The Positive Good Of Slavery Speech By John C. Calhoun

Improved Essays
John C. Calhoun is widely known for his “positive good of slavery” speech. He argues that slavery isn’t immoral since he believed, “that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slave holding states between the two, is instead of an evil, a good-a positive good.” Many viewed slaveries as a depravity but Johns views were diverse since he didn’t see slavery as a flaw to American society. John had the mind set of convincing people that goodness is the only thing that came out of slavery since it helped America progress in many ways. Despite many people going against his speech, …show more content…
John saw the petitions as a thriving abolition progress and wanted to disparage the people who wanted to bring an end to slavery. It concerned john that people were forming petitions and stated that, “the subject is beyond the jurisdiction of congress – they have no right to touch it an any shape or form, or to make it the subject of deliberation or discussion.” This gave him the thought to develop the speech, it involved john declaring a “positive good” that came out of slavery. This speech appalled many people since his opinions differed from others in a major way due to his ethical beliefs on slavery. John believed slavery didn’t have a negative effect on anyone since it was a good outcome for the north and south as well as both, whites and blacks benefiting from it. Not to mention, John also claimed that people within slavery lived a better life than the poor in Europe. Him stating this makes me believe he wanted to bribe them to stay slaves so if it came to terms and it were terminated they would have to live poorly and staying as a slave give them a better life to live. In a like manner, john also made it seem as if slavery was already a part of their daily lives and the way races were defined back then just couldn’t combine the two since they were both looked at differently. Additionally, during his speech he states …show more content…
After all, he wouldn’t have written the positive good speech if no one wanted to terminate slavery. John wanted to convince the people who were against his views to know why slavery improved America and that the race from central Africa had never been in this great condition before slavery came along and that if it they were to make two races equally then America wouldn’t be the same. He wanted to point out that the north and south both benefited from slavery in many ways. The north depended on the south for most of their goods and without them there would be no survival in the north. Not to mention, slavery is what made cash crops and kept the federal government going since it gave them revenue. There was no work force in the south that could be depended on because they would quit since they actually had a choice. This was one of the ways john tried to convince people, without slavery the north and south would both go down which worried many

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln did not really feel bad for the slaves. He showed little interest in the pain the blacks were going through, but he publicly expressed that slavery is morally evil. There is evidence to suggest that Lincoln was a racist, and he also has stated that he believes in a “White America.” Lincoln would often argue that the forefathers were against slavery, but they had to put up with because it already existed in American. Lincoln had the same mentality. He thought it was morally wrong and evil, but he had to put up with it because if the slaves were freed there would be a gigantic uproar, that would tear America apart.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society can advance in technology and in many other sectors of life however, if individuals in that society value gain, hatred and benefits over morals and humane thoughts then that society will eventually get dragged back down. The end of blacks being properties in America did not really mean freedom because deep down many Whiteman still did not recognize and admit that their hatred towards blacks was inhumane and morally wrong. This failure of recognition and acceptance eventually paved its way even into modern society where although blacks aren’t property many still dislike them and feel superior towards them. Abraham Lincoln’s help in ending slavery was important yet what’s even more important would been his valuing of blacks as humans not merely creatures. Actions are good yet morals, values and your attitude towards some is just as good as well.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Framers 3/5 Compromise

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While most of the elite owned some slaves, they did not agree with it. They could not see slavery being abolished because of how much it helped the economy. To keep the nation untied, they introduced compromises and acts to be passed by congress. The first of these being the 3/5 Compromise. The Framers had a perfect opportunity to end slavery while writing a new document to govern the people and states but they choose to avoid it.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Douglass believes the war could not have been prevented for two reasons. The first reason is that the birth of our nation began with a moral divide between the North and the South (414). Slavery is what divides the nation. The second reason is that no one stood up against slavery early enough to put it to an end. Even the great men in the government who knew what could happen if slavery was not ended did not try to abolish it.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The North had believed otherwise, that slavery was taking more jobs away from the whites and argued that slavery was hurting the economy rather than boosting it. The only people who did not profit off anything was the slaves working the free labor, the black population. The war began due to the struggle of trying to preserve the union, not the struggle of trying to free the slaves. Though the fight to free the slaves benefited black people all around America and derived from morals and ethic, they were not prioritized. Lincoln having a personal dislike of slavery, was willing to tolerate it in some states if it meant preserving the union.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson's conflicting views on the institution of slavery Historical Context and Background Thomas Jefferson would be regarded as the founding father for democracy. As the third president of the United States of America and a former vice president, he was very instrumental in drafting bills that championed for the rights of the people. However, by the time Thomas Jefferson was born, slavery had taken route in America and it was since hard for the Americans to do away with it. Slaves were preferred because they provided cheap labour and they were easily available for any manual work. The rich merchants were against the laws forbidding slavery because they knew they would incur losses during their harvesting.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To sum up, Abraham Lincoln claimed he was against slavery; however, most evidence shows that he benefited slavery. This is because Abraham Lincoln says that he felt like he was assigned to white people. Also, he didn’t want the two races to be united with one another. Plus, he didn’t free every slave; his thoughts on slavery showed that he didn’t want to do much for the US, besides show his opinions. Evidence shows that Abraham Lincoln benefited from slavery and wanted it to be continued.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Union Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though Lincoln though Slavery was wrong, he always trusted in white control. He said, “If slavery is not wrong, then nothing is wrong.” When the war started he only thought of it as saving the union. Abraham Lincoln has all the recognition for the freeing of the slaves and making peace in the world between blacks and…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Slavery Good Or Bad

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1619, slavery existed in every North American colony, however after the American Revolution the Northern states started to move away from slavery, while it prospered in the South. People in the North started to worry over the expansion of slavery as they believed it hindered the opportunities that America provided. As the discussion over slavery started becoming more prominent, slave advocates changed their claims from slavery being a “necessary evil” to a “positive good”. According to many white southerners, slavery was not only beneficial to the economy but it benefitting the slaves as well. Advocates claimed that African Americans were inferior to the white race and by bringing them to America as slaves and introducing them to Christianity…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One interesting way discussed was through the manumission papers. This was interesting because it legally freed the slaves; however, it did not guarantee that they would be regarded as citizens. This helps draw to the conclusion that obtaining true citizenship and liberties for slaves was a much more drawn out process than we realized and that some slave owners weren 't even necessarily advocates of slavery. They felt compelled to own slaves for other reasons than instead their own desire, such as wealth, status in society, and because it was "the thing to do" in that area, etc. Many men were willing to step out of the comfort zone and speak for the slaves because they could not speak for themselves.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays