Summary and Response
In the article “The Facts about the Achievement Gap”, author Diane Ravitch shows that privatization in the United States education system is a direct response to the achievement gap between white students and minorities. She is a “researcher of education at New York University” (prologue), and once served “in the U.S. department of education from 1991 to 1993” (prologue). Her personal experience in the field of education has shown that “privatization inevitably means deregulation, greater segregation, and less equality” (361). Some major key points that challenge the achievement gap consist of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and socio-economics. Progress has been made towards closing the gap, but it still remains.
In the article “The Facts about the Achievement Gap”, author Diane Ravitch shows that privatization in the United States education system is a direct response to the achievement gap between white students and minorities. She is a “researcher of education at New York University” (prologue), and once served “in the U.S. department of education from 1991 to 1993” (prologue). Her personal experience in the field of education has shown that “privatization inevitably means deregulation, greater segregation, and less equality” (361). Some major key points that challenge the achievement gap consist of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and socio-economics. Progress has been made towards closing the gap, but it still remains.