However, this is not the case! While endorsing Cyril’s concept of the hypostatic union of Christ, Tanner paradoxically abnegates Cyril’s theopaschitic position. Tanner takes an explicitly non-kenotic approach to the incarnation of Christ. That is, God does not give up or sacrifice anything of God’s own in the incarnation. The hypostatic union is the process of divinity’s perfection of humanity in the person of Christ without any self-sacrifice to the divine nature. For this reason, the reader of Tanner faces a paradox in her Christological
However, this is not the case! While endorsing Cyril’s concept of the hypostatic union of Christ, Tanner paradoxically abnegates Cyril’s theopaschitic position. Tanner takes an explicitly non-kenotic approach to the incarnation of Christ. That is, God does not give up or sacrifice anything of God’s own in the incarnation. The hypostatic union is the process of divinity’s perfection of humanity in the person of Christ without any self-sacrifice to the divine nature. For this reason, the reader of Tanner faces a paradox in her Christological