendment says that the powers not directly granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution or by the States, are reserved to the States and or to the people. This amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not provide an accurate measure of which powers belong to the national government and those which belong to the state government and the people. Due to the lack of specific distinction in the powers, the Tenth Amendment can become very open to interpretation regarding the rights and authority that the state and the national government have over certain issues. To aid in determining the difference in powers, proposed modifications to the Tenth Amendment, which would spell out specific rights of the state government, will be presented and explained.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statutory Criminal Law Defined Statutory Criminal Law is a law that is ratified by a state or federal legislative body who regulates unwanted behavior, and defends the interest of the public. A bill is written to outline the issues to be addressed, and is presented in the House of Representatives or the Senate. The members of the legislature will vote for or against the bill. However, both houses must vote in order for the bill to pass. It will then be presented to the executive branch of the administration, the state which is the governor or the federal which is the president, to be considered or passed.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the biggest talked about subjects can be summed up in one question, "Can government interfere with legalizing recreational marijuana if it's a states choice?" According to the ninth amendment, " The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. " Meaning, even though there are states rights that exist, like the use of recreational marijuana, it does not mean a state's rights can be violated by interference of the federal government. Along with the tenth amendment that states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that by making some changes to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines would in the long run make our justice system better able to serve the people. I know many of you, like I believe there should be no change to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines, but have you or I for that matter really thought through what that means for people like Lee Wollard or Trina Garnett? Lee Wollard didn’t hurt the young man, he protected his daughter and family, yet is spending twenty years behind bars because he fired a warning shot into his home. Trina Garnett was an abused teenager with a mental illness that needed medical care not sent to prison.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Regulatory Law

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As of the 21st century, regulatory laws have impacted our daily activities and lives. Regulatory laws are regulations that set out certain requirements on what is legal or illegal. The Impact of Regulatory Law on American Criminal Justice- Are there too many laws? by Vincent Del Castillo provides an overview of the results of having regulatory laws. While the book talks about a variety of topics, we will mainly focus on illegal drugs, guns, the police, and also the societal consequences.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism and Gun Control Gun control in the United States has been a controversial topic for a number of years. The different ways in which one can interpret the constitution plays a big role in the controversy between whether certain gun control laws violate your civil liberties as citizens of the United States. There have been numerous court cases dealing with gun control, with some of the major including: District of Columbia Vs. Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Delegated legislation (also known as secondary legislation) have many benefits with regards to passing Laws. Due to the sheer volume of Laws that need passing in England, leaving The Houses of Parliament unable to meet with the demands, thus the allowance of a second party to pass an Act (through the parenting/enabling act), both the House of Commons and the House of Lords can continue with their ever-changing workload. Made up of two separate houses, The Houses of Parliament consist of; the House of Commons, and the House of Lords. 650 majoritarian elected individuals known as ‘Members of Parliament’ (or MPs for short), make up the House of Commons, and each MP represents a constituency, such as Conservative party member Karen Bradley who represents Leek.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays