The Positive Good Of Slavery Speech By John C. Calhoun

1104 Words 5 Pages
John C. Calhoun is widely known for his “positive good of slavery” speech. He argues that slavery isn’t immoral since he believed, “that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slave holding states between the two, is instead of an evil, a good-a positive good.” Many viewed slaveries as a depravity but Johns views were diverse since he didn’t see slavery as a flaw to American society. John had the mind set of convincing people that goodness is the only thing that came out of slavery since it helped America progress in many ways. Despite many people going against his speech, …show more content…
John saw the petitions as a thriving abolition progress and wanted to disparage the people who wanted to bring an end to slavery. It concerned john that people were forming petitions and stated that, “the subject is beyond the jurisdiction of congress – they have no right to touch it an any shape or form, or to make it the subject of deliberation or discussion.” This gave him the thought to develop the speech, it involved john declaring a “positive good” that came out of slavery. This speech appalled many people since his opinions differed from others in a major way due to his ethical beliefs on slavery. John believed slavery didn’t have a negative effect on anyone since it was a good outcome for the north and south as well as both, whites and blacks benefiting from it. Not to mention, John also claimed that people within slavery lived a better life than the poor in Europe. Him stating this makes me believe he wanted to bribe them to stay slaves so if it came to terms and it were terminated they would have to live poorly and staying as a slave give them a better life to live. In a like manner, john also made it seem as if slavery was already a part of their daily lives and the way races were defined back then just couldn’t combine the two since they were both looked at differently. Additionally, during his speech he states …show more content…
After all, he wouldn’t have written the positive good speech if no one wanted to terminate slavery. John wanted to convince the people who were against his views to know why slavery improved America and that the race from central Africa had never been in this great condition before slavery came along and that if it they were to make two races equally then America wouldn’t be the same. He wanted to point out that the north and south both benefited from slavery in many ways. The north depended on the south for most of their goods and without them there would be no survival in the north. Not to mention, slavery is what made cash crops and kept the federal government going since it gave them revenue. There was no work force in the south that could be depended on because they would quit since they actually had a choice. This was one of the ways john tried to convince people, without slavery the north and south would both go down which worried many

Related Documents