Summary Of The Critique Of Capitalism By Karl Marx

Superior Essays
There are two types of reproduction. The first, the reproduction of the character of a worker. Why does the average person go to work? Is it because she loves what she is doing, or is it because she needs to work in order to live? Marx explains, “the exercise of labour power, labour, is the worker’s own life-activity, the manifestation of his own life. And this life-activity he sells to another person in order to secure the necessary means of subsistence (204).” Marx highlights that the worker continues the labour specifically because it is the “means of subsistence” ie. the only way to live. The character of the worker is one who, while hating having to work, continuously works because it is her only option. The second type of reproduction …show more content…
In this essay, I address how Karl Marx in The Critique of Capitalism and Louis Althusser in the Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses demonstrate that institutional forces within capitalist societies have upheld the power dynamics central to capitalism, and the main driving force that allows this upholding to persist is reproduction.
Marx explains that in order for capitalism to continue the reproduction of the character of the worker and reproduction of worker needs to exist. The feudal system, in Marx’ eyes, persisted only when feudalism was widely accepted and endorsed by society. For capitalism it is the same. Capitalism is in the very fabric of society which is why the reproduction of the character of the worker has persisted. In the Critique of Capitalism Marx states, “the relations of production in their totality constitute what are called the social relations, society, and, specifically, a society at a definite stage of historical development, a society with a peculiar, distinctive character (207). ” In layman's terms Marx is expressing that our economic system (production) shapes (constitute) the fabrics of our society. The “social relations” currently upheld

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first idea, the alienation of the worker from the product of his labor is discussed, and with this idea the conclusion is made that the worker is unable to identify himself with the object he produces. The worker invests his labor and in a way his labor becomes an object that doesn’t belong to him. The worker isn’t able to use his creative abilities in order to produce products for himself, and as a result the worker produces products that he may not be able to initially get his hands on outside of work. Next, Marx focuses on the alienation of the worker from the activity of production.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states that this is wearing on a person who loses pieces of himself/herself each day they go to work. When he states that the workers are alienated from the productive activity, he is referring to class structure. While the workers are making so little each year, their bosses are bringing in loads of money. Next, they are alienated from the species-being, meaning they cannot freely produce creatively for the species – a uniquely human function. When this function is denied, Marx states that people revert back to animal functions including hunger, sex, and simple pleasures.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Philosopher Karl Marx (1818), proposed relations of production, caused the division of classes. The two classes Marx identifies are the Bourgeoisie owners of means of production and the Proletariat, who do not have this advantage, consequently, they sell their labour to the Bourgeoisie who exploit them. Marx argues “The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political and intellectual life process in general” (Anthony, 2013)…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx was German and was born in Prussia. His thesis being something along the lines that one should not look at theology to explain human history, but one should look at philosophy. In London, he did most of his writings and he wrote for newspapers around the world to pay his bills. He had an organization that promoted the ideas of socialism. Marx is going to say that in modern historical time, the two big classes are the bourgeoisies, which was in power, and the class that is out of power is the proletarians.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The bourgeoisie by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian nations into civilisation… It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e. to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.” (Marx 477) As the ruling class continues to accumulate this amalgamation of influence and power they must “constantly revolutionize the instruments of production” (Marx 476) to keep pace with increasing technology and the uneasy partnership with the proletarians.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the past decade there has been a shift in the way capitalism has been viewed by historians. There are those who feel that Marx’s linear and unchanging description of capitalist systems is insufficient to explain the actual history of what is in actuality a dynamic and complex system. These new historians of capitalism began to emerge and look at capitalists and capitalism in a different light. These historians began to connect capitalist endeavors with politics, people, places and culture. If one looks at capitalist institution not as profit seeking automatons, but as actual places, with actual people, then the view changes.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism has been the main economic system in the western world since the feudal society. With its basis in globalisation and industrialisation, modern capitalism focuses on privatising the means of production and driven by ”production for exchange”. One of the main ideas behind capitalism is capital accumulation, where the purpose for production is profit and accumulation capital. This divides people into two categories, those who own and make profit, and the labour force. In response to capitalism following the industrial revolution, socialism and marxism arose.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx defined society as being broken up into the base and superstructure. Marx described the base in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy as the means of “production” that “constitutes the economic structure of society”, while the superstructure is the “social, political and intellectual life” that makes up the “social consciousness.” Moreover, in Marx and Engels’ The Communist Manifesto, they elucidate on the development of capitalism and the need for a global revolution. Through this work, as well as the works of other Marxist writers, one can see the ways in which capitalism has become hegemonic, what political theorist Antonio Gramsci termed as “the success of the dominant classes in presenting their definition of reality”…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss capitalism as a system using influential theorists such as Karl Marx and Erich Fromm to explain in detail the influences this system has on our modern day relationships; with specific focus on the western wedding as the epitome of capitalistic control on intimacy. Capitalism can be explained as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, as opposed to the state (Marx, 1956). It is characterised by innovation and invention working together to produce and exchange commodities in order to accumulate wealth, and a need to maintain this wealth for future accumulation, thus creating a relentless search for profit and controlling almost all aspects of our western culture. Karl Marx, a social scientist and political philosopher with many influential writings on capitalism, explains that while capitalist methods of thinking and doing can be dated back to the middle ages, capitalism as a system is dated from the sixteenth century. Developing out of feudal societies where a select group of lords would control serfs or slaves, who provided manual labour for their masters in order to live (Marx, 1956), and although this system has vastly progressed throughout the…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays