Analysis Of Gospel Of Wealth By Andrew Carnegie

Good Essays
Rough Draft #2

If you had the option to decide who controls society, who would you elect? Carnegie or Marx? Both of these distinguished men have different perspectives on the way right way society should function.The passage “Gospel of Wealth,” by Andrew Carnegie talks about the distribution of wealth and the responsibilities of those who have it. Carnegie makes the case that the best way of dealing with wealth inequality is for the super rich to redistribute their money in a responsible and attentive manner. On the other hand, Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” is about communism, which is when the proletarians overthrow the bourgeois by starting a revolution. The main goal of a communist is to demolish the hierarchical society and establish
…show more content…
All in all, Marx and Carriage had two very distinct approaches in how society should function, but Carnegie better is more rational because it excludes the possibility of a revolution.
One topic that Carnegie and Marx disagree with is class relations. Carnegie believed that people who worked hard deserved to have a successful life, however, he does suggest that affluent should deal diminishing the gap between the rich and poor. He states “The best minds will thus have reached a stage of development of the race in which it is clearly seen that no mode of disposing of surplus wealth creditable to thoughtful and earnest men into whose hands it flows save by using it year by year for the general good.”(372). This quote is significant because
…show more content…
In order to comprehend both Carnegie and Marx perspectives, one must scrutinize their viewpoints concerning the subject. Carnegie believed the means of production benefited the nation, which it did. Carnegie states “To-day the world obtains commodities of excellent quality at prices which even the generation preceding this would have deemed incredible.”(365) This quote is important because it shows that the creation of factories and businesses, allowed society to enjoy goods marked at a fair price and adequate quality. Over time, the means of production continues to thrive and technology continues to improve, which has allowed people to purchase qualities that used to be deemed a luxury. On the contrary, Marx believes that the rise of factory buildings and businesses causes mass production which negatively affects society. He argues that overproduction can cause an economic crisis. This issue will only harm businesses or industries because if overproduction will occur in one or more businesses at once, the entire economy will collapse. This will lead to the unemployment rate to rise. Marx focuses on the working conditions of the employees. He blames the rises means of production will only harm the proletarians. He declares “Not only are the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Adam Smith advocates that division of labour and specialisation is the finest way to produce goods as firms can become extremely efficient and produce numerous more goods in a day as the production is divided into various parts. Karl Marx disagrees with this method as he states this will cause a state of alienation. Due to the face workers are only working on a portion of the good rather than producing the whole good itself, they are alienated from the product and do not feel a sense of accomplishment or satisfaction when working. Which will cause a reduction in labour morale. Both of these two economist provide us with theories that are both extremely useful and important to modern day economics.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This reorganization will make it that production benefits collectively as a whole. The proletariat constitutes a vast exploited and alienated workforce while the bourgeois seizes political power. Marx had two predictions concerning the demise of capitalism. One prediction deals with the fact that capitalism is unstable and that we are unable to escape the recessions and depressions. The second deals with the modern working class, the proletarians, becoming impoverished and alienated.…

    • 2725 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the debate between Mises and Marx continued, other philosophers would also debate if capitalism and socialism was better, and how each system would affect the entire society. Marx was against capitalism because of the gap between the two social classes that the capitalist system formed. Marx saw this struggle first hand during the Industrial Revolution and decided to write in his “Communist Manifesto”. He saw how the working poor became more of a commodity as the bourgeoisie obtained more and more power. Marx said that capitalism would make the rich richer and the poor poorer.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In direct contrast to this, Carnegie believes that, in the capitalist system, the relations between the two classes is more symbiotic in nature. As one group benefits from the labors of another, the other eventually shares in the same benefits through the philanthropy of the first group. This relationship would have, for both groups, continuous improvements and as Carnegie puts it, “What were the luxuries have become the necessaries of life” (Carnegie 365). In this way, He argues that even though there is a distinction between the rich and the poor, the lives of the poor are in no way facing the same difficulties or disadvantages of the…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The power and money obsessed bourgeoisie is the cause of the revolution. Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. Every upper class needs a lower class which therefore in turn means capitalism needs a lower class and with the bourgeoisie exploiting the working class Marx knew it would lead to resentment causing the proletariats to revolt. The bourgeoisie were the antagonists for the revolution of the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Firstly this text will look at Durkheim’s concept of anomie, this concept states that if a society experiences a major social change, the result of this will cause disruption and lead to a breakdown in social norms due to this, individuals have a sense of “normlessness”. This in turn leaves them to feel cut off from society or anomic. This text will then look towards Marx’s concept of alienation. The concept of alienation maintains that in an industrialised capitalist society, a worker will become alienated from his work, this will be elaborated on later in the text. Following a brief description the two concepts will be analysed to uncover any similarities or differences between them.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Marx, this system would lead the society to self destruct. He believed the the continuation of exploitation would cause the proletariat to hate the bourgeoisie. As with most large-scale conflicts, the hatred would lead to war—a revolution. The revolution would most likely result in the overthrow of capitalism and those who support it. Then a new equal society would rise until the cycle…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx believes that the increase in trade has made the bourgeoisie class selfish. This is one of the reasons Marx has no faith in a capitalist society. He believes that the working class or proletariat needs to overthrow the bourgeoisie and that private property should be abolished (Marx 22-23). Abolishing private property would get rid of tension between classes. Owning private property is a capitalist idea therefore it needs to be abolished.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When we think of communism we think of government’s such as present day North Korea and Lenin’s Soviet Union. These countries had communistic philosophy in mind, but ultimately created a government that resembled more than anything social totalitarianism. This is because these governments relied on the state to control all the aspects of society, whereas in a true communistic society, the society is all-powerful and there is no room for the state. In his book, Communist Manifesto, Marx talks about the history of human society and emphasizes the true meaning of communism. Marx argues that the history of human society is the history of class struggles.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx is distraught by the terrible exploitation of workers and offers a very viable solution. He proclaims “WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES UNITE!” because he wants the proletariat to work together to topple the hierarchy that is constantly exploiting them. He advocates for two types of revolution. Marx says that the working class can either use force and death or they can use the government to their advantage. If the proletariat vote in people who will support them, they will be able to have better conditions and decrease the power of the…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays