Comparing Aristotle's Ideas Of Right And Wrong

Improved Essays
Around the year 470 BC, the ideas of right verses wrong have been a very influential factor in life and this started with Socrates who had the first initial thoughts of right and wrong, to Plato who then incorporated the mind and soul, and then to Aristotle who took science into account. Due to each one of these famous philosophers, we are somewhat able to understand why we have morals and ethics and what right from wrong truly is. Though, we will never know the full answer and truth, we can at least begin to understand right from wrong thanks to these philosophers and their many famous ideas. Socrates, who was one of the first philosophers starting his studies around the year 470 BC started to set a path for every philosopher to follow him …show more content…
Aristotle was a student of Plato whom gave him many ideas that Aristotle added onto as well as started to construct his own beliefs on right and wrong and the relevance of everything as a whole. Aristotle became the earliest scientist, he believed that each activity that has occurred or will occur has a final cause. Aristotle changed Plato’s idea that thoughts were greater than senses; Aristotle states that the senses were needed in order to properly determine reality. Each of the five senses have a part in the way we see reality, and since we all see reality slightly differently we must take them into consideration when deciding what our morals are. Therefore, the senses are the most important when deciding something is right from wrong. Just knowing right and wrong is not enough, a person must choose how to act properly to create any habit of having appropriate and good morals. This view changed drastically from Socrates, to Plato and then to Aristotle who started to put a scientific look into the philosophy of doing right versus wrong. The scientific reasoning behind Aristotle’s work helped him build this character of doing good based on the studies that he did and the concepts he

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle decided to take on the subject of the good in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle argues that every person must make a choice to act good. Within his ideas of the good it is imperative that men take responsibility for their own actions and that they understand what their own intentions are doing in relation to the good. However, there are some oppositions that believe this is not the case. They would argue that men have no control over how something appears to them or how they perceive it, and that for every man the final end/good/happiness looks differently.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill were two famous philosophers known for their studies in politics. Aristotle believes the best form of government is a polis, while Mill believes a more laid back structure is better. He believes the people should be ruled by the harm principles. Although they have very different ideas on how the people should be ruled, there are many similarities between the two. Aristotle was a great philosopher from the BC era.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Aristotle 's argument for the ultimate human good and how it relates to virtue is not so much a search for good for goods sake but for the highest good that a human being can ascertain in that persons experience and travels in life. So then how is it that Aristotle argument has validity to an over all understanding or relation to virtue? It is not an easy philosophical quandary to disseminate considering other philosophers have studied Aristotle 's teachings and spent the most part of their careers arguing against (in cases) this very prose.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To determine what is right and good in life, a person must experience the wrong and bad in order to differentiate and truly achieve what is right and good based upon knowledge from these…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will explain what the function argument is and what role it plays in Aristotle’s ethics. This essay will then be explicating, how successful the functional argument is. On the former, this essay will consider why the function argument is not deemed as successful and why it is problematic. From this, the essay will come to conclusion that, the function argument is successful, even though it has certain flaws.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While analyzing the Tao-te-Ching, many major themes are apparent. From the inevitability of change to the importance of non-action, the Tao-te-Ching is truly full of life lessons that deserve extensive analysis; however, one of the most prevalent and recurring themes is balance and its importance. Throughout Cultural Perspectives, many authors have addressed this same theme. Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, Plato, and Saint Augustine have all discussed this important topic; however, Aristotle best complements and contrasts Lao Tzu’s Tao-te-Ching in his work Nichmachean Ethics. When comparing and contrasting these two texts, one can see that these two authors had very similar ideas on the concept of balance. When comparing the two texts’ thoughts…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision between what is right and wrong is depending on your beliefs or how you were raised. Adultery is a huge wrong in the Bible, and Iran a great example as the punishment for it. Discussing on the views of Aristotle and the Utilitarian’s. After that discussion there will be a compare and contrast between the two which both already has some similarities. I prefer Aristotle’s view more because it doesn’t have as big of a consequence that the Utilitarian view has.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Aristotle defines and contrasts both practical and theoretical wisdom. Practical wisdom is defined by Aristotle as being, “a truthful rational characteristic of acting in matters involving what is good for man” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 154). In other words, practical wisdom is concerned with deciding what a good course of action for man is. On the other hand about theoretical wisdom, Aristotle writes, “a wise man must not only know what follows from fundamental principles, but he must also have true knowledge of the fundamental principles themselves. Accordingly, theoretical wisdom must comprise both intelligence and scientific knowledge”(Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a certain extent, Aristotle is similar in his philosophy to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, but now completely. He also believes in a universal good in order to achieve happiness in life. According to Aristotle, mortality and good is understood in terms of a whole life. Contrary to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, that understand moral obligation in terms of human individual actions, instead of examining a whole lifetime. According to Aristotle “good” can be found in many forms.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the Good Life? Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are known as great men of thought and, though they didn’t start philosophy, they are pioneers of that field and some of their thoughts are still used today. While some of the philosopher’s opinions and viewpoints are very different form each other they all end up focusing on one question, “What is the good life?” Even though they don’t see eye to eye on quite a few things they still agree that the good life is the ultimate goal that all men strive for.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assignment 5: Long Paper 1 According to Aristotle, the best life to live is a life of pursuing knowledge. Not only pursuing it but understanding it too. Virtue is a very important aspect that one needs to consider when trying to live an all around good life. As a writer named Christine puts it: Like others before him, such as Socrates and Plato, Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who was interested in the best way to live a good life and to cultivate virtue.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics