Commercial Society In Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Superior Essays
Commercial society has played a huge part in the creation of society. It has allowed for the formation of nations, the creation of private property as well as the establishment of a prosperous society. The results of commercial society is the establishment of more individual freedom. Furthermore, the commercial way of life has qualities of free society by allowing for individuals to acquire freewill by incentivizing the pursuit of wealth. Second, the characteristics of a commercial society has pushed for competition which has led to impeccable expansion on technology. Third, commercial society has generated an overall growth in wealth. Even though there has been much progress in society the commercial way of life has led to some unintended …show more content…
Capitalism creates a system where workers become vulnerable to exploitation. This is due to capitalism focusing on making a profit as a priority. Therefore, workers usually are put into poor working condition and are payed low wages for their work. They spend their whole life working for minimum wage. Hence, workers can be compared to modern slaves of the economic system of capitalism. This can be seen in developing nations. In Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto, Marx speaks about injustice that the Bourgeois impose on the Proletarians. He clarifies that the commercial society has made the proletarian slaves towards capitalism. He describes the working class, “As privates of the industrial army they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself (Marx 5). This shines the light on the working condition of the working class. Thus, this demonstrates how the commercial society can undermine freedom in a certain way. The working class will fall into a vicious cycle of …show more content…
Therefore, Marx states that, “The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe. It must nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connexions everywhere (Marx 3). This clarifies that commercial society does not stay stagnant. It moves and expands all around the world. Therefore, the effects of commercial society are international. Hence, it undermines freedom globally not just in a certain region. Likewise, Marx states, “Modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist. Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory, are organised like soldier” (Marx 5). Marx describes the conditions of small business and who the small business is converted to a corporation. Thus, small business owners need to adapt to the market or they will go out of business. In other words, small business owners lose the liberty to pave the direction they want their business to go due to the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx talks about the effects of globalization. “In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes” (16). Here he is saying that because the bourgeois are expanding their consumption and production of new and different things, people are developing desires and wants for things they did not previously know existed. Due to this, old businesses of the native country are falling apart and being destroyed. He continues on to talk about self-sufficiency, and how countries are no longer self-sufficient because they are dependent on other places to receive products.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 3) In the first essay of On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche’s central concern is the slave revolt in morality. In this paper, I argue that Nietzsche does not think Marx an example of the slave revolt in morality as Nietzsche’s view of the slave class is different to Marx’s view of the proletarians as well as their differing suggestions in terms of imaginary revenge and physical revolution. To begin with, Nietzsche explains in the first essay that master morality is one associated with the noble who are “the mighty, the high-placed and the high-minded” (Nietzsche, 11).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In such ways, the factories and stores should be taken from the capitalist and should be taken over by the workers. Karl Marx…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, many will agree that the world revolves around commerce, as the economy has been the main focal point of many thriving nations. Globally, the most common economic system is a mixed economy, which is a combination of a command and market economy. A command economy is focused on the central government. In a command economy, the government has control over the marketplace, and decides what is produced and sold. A market economy focuses on private business, and it allows for free trade and competition.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bourgeoisie Vs Marxism

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto, Marx describes how Capitalism has increasing dominance of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie classes, the two major contending classes. He states that old classes, such as the small tradespeople, shopkeepers, retired tradesmen, handicraftsmen, and peasants all gradually are pushed into becoming the proletariat. This is mostly because their small wealth cannot serve for the scale on which the other bigger businesses have. This smaller wealth population lags behind the competition with the large capitalists because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production. In other words they cannot adapt to the fast pace of innovation.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural Vs Dystopian

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The theory of profit has changed many times over the course of time, from Smith to Keynes, profit has been redefined and debated over creating a divide in thought. Is profit natural or not? According to Marx and Smith, two very renowned political economists, profit is not natural, that profit is a result of exploitation of the labor force resulting in a greater total revenue than total cost(definition of profit). On the other hand, Keynes believes that profit is natural, the product of a capitalistic society with business cycles where wages are regulated by the market and in certain cases permitting firms to turn a profit. Really though, based on classical thinkers, profit is unnatural, the product of class discrimination between the Bourgeoisie…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Serfs were quite skilled in production and services, and the upper classes heavily relied on their labour to sustain society. To reiterate, the upper classes saw themselves fit to rule over lower classes based on their ability to make necessary decisions. (They were not as skilled at the peasant class.) This ideology obstructed the serfs’ ability to gain any type of sociopolitical power or wealth, which tethered them to the land of their overseers and heavily restricted their freedom and rights. Marx highlights that the lords’ ability to profit from the serfs’ excess labour is an example of surplus labour, which, for Marx, is also the defining characteristic of capitalism.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx’s argument of exploitation for workers by the superstructure of capitalism is supported by Globalisation. This is shown through the case study in Bangladesh where factory fires are occurring due to the lack of health and safety observations being enforced by NGO's such as Apple and Primark. Low wages and long working hours which are intolerable are also an issue which is allowing the poverty cycle to recurrence which is leading to an increase of death rates and spread of diseases. This shows that it is unacceptable for society to run efficiently like this, the view that the working class are constantly being exploited by the upper class and are incapable to improve the way they live is undermined, an example to back this point is that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In capitalist societies, people become just a piece in the puzzle when what they work for isn’t theirs and their lives are controlled by others of higher classes. When human alienation occurs, people lose their stateliness which leads to people being treated as animals. According to Karl Marx, capitalism creates a division in a society. It creates class of labor. People who were once useful and a major part of the system, suddenly become useless nobodies.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalism Conflict Theory Symbolic Interactionism View of society “Society is made up of connected structures”. (www.youtube.com-sydney brown) Society is mutually reinforcing, creating interdependence. When one part of society is under strain, the other parts counterbalance.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays