According To Aristotle: The Best Way To Live A Good Life

Amazing Essays
Assignment 5: Long Paper 1
According to Aristotle, the best life to live is a life of pursuing knowledge. Not only pursuing it but understanding it too. Virtue is a very important aspect that one needs to consider when trying to live an all around good life. As a writer named Christine puts it:
Like others before him, such as Socrates and Plato, Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who was interested in the best way to live a good life and to cultivate virtue. In particular, he believed virtue to be something that a person not only needs to understand but that a person also needs to live out in their actual lives. (Scarince, Christine).
Most human activities shoot for something that is considered good. The highest good is something that you can easily determine by looking at its end purpose or goal. You could ask questions like: does it create happiness in and of itself? Or, does it need further action to make it a good thing? The things that we pursue for their own sake, nothing else, must be the highest or supreme Good.
…show more content…
This concept could definitely be true for animals, but human life aims at a higher end than animal life does. Even if there was one form of good that constituted happiness, our interest shouldn’t be in that, but more pointed to questions like: how can I be good? We should concern ourselves with ends we can pursue in normal, everyday human life.
A person is deemed “good” if they do what they are supposed to do and do it well. This is true in many aspects of human life and activities. The specific human activity that differentiates us from animals and plants is our ability to rationalize. In that case, the highest Good would be an activity that goes along with virtue. A person that is good will behave virtuously even if he or she is faced with death, famine, plague, sickness, or any other misfortune. A good person will behave in a good, virtuous manner, no matter what the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For me, morality and ethics are different but relevant to each other. Morality is the proper behaviour of a person in doing right or wrong things while ethics is the human standards to do good and bad actions. When we are doing morality and ethics we will feel happy because we are doing good things that people around us will not be hurt and it is for us to become happy in the future and to do these is our nature. For example, you want to be a successful person so in order to achieve the goal you want, you have to be patient and do good things simultaneously. According to Aristotle, “the purpose of ethics is to simply find the ultimate purpose of life of human person” It means that we act ethically to have the ultimate happiness and to know the purpose of our lives.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every capability and every action is a pursuit of some good. According to Aristotle, “Every craft and every line of inquiry and likewise every action and decision seems to seeks some good, that is why some people were right to describe the good as what everything seeks. But the ends that are sought appear to differ; some are activities, and others are products apart from the activities (Nicomachean Ethics, 1).” The goods that are sought out are the ends. Aristotle believed that an end was more complete if it was pursued for the sake of itself rather than for the sake of something else. He believed that happiness was the highest good for human beings.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical Theory Of Virtue

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The laudable character traits, the marks of greatness in character, are called virtues. “Virtue Theory maintains that our primary moral responsibility is to develop a virtuous personal character, a character full of virtues” (Burnor 219). Everyone is born with the potential of becoming virtuous, but it is according to their function and situation. We must be able to perform morally right acts with morally right intentions. In other words, we must act upon morally right situations because it is our intuition.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Aristotle links the concept of happiness and virtue in saying that the most important factor in the effort to achieve this sense of happiness is to have a good moral character. He goes on to say that one must have this sense of complete virtue, meaning that it is not enough to have a few virtues but instead one must strive to possess them all in order to achieve happiness in the end. He says, “The happy person is the one who expresses complete virtue in his activities, with an adequate supply of external goods, not for just anytime but for a complete life” (Nicomachean Ethics, 10101a15). This quote backs up Aristotle’s argument in that happiness consists of achieving these virtuous actions not just at certain points in one’s life but throughout one’s whole lifetime. Aristotle goes on to say that life requires us to make choices, and some of them bring us immediate pleasure while others require some sort of sacrifice to reach happiness.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant believes it 's the intention that dictates morality. He would argue that although your actions may cause more suffering in the end, your intentions were good and that is what mattered. Furthermore, he would support this because it supports his theory of the categorical imperative. Hypothetically, your maxim could be something along the lines of, "If an individual they have the ability to save a life, he or she should at least try because it 's his or her duty." This is a maxim that can be universalized.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Those individuals’ claims arise from that one can achieve a good life through moral values and considerations rather than monetary donations to the various organizations in society. That the “state of mind” significantly affects an individual’s ulterior actions, motives and “attitudes towards life.” Philosopher, Bertrand Russell’s reflection on the meaning of happiness compares “to an extraordinary extent the same as the good life,” and he profoundly believes that “one’s own happiness is bound up in its success.” One grasps happiness, according to Russell, when one’s state of mind and attitude towards life align and create a perfect harmony or “integration.” Morality and motives define who one is and what internally makes their life…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As rational beings, we need both intellectual and moral virtues through the practices of our lives’ experiences. Aristotle believed that as rational beings, our lives must have balance and moderation to the things we desire and need in our lives. Applying his virtue and ethics will allow anyone to develop the best possible version of yourself to acquire happiness and live off well. According to Aristotle, the supreme…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is all about promoting the "greatest amount of good,”. I believe that if one can indeed find pleasure while still being able to avoid pain, why not? Yes, there may be other underlying factors that may play…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us. Some strengths of utilitarianism include the importance of happiness, consideration of the greater good, and relevance of intention. Meanwhile, Some disadvantages of utilitarianism are that it is not the only thing of value and the end doesn't justify the means. Mill and Kant have opposite views points, Kant thinks people can decide what is moral through reason alone and Mill thinks that through experience people can determine what is good or evil based on pleasure and…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays