The Con Side Of The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Some other factors that play into the con side of the death penalty include the fact that killing the offender does not always relieve suffering of the victims’ families or bring them closure. Also, due to long waits on death row, prisoners are essentially serving both a life and death sentence which some would argue is inhumane treatment. We also cannot forget that the death penalty may glorify prisoners and make them martyrs in the eyes of their supporters and could create a copy-cat effect. (Stearman, 2008, p.22)
Capital punishment is an intolerable denial of civil liberties, and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system. (Stearman, 2008, p.44) This could result in a more violent and less compassionate society
…show more content…
However, I doubt we can go back to public executions as a live spectator event. I do not think we will see “widespread vigilantism or mob lynching again” because America has “come to our present use of the death penalty through a historical learning curve.” (Steelwater, 2003, p.229)
Even after careful, objective analysis of the arguments for and against the death penalty in the way of deterrence, pros and cons, and public executions there is no clear answer to what is correct. This concept will probably always be in the eye of the beholder. There is no cookie cutter death penalty sentencing nor should there be. A battered wife who kills her husband after suffering years of abuse should not be treated the same as a psychopathic murderer who kills for the thrill of it. The only relevant question is: does the person to be executed deserve the punishment?
“When a life has been taken deliberately by the offender, we cannot say that the punishment is invariably disproportionate to the crime. It is an extreme sanction, suitable to the most extreme of crimes.” (Brenner, 2006, p.66) Since we are not able to establish strict guidelines on who receives the death penalty and who does not, there will always be heated debates surrounding the death penalty with no clear

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People executed or put on death row, in my opinion, are only put there as revenge for the victim. The execution is not justifying the convicted criminal’s actions, but rather the execution is only “retribution” for the crime they committed. When considering the survey in 2010, most people are against the death penalty, and even the families of the victim(s) say they would rather not have the pain and guilt of murdering another human being. If the family of a victim would rather have the criminal imprisoned, then why doesn’t the government feel the same way? There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is cause for many arguments. There are many people who are against it and many for it but it should come down to what is best for the society. The death penalty is a conviction that criminals get for committing heinous crimes. The problem with the death penalty is that it is permanent. Once someone is sentenced to the death penalty and is killed, their conviction cannot be overturned, if they are later found innocent.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents. The death penalty is a bad thing for inmates family because it's a reminder of what the government did to their loved one. When put on death row there is a risk of executing an innocent person.When DNA exonerations several that murder case are often riddled with problems. The problems are mistaken eyewitnesses, bad lawyers, shoddy forensics, unbridledly, jailhouse snitches etc. Ray…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Justified for Limited Reasons Capital Punishment is considered to be a controversial topic in the United States and will continue to be for many years. Surely some states do not agree with the death penalty, but there are certain types of murderers who should receive capital punishment. The death of numerous people at once or a killer who murders a large number of people at different times are considered to be heinous and should receive capital punishment. Murders involving a child or an elder is certainly not right either. Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we accidentally put to death the wrong person according to burns we should feel angry, and someone should pay for this innocent persons death. So, following Burns theory should the Judge, the jury, or the executioner be put to death for this innocent person, or should all of them be put to death? They all had their part in this innocents death, and had a choice to not do it, even if it was their job. According to Burns someone has to be held accountable for this persons death, so who should be choose? This is where burns theory falls apart, because I don’t think burns himself could even answer this question without making, some sort of loophole in his theory.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among the many moral dilemmas that the United States faces, the death penalty is one of the most controversial issues of our time period. Currently, there are thirty-two states who allow capital punishment, leaving eighteen states who have banned it (DPIC). Capital punishment is the legalized form of murdering a person without facing the consequences. It is very hypocritical of the United States to turn to murder as a form of serving justice for the supposed well-being of the citizens. The death penalty has proven not be a fair punishment in repeated occasions by depriving both sides of something cherished deeply.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment can be define as justified murder because we are taken a life for a life. The question of how societies respond to serious crimes has been an issue not only in our culture but other cultures. Like are society other society have had to live with murder so this is why life without parole is a positive alternative. If I were a person who had a father that was murder by someone and just knowing that I will never see my father again I will be for capital punishment because my father is gone and there is no way to bring him back. I would feel that the only right thing to do is to have that person executed because the alternative to capital punishment in this case would be life without parole which is in a way like killing the person but they are still living they just will never be free but it still won’t bring my dad back but it’s a solution it may not be the solution we were looking for because nothing can bring him back.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He points out that executor jobs are just as degrading and uncomfortable as any other job can be, and also makes a strong statement on how the death penalty is a way of catharsis that directly affected victims and communities get. These points are effective in favor for the death penalty. However, Mencken’s argument that death row prisoners, after running out of appeals, should not have to wait long terms of time until they are put to death is not reasonable. These murderers should be allowed to suffer alive during the long wait because of their horrible…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Against The Death Penalty

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My only question would be so does that mean that rapist should be raped and arsonist should have their house burned down? Some crimes are heinous and unimaginable, and it may warrant the highest punishment possible; when the evidence is substantial and overwhelming. Like the case of the notorious John Wayne Gacy rightfully received the death penalty, because there was no justice in keeping him behind bars where he would continue to have no remorse and possibility to ever be redeemed for his crimes. People seem to think someone like John Wayne Gacy did suffer in jail, and regretted what he did, however when he hid bodies of young boys and men in his home after he killed them he did show regret or remorse. We as society will never know because he was executed.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics