One possible explanation is that there are biological differences—in terms of inherent differences between men and women in cognitive and problem-solving abilities (Kimura, 1999; Byrnes, 2005; Baron-Cohen, 2003; Halpern et al., 2007). However, research on sex differences in brain structure and hormones is inconclusive in explaining women’s underachievement in math (Ceci et al, 2009). Other researchers state that some of the math achievement gender gap might be attributed to discriminatory resource allocation towards girls (Fryer and Levitt, 2010; Hannum et al., 2009). When families are poor, it is possible that they decide to invest scare resources in boys and not girls. It is also possible that in some cases, due to parental (or teacher) perceptions of differential labor market outcomes for girls and boys, boys are likely to gain more parental (or teacher) concern and educational investment (instructional effort) than girls especially in the areas of math and science (Hannum et al., 2009; Gaea et al.,
One possible explanation is that there are biological differences—in terms of inherent differences between men and women in cognitive and problem-solving abilities (Kimura, 1999; Byrnes, 2005; Baron-Cohen, 2003; Halpern et al., 2007). However, research on sex differences in brain structure and hormones is inconclusive in explaining women’s underachievement in math (Ceci et al, 2009). Other researchers state that some of the math achievement gender gap might be attributed to discriminatory resource allocation towards girls (Fryer and Levitt, 2010; Hannum et al., 2009). When families are poor, it is possible that they decide to invest scare resources in boys and not girls. It is also possible that in some cases, due to parental (or teacher) perceptions of differential labor market outcomes for girls and boys, boys are likely to gain more parental (or teacher) concern and educational investment (instructional effort) than girls especially in the areas of math and science (Hannum et al., 2009; Gaea et al.,