Virtue Of Character In Nicomachean Ethics By Aristotle

Superior Essays
Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and …show more content…
Virtue of thought is related to human reasoning, especially those regarding science and rationality. Virtue of character is a state, which is one’s perspective in relation to one’s own feelings, as in whether one is better or worse off due to them. A virtue is defined as such because Aristotle deduces that one ought not to be praised or blamed for having a certain feeling, or for being capable of having it; however, one can be praised or blamed for one’s reaction towards such feeling. Reacting poorly should incur in blame, while reacting nicely should incur in praise. Furthermore, a good state would need to be proportionate to the situation. For example, if a person accidentally stumbles on you, spilling your coffee, it would be okay to feel anger, since you are capable of it, but your reaction is what shows who you are. If you understand that accidents happen and let it go, for instance, that should be praiseworthy, considering the accepted norms of conduct within this hypothetical society. If you, on the other hand, decides to stab the person with a knife, that is a blameworthy action, which was utterly disproportionate to the occurrence. Thus, your state is what can be praiseworthy or blameworthy, since that is what you translated into the world; it is the true …show more content…
Too much of it makes one reckless and rash, while too little bravery makes one a coward. For instance, imagine a person who cannot swim being faced with a situation in which a child is drowning in a pool. If one has an excess of bravery, one may attempt to jump into the pool to try and save the child, but, since one cannot swim, this may end up disastrously, with even perhaps two casualties. In that case, that person, despite displaying a great amount of bravery (which can often be mistakenly construed as good), ought to be blamed for being unreasonable and reckless. Conversely, if one has a deficiency of bravery, one may just freeze in place and watch the child drown, without taking any action whatsoever to save him or her. That person, then, ought to be blamed for being a coward and not helping at all; plus, in this case, the person has to live with the remorse and shame. Thus, as indicated above, the extremes cause failure, but searching for a state in between them - the mean - will most likely lead to success. Following the example, if one acts by calling someone else who can swim to save the child, or even find a rope or a floatie to throw into the water, then one was simply brave, acting prudently in a manner that is relative to one’s own capabilities (or limitations) and to the situation at

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s book, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is commenced with perhaps the utmost important segment of his novel: “Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action as well as choice, is held to aim at some good” (Nic. Ethics, 1094a1-2). Thereafter, it becomes evident that the ‘good’ that Aristotle is referring to is not synonymous with the word “good’s” contemporarily conventional definition; instead, Aristotle’s use of ‘good’ seems to have an unreachable, yet vastly desirable connotation. Therefore, the concept of a seemingly unattainable highest ‘good’ becomes undeniably manifest.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What does Aristotle define as virtue in N icomachean Ethics? It is stated in the text that “ Virtue, then is a state that decides, consisting in a mean, the mean relative to us, which is defined by reference to reason...,”1 (NE II.6 §15) to properly understand this quote and what Aristotle means by it, we must also understand that Aristotle distinguishes between two different forms of virtue. Said virtues are virtues of Character and virtues of Thought. Firstly, virtues of Character are “those that pertain to the part of the soul that cannot itself reason but is nonetheless capable of following reason”2 . Meaning said virtues are those which pertain to ethics and the character of the person. Think of it this way, virtue of character preserves…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the universe in the article Nicomachean Ethics is virtue where he states that virtue is a state of being. Aristotle talks about happiness, and he emphasizes that happiness is important because it reflects fulfill and success in our lives on what we think we are doing right in the world. He mentions that we all identify differently on different things such as happiness because that depends on our individual emotional state. Also, he mentions that we have two parts of our soul one is rational and the other irrational. Rational meaning if we can control our impulses then being virtue can lead to having a more rationally control of our impulses.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Life of Practical Virtue and the Life of Study: Comparing the Means to Happiness in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle's ethics seeks to find the ways of living that are best suited for the human disposition to achieve eudaimonia, or happiness and flourishing. His philosophical project in Nicomachean Ethics defines the features of the good life and revolves around the discussion of human activity, the role of virtue, and eudaimonia as the ultimate telos of all human endeavour. The good life, according to Aristotle, is the life that is characterized by the cultivation of and enacting of virtues, which, in turn, results in the genuine experience of happiness. However, in Book X, Aristotle reveals the life of study and contemplation…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature gives us the ability to accept virtue, and the maturity of this ability is accomplished by habit. Aristotle believes virtue is a state of character concerned with choice, and the best of choice of virtue is intermediate. For example, courage is between recklessness and cowardice. If one avoids everything for fear, does not dare to insist, one will become a coward; on the contrary, fearless, rampage on everything, one will become a boor. In all admirable emotions and actions, there is an intermediate…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s Aporia in NE II.4 In NE II.4, Aristotle claims what virtuous action should look like. Consequently, a puzzle (aporia) is generated. Aristotle provides three features that virtuous activity requires, and two ways of performing just actions to attempt solving this aporia. This paper is divided into five sections: (I) The 3 Necessary Conditions for Virtue; (II) Aristotelean Motivations for Believing Virtuous Activity Possesses these 3 Conditions; (III) How the Aporia is Generated by Aristotle’s Assumptions about Virtue;…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, he discusses how a person can become virtuous, and how that relates to the implementation of politics in Athenian society. Aristotle argues that the only way a person can develop a virtuous character is by a process of forcing himself to do virtuous activities. Just like any other skill, virtue has to be learned over time. Aristotle believes that eventually doing virtuous actions will become habit, giving you a virtuous character. Aristotle states that nobody is born having virtue, and as a result, the process of habituation is a long and difficult one.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle’s basic view of ethics is that people do everything that they can for the sake of happiness and that the human virtues are those of the soul, not the body. His theory on virtues explores how morality, which is closely connected to our functions or purpose as human beings, involves obtaining good character traits, which create virtuous individuals. Aristotle’s virtue theory claims that activities have values and specify that it is required for humans to assign a specific character trait to activities depending on the differences of the activities to create a predetermined value. A virtue is a habit or an acquired human quality of character that allows humans to achieve personal happiness while vices are the opposite and ruin an individual 's chances and goals of achieving personal happiness. While the main motive of consideration for the utilitarian is the consequence of direct actions, the people are the primary object of consideration in the virtue theory. .…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Nicomachean Ethics, we are provided with Aristotle’s philosophy regarding the nature of virtue. He aims at explaining what virtue is, how it is acquired, and how it is related to both happiness (eudaimonia) and friendships. Overall, Aristotle is addressing the questions of: “What is a human being’s telos (purpose)?” and “What is the highest good?” It is by answering these questions that we will be able to see how Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is related to both Socrates and Epictetus’ philosophy, not to mention how it has contributed to my understanding of generosity, and virtue overall.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle discusses human life and identifies happiness to be its ultimate goal. To achieve Eudaimonia, person has to be occupied by rational activity and at the same time, lead a virtuous life. Eudaimonia will be defined shortly and it should be noted that it will be used interchangeably with the word happiness. The ensuing paragraphs will explain Aristotle’s theory, followed by its discussion. The essay will identify ethical theory’s main strength and its weaknesses, which on the whole will undermine the model.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his design, Aristotle states that virtue is manifested through an individual’s actions. Aristotle contends that in order to obtain moral and intellectual virtues, reason and the aim of happiness must be in accordance. An aspect of virtuous living is practical reasoning, which is the ability to decipher…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Virtue

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are three bad shapes of character: vice, incontinence, and brutishness. Contrary to these are the virtue, continence, and superhuman virtue. A virtuous person’s wishes are aligned with a reasonable rationale so that virtuous act is satisfying and leading to happiness. According to Aristotle, one of an essential condition for a person to be virtuous is that he takes pleasure in acting virtuously.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Virtue Theory

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I realise upon reflection of my decision in the ethical dilemma we were presented with, that my moral commitments are generally that of a virtue theorist’s. My course of action, firing Mr Lawlor, but keeping him on as a student member, has not change since my original decision. I tried to act in the most just and fair way possible and reflect the characteristics of a virtuous person in myself. I placed these virtues onto Mr Lawlor, to see if he was guilty of not being ‘a good person’. While having no formal set of rules, Aristotle described Virtue Theory as a principle that allows us to put our attention not on other people, on actions, or consequence but rather on focusing on being a ‘good person’.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays