Gulf War Vs Us-Iraq War

Improved Essays
In the 1990, the Middle East and the whole World changed. On August 2, Iraq invaded Kuwait and began the brutal occupation. Iraq was not the only country affected.
The invasion created a global conflict, which lasts to this day. Many people thought that wars are a thing of the past and there is no place for them in the modern society of the
20th society. Were those war necessary? Would the Middle East would resolve their problems on their own, without the interference from the United States and United
Nation? When no one knows what it is about, it is probably about money. In the case of the Gulf War, money and oil were main reason behind the war. At that time, Saddam
Hussein was the president of Iraq - ruling with an iron fist for over 24 years. It was not
…show more content…
Many people thought that it is not right to interfere with the politics of the other countries. Some thought that there is no other way. There was a large difference between the Gulf War and the US - Iraq war.
In the first case, there was a common consent of the world leaders; everyone wanted to help Kuwait and condemned Iraq 's actions. In 2003, people in Europe and the
Middle East were against the war. Even in the United States, Americans protested against the invasion. President Bush decision to send troops to Iraq was criticized even more, the longer the war was taking. It did not help that there was no weapons of mass destruction ever found in Iraq. There was also a large difference in number of casualties of both wars. In the Gulf War, about 400 troops from the
International Forces died and about 35,000 Iraqi people were killed. It was estimated that during the period of 2003 - 2006, about 655,000 Iraqi soldiers and civilians lost their lives. The United States lost 3,533 soldiers and over 53,000 were wounded.
The United Nation lost almost 300 troops. Were those war necessary? Would the world be just fine without them? Unfortunately, we will never

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is not sufficient democracy in Iraq, the middle east really isn 't anymore evolved now than it was when we first sent troops in, and our relationship with Iraq is still in shambles. In conclusion, going to war with Iraq was done with the intentions to help make this increasingly oppressive state, free from the chains and whips that it is founded from. We as Americans wanted to help spread democracy, so that the Iraq could finally have civil liberties, and even a thriving economy. That goal sadly was not accomplished, because of the lack of cultural understanding, violence, and the sheer number of people that we were up against. However, there is still hope that one day Iraq and the middle east will become an area of democracy.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnson had a large influence in the media. Johnson introduced the “credibility gap” in his time of presidency, caused by his inability to speak honestly to the country about overseas occurrences (Dallek, “Lyndon Johnson”). Therefore, Americans could not truly tell what was really happening. With the credibility gap, Johnson tried to keep public discussion away from the war in order to keep attention on his reforms as he believed conservatives would kill his proposals (Dallek, “Lyndon Johnson”). As stated by Robert Dallek, “he escalated the war without consulting those who would have to fight and support it.” This shows that the president’s altered information resulted in a lot of disapproval of those who really had to go through the war.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vietnam, a Necessary War? The Vietnam War is very controversial in the sense that people disagree over whether America should have entered or not. Two people who capture the feelings of both sides well are Michael Lind who wrote “A Necessary War” and Fredrik Logevall who wrote “An Avoidable Catastrophe”. Both of these works represent either side of the controversy of entering the war. Lind appeal to the audience through rebuttals and perspective of the time, while Logevall seems to just knock all of the points made to go to war and staying at war aside, offering little sympathy for President Lyndon Johnson, and other American leaders at the time.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Foreign Policy Dbq

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before Pearl Harbor, most Americans were isolationists. That is, they didn’t want to get involved in a war that was taking place across the entire world. The US did this because we didn’t want to waste supplies, resources, and money on a war when we could be using all of that to help the depression that we were still recovering from. The Republicans famously reported, “The Republican Party is firmly opposed to involving this nation in a foreign war. We are still suffering from the ill effects of the last World War…” (Document E).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War of 1812 is describe as one of the most needless of war that nobody like at the time besides the political governing bodies who support it. The cause of the war which was the impressment of US sailors was actually ended by British parliament right before they declared war. Gordon Wood in his book The Empire of Liberty describes and elaborates on this, “It turns out that many Americans did not want to go to war either; the leaders of the governing Republican Party were devoted to the idea of creating a universal peace and has spent the previous decade desperately trying to avoid war…it was the Republican party, which most loathed war and all that war entailed in taxes, debt, and executive power, that took the country into the war, and some Republicans did it with enthusiasm.” (Pg 660) This has similarity to many wars that the Americans have done from the Spanish – American War and the Mexican – American…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is there a right opinion? The United States should not have gone to war becuase: most of the alleged mass destruction were lies and misperception of Iraq, the amount of money that has been spent on the war, the amount of lives taken (american, taliban, children, men, women, it doesn 't matter), the chaos caused by iraq 's government being picked apart and shut down, all the looting, rape, etc. and foremost the illegal actions that were taken to start the war with Iraq. With all this…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, many do not agree with us who believes we should go to war. For example, if we go to war, it will bring honor to America. I spoke with Henry Clay, a Kentucky congressman, who is for the war. He says that honor is our most valuable thing to America at the moment since we are a new nation. He also states that the British does not respect the American flag and will keep doing it until we lose all of our honor and respect.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The immediate reports of Tet gave reporters who opposed the War like Joseph Kraft evidence against it, “The war in Vietnam is unwinnable, and the longer it goes on the more the Americans will be subjected to losses and humiliation (Herring 2014)”. A New York Times story reporting that we were considering sending those 206,000 more troops added to the furor. Setting off a barrage of protests even though the president never accepted the request. Leading to Congress wanting an explanation. The media had successfully shifted the discussion on the War with an untrue story.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay About Going To War

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since then, I firmly believe this decision is regrettable and has ineffectively communicated our nation’s initiatives in nonverbal context. I believe that President Bush’s decision to go to war after the 9/11 terrorist attacks were bad for our country for multiple reasons. Lockett John said, "Citizens look to the president and administration for leadership in times of perceived crisis”. During the decision-making process of declaring war on Iraq, George W. Bush and his administration did not act sufficiently in their role. In his speech to congress and the American people, he claims that “justice will be done” (Bush, GW).…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A counter cultural group the Yippies took imaginative action, raided offices of draft boards, and Civil Rights leader, Martin Luther King, also spoke against the war. Other non-violent action such as blockades of roads and streets became common. The Tet offensive conducted by North Vietnam on January 30, 1968 shocked the American public. It can be said that the Tet offensive was a turning point in the war because it influenced the American public who realized that the entire war was senseless and there was no strategy to end the war. The Tet offensive occurred around the same time that the government considered General Westmoreland’s request for 206,000 additional troops.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays