Summary Of The Critique Of Capitalism By Karl Marx

Superior Essays
There are two types of reproduction. The first, the reproduction of the character of a worker. Why does the average person go to work? Is it because she loves what she is doing, or is it because she needs to work in order to live? Marx explains, “the exercise of labour power, labour, is the worker’s own life-activity, the manifestation of his own life. And this life-activity he sells to another person in order to secure the necessary means of subsistence (204).” Marx highlights that the worker continues the labour specifically because it is the “means of subsistence” ie. the only way to live. The character of the worker is one who, while hating having to work, continuously works because it is her only option. The second type of reproduction is the reproduction of the physical worker. Workers are hired and fired--reproduced in the workplace with a turnover that is normalized in society. …show more content…
In this essay, I address how Karl Marx in The Critique of Capitalism and Louis Althusser in the Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses demonstrate that institutional forces within capitalist societies have upheld the power dynamics central to capitalism, and the main driving force that allows this upholding to persist is reproduction.
Marx explains that in order for capitalism to continue the reproduction of the character of the worker and reproduction of worker needs to exist. The feudal system, in Marx’ eyes, persisted only when feudalism was widely accepted and endorsed by society. For capitalism it is the same. Capitalism is in the very fabric of society which is why the reproduction of the character of the worker has persisted. In the Critique of Capitalism Marx states, “the relations of production in their totality constitute what are called the social relations, society, and, specifically, a society at a definite stage of historical development, a society with a peculiar, distinctive character (207). ” In layman's terms Marx is expressing that our economic system (production) shapes (constitute) the fabrics of our society. The “social relations” currently upheld were created by the “relations of production” devise the dynamics in which the capitalist exploits the worker and thus reproduces her. In market terms, there is always a greater supply for workers than there is the demand for workers. Because of this imbalance, capitalist are able to pay workers low wages, causing the worker to work more in order to produce the money she needs to live. Therefore, she keeps going to work because she has to work thus reproducing the character of the worker. In addition, Marx explains, “the very cost of [this] reproduction [is] whereby the race of workers is enabled to multiply and replace worn-out workers by new ones (206).” Since there are more workers than there are jobs there is an entire reserve army of labour that the capitalist can tap into once they exhaust their old exploited laborer. Thus the reproduction of the physical worker is also reproduced by the capitalist society. Capitalism relies on this reproduction, without which the economy and capitalist structures of society would collapse. By society indoctrinating the institutions of capitalism, the character of the worker is reproduced, and from this character, the turnover system continues and the worker herself is also reproduced. Althusser goes a step further than Marx by illustrating the fabrics of our society that specifically cause this reproduction. Althusser states, “not only does the State Apparatus contribute generously to its own reproduction…, but also and above all, the State apparatus secures by repression the political conditions for action of the Ideological State Apparatus. In fact, it is the latter which largely secure the reproduction specifically of relations of production...(24).” Althusser highlights two types of institutions that allow the reproduction of the character of the worker and the physical worker. These institutions are Ideological State Apparatus (IRA) and Repressive State Apparatus (RSA). ISAs are a function by ideology, they are things that the individual person recognizes, and subjects themselves to willingly. ISAs are things like schools, church, family, and media. For example, the family institutes reproduction of the worker with capitalism. The breadwinners of the family need to continue going to work to make money and thus have incentive to recreate the character of the worker. The children, at one time, will take over the job of the tired breadwinners and therefore

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx defined society as being broken up into the base and superstructure. Marx described the base in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy as the means of “production” that “constitutes the economic structure of society”, while the superstructure is the “social, political and intellectual life” that makes up the “social consciousness.” Moreover, in Marx and Engels’ The Communist Manifesto, they elucidate on the development of capitalism and the need for a global revolution. Through this work, as well as the works of other Marxist writers, one can see the ways in which capitalism has become hegemonic, what political theorist Antonio Gramsci termed as “the success of the dominant classes in presenting their definition of reality”…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx And Engels Analysis

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marx’s belief in the political economy as an evil, in the tying together of the politic and the monetary is inherently anti-capitalist; capitalism being a system which demands structure, division and to Marx and Engels’ derision, commodification of the self. M.C. Howard and J.E. King in The Political Economy of Marx, reinforce the prevalent idea in Marx and Engels’ commentary that there is a connection between product relations and class relations. The worker is the product, a disposable one, and as Howard and King suggest, a thing there is liable to be a surplus of, like any product. In a moral sense, the idea of humans as equal to surplus materials is on the side of immoral, although it is in a capitalist society a very real truth. Political economy is at its heart about surplus, a surplus of materials, and a surplus of wealth, or profit.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx critiques the political economy for production “in this society of free competition the individual seems detached from the natural ties, etc., which in earlier historical epochs make him an appurtenance of a particular, limited human conglomeration” (Marx, “Preface and Introduction,” p.9). Marx is discussing how society has evolved from a cohesive group to an individualized formation where a person aims for his own motives. Individuals do not look out for the interests of their groups, but focus on their personal wants and…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A capitalist society, according to Marxism, is characterised by the division of labour, exploitation, the class struggle and the class conflict between the capitalists and the labourers as a result of the pursuit of profit (Marsh, 1996, p. 53). It is made up certain structures which enable the society to accumulate wealth and the role of the society is to maintain their structure (Best, 2003, p. 54). This essay will demonstrate the structures of a capitalists society and the contradictions within it while using a relevant and contemporary example of this is in a modern society, in South Africa today. Karl Marx describes the society as being made up structures which inhabit social relationships and these structures are external and coercive…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx’s analysis has inspired a great deal of sociological research and is fundamental in understanding contemporary society. However, there is some debate on the accuracy of Marx’s analysis of capitalism. Due to his moral point…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism has been the main economic system in the western world since the feudal society. With its basis in globalisation and industrialisation, modern capitalism focuses on privatising the means of production and driven by ”production for exchange”. One of the main ideas behind capitalism is capital accumulation, where the purpose for production is profit and accumulation capital. This divides people into two categories, those who own and make profit, and the labour force. In response to capitalism following the industrial revolution, socialism and marxism arose.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss capitalism as a system using influential theorists such as Karl Marx and Erich Fromm to explain in detail the influences this system has on our modern day relationships; with specific focus on the western wedding as the epitome of capitalistic control on intimacy. Capitalism can be explained as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, as opposed to the state (Marx, 1956). It is characterised by innovation and invention working together to produce and exchange commodities in order to accumulate wealth, and a need to maintain this wealth for future accumulation, thus creating a relentless search for profit and controlling almost all aspects of our western culture. Karl Marx, a social scientist and political philosopher with many influential writings on capitalism, explains that while capitalist methods of thinking and doing can be dated back to the middle ages, capitalism as a system is dated from the sixteenth century. Developing out of feudal societies where a select group of lords would control serfs or slaves, who provided manual labour for their masters in order to live (Marx, 1956), and although this system has vastly progressed throughout the…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my life I have seen my mother struggle with Marx’s theories of exploitation, and false consciousness, and Weber’s theory of the iron cage of rationality. According to Marx, a major form of exploitation is found in wage labor. As defined in the lecture, wage labor is money compensation per time unit worked (Lecture 3). In order to maintain capital, the elite exploit the laborer and give them only what is necessary to survive.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Megan Miller Professor Eliasoph Sociological Theory 12 October 2015 Karl Marx—Contradictory Argument Karl Marx was a remarkable social theorist, in regards to the examination of philosophical and economic production. He believed that the evolution of society was comprised of motile antithetical components, which generated change through conflict. As such, the process of progression was a construction of strife, rather than harmonious growth. According to Marx, in every society, the origin of social order was determined by the production of economic commodities. The organization of the social system was insistent upon the way in which individuals existed in relation to nature.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx, in Capital, describes it very succinctly by explaining that it is the way in which men produce their means of subsistence is dependent on the nature of the actual means they find in existence and have to reproduce. Human society in this sense consists of two parts: a base and a superstructure. The base is comprised of the forces of production, and the relations of production. This includes the employer, employee relationship, and technical divisions of labour. Upon this rests the superstructure.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism also alienated workers from their “species being.” Marx believed that work was forced, and that those who create the wealth are…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays