Alexander Hamilton Stephens's The Cornerstone Speech: Slavery And The Constitution

Superior Essays
Slavery and the Constitution Alexander Hamilton Stephens was a congressman from Georgia and the former leader of the Whig party. He was one of the most important opponents of succession in the South, but he did later become vice president of the Confederacy. In “The Cornerstone Speech,” Alexander Hamilton Stephens discusses the foundation of the new nation that is to be formed. The new nation will be formed around the idea of slavery and Stephens openly states that slavery was the main cause that the succession of the South happened. Overall, Stephens hoped that his message would persuade some of the reaming slave states to succeed from the Union and join the Confederacy. The main claim that Alexander Hamilton Stephens is trying to make in …show more content…
The text says, “It is the first government ever instituted upon the principles in strict conformity to nature…” (92). He claims that the new government that is to be established is the first of its kind because it will be conformed to nature. The foundation for the government will fulfill this idea of conformity. The point that he is trying to make is that since the slaves were created by a deity and their purpose should not be questioned because if it was questioned it would break the rules of nature. He also discusses how other forms of government are violating the laws of nature and establishing the new government is one of the ways that the Confederacy can be conformed with the laws of nature since they are often looked down upon because of the use of …show more content…
Towards the end of the text, Stephens shows glimpses of how the new constitution might impact the future. According to Stephens, “…Our object is peace, not only with the North, but with the world” (95). The entire purpose of forming a new constitution is that peace will be reinforced. The South is constantly looked down upon from the abolitionist north because of the use of slaves in the production of raw materials. However, putting the issue of inequality at the forefront is believed to help resolve the issues between the two. Stephens even goes so far to say that the idea of war may become less threatening. One can see now that this idea was not effective. The North and the South eventually went to war and once the war ended there was still issues that each had to face. The idea of the South being in control of their future is a valid point. Events like the Dred Scott Decision and the Missouri Compromise created tension and ultimately these led to the Civil War and the South had some influence on the outcomes of many of these events. This is just one example of how the South was in control of their future. The repetition of the word “cornerstone” is used purposefully in order to Stephens to prove his point. A cornerstone forms the corner of a building and essentially joins two walls; it is the foundation. The foundation for the success in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    From Revolution to Ratification, concurred with Fillmore’s assessment, “In growing their government, the framers and their constituents created fundamental laws that sustained human bondage.” In the book, he laid forth several cogent arguments for the US Constitution being a pro-slavery document. He argued the document safe-guarded slavery through the three-fifths clause, the prolongation of the Atlantic slave trade, not allowing taxation on exports, and the fugitive slave clause. His analysis is accurate, Waldstreicher: Firstly,…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What was the primary function of the commissioners? Who appointed the first commissioners and why? The primary function of the commissioners was to convince the other slave states to join them in secession.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karuna Kayastha Professor Mathew Hinckley History 1301 07/06/2017 Cornerstone Speech Cornerstone speech also known as "Cornerstone Address" is the speech given by Alexander Stephen in Savannah Georgia on March 21, 1861. During the Civil war , he served as the Vice President of Confederate States of America. When was elected to the Confederate Congress, he deliberated the speech that announced about new government where he said that all races are not equal and the whites are always superior then the black people. He believed and insisted that the American Revolution was based on the premises of wrong fundamental foundation.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South Vs South Summary

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The South is a very interesting and good analysis book to read for anyone who is interested in history and for those who is studying or interested in the Civil War. It is also a great book for high school or college level students, but it is not an easy book for someone like me who didn’t grow up learning about it from an early age. Unless they have a prior knowledge about the Civil War history. The book is very deep with a lot of information and sometimes it is hard to understand everything that had happened during the Civil War, but it makes a very important contribution to our understanding of the Civil War and what leads to the to the Civil War. I cannot say the book answered all my questions, but I am left with the new insights which I am not familiar…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1776, the United States constitution was originally formed to create a sense of national unity, however, this concept soon serves as a source of conflict and tension for the U.S. and is what later leads to the failure and destruction of the nation in 1850-1861. The constitution continued to bring national unity well into the 1850’s, however disputes over slavery were beginning to become extremely apparent during 1850-1861. Although the constitution explicitly states that “All men are created equal,” it never directly addressed the issue of slavery, leaving it up for interpretation of the citizens, which is one of the main causes of the Civil War. The issue of slavery began to invade American politics and later resulted in the failure of the country. The map in Document A illustrates how the Compromise of 1850 impacted the United States and makes the lines of division amongst the country extremely noticeable (Doc.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The thought of Lincoln taking their slaves, despite his promise not to, led them to secession. In the years preceding the Civil War both sides were forced to concede points to avoid violence, but in the end, it only delayed the inevitable fighting and made those for and against slavery frustrated and ready to bear arms. As the country’s stakes on land increased in size so too did the stakes of the issue at hand. Gradually, as the year, 1860 approached Americans faced a matter that could not be left alone.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was a hotheaded congressman that was from South Carolina, he was called the Union of a “foul monster.” Majority of South Carolina’s population was mostly made up slaves. He and the Carolinians were living in the state. To end their slavery, the federal authorities would have to establish tariffs. Slavery was at stake, according to John C. Calhoun with the “peculiar domestic institutions of the southern states.”…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephens Talks about why the southern states secedes and create the confederacy. It seems that one of the reasons of why they did it is because of slavery. He talks about ideas that Jefferson and other leading political leaders of his time were wrong. That the ideas rested upon the assumption of equality of races, and that this was an error. This was talked about on the first page of the “Alexander H. Stephens, “cornerstone speech” .…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Union and Confederacy could not agree and the nation needed to be reunited. The popular belief that the constitution should remain unchanged and continue to reflect the framer’s Anglo-Saxon views of slavery made it a difficult…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He further explains his belief of the Civil War was not only because of states rights,…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: How did slavery affect politics between 1800 and 1860? This time era is the pre-civil war era in America. The tensions were quite high between these years only growing tighter. The North was doing all it could to stop the South and its expansion of slavery into the new western territories. The main political goal of the North was in fact to stop the expansion of slavery not abolish it from the South.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Perspectives

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The northern viewpoint was that the South was so vehemently against abolition that they seceded from the Union. In 1929, in an effort to get their story out and to inform future generations, a movement in the South created the Confederate Catechism, a document that did all it could to justify the South. It made such claims as slavery didn’t start the war but rather “the vindictive, intemperate anti-slavery movement that was at the bottom of all the troubles”, the South fought “…to repel invasion and for self-government, just as the fathers of the American Revolution had done”, and said that they would not have fought had “Lincoln not sent armies to the South” (Gardiner, Confederate Catechism). To the South the war was entirely started by the North infringing on state’s rights. In their mind they were every way in the right, and they continually denied the issue of slavery.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John C. Calhoun is widely known for his “positive good of slavery” speech. He argues that slavery isn’t immoral since he believed, “that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slave holding states between the two, is instead of an evil, a good-a positive good.” Many viewed slaveries as a depravity but Johns views were diverse since he didn’t see slavery as a flaw to American society. John had the mind set of convincing people that goodness is the only thing that came out of slavery since it helped America progress in many ways. Despite many people going against his speech,…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays