Is The Death Penalty Ethical?

Superior Essays
For many years capital punishment has been a talking point. It has been widely debated whether it is a humane practice or not. As a society through the years we have been split. There has always been a debate for both sides. Even in early times when the death penalty was widely accepted. There were naysayers to the way it was done. We also see the death penalty go as far back as ancient times. The bible states that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, rape, larceny, or burglary. Seeing this we realize that this debate is not a new issue. For most people this is simply a moral question. In some people 's minds the death penalty is a very fair and just system. For others they do not believe that it should be an eye for an eye. …show more content…
Ted Bundy had a good example of fear on death row. Bundy sat on death row for nine years. In that time he had no remorse as he sat in prison. Bundy and his lawyers used every single appeal they could to avert his death. He had interviews that he claimed pornography contributed to his conduct. He tried to get off death row by telling police where the bodies of the girls he killed were. Bundy never admitted to being a bad person while in prison. Right before Bundy was put to death he exclaimed he had done nothing wrong. It was very clear that he was scared to be put to death. Showing that he did not fear life in prison. He feared being put to death, but life in prison is what he wanted. This showing that in the time of the crime criminals are thinking of death. No one wants to be executed by the needle. Bundy and other criminals have no fear of life in prison. But a distinct fear of being put on a table to die. …show more content…
For the matter of a botched execution it was a fluke. In the studies that are shown botched executions are a one and one hundred happening. It is a tragedy that someone has to suffer, but it is not a norm. For the faThe counter argument to this topic has been much more widely broadcasted in the past few years. Mainly from the Democratic party, and left wing media outlets. They are the ones who say that the death penalty is not just. They cite examples of botched executions. Such as the execution of an inmate in Oklahoma. The reason that execution was botched was human error. The EMT who was placing the IV was struggling to find a vein. The inmate was on the table for an hour before he died. The ruling of death was a heart attack which is not how the inmate was suppose to go. The basis of this is that the EMT could not properly place an IV. The drugs worked the way they should it was human error. "Imposition of the death penalty is arbitrary and capricious. Decision of who will live and who will die for his crime turns less on the nature of the offense and the incorrigibility of the offender and more on inappropriate and indefensible considerations: the political and personal inclinations of prosecutors; the defendant 's wealth, race and intellect; the race and economic status of the victim; the quality of the defendant 's counsel; and the resources allocated to defense lawyers." -Gerald Heaney, former appellate judge (Student).

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People executed or put on death row, in my opinion, are only put there as revenge for the victim. The execution is not justifying the convicted criminal’s actions, but rather the execution is only “retribution” for the crime they committed. When considering the survey in 2010, most people are against the death penalty, and even the families of the victim(s) say they would rather not have the pain and guilt of murdering another human being. If the family of a victim would rather have the criminal imprisoned, then why doesn’t the government feel the same way? There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many death row cases are based on eyewitness information, because the case lacks leads from other sources, which leaves the prosecutors to relay on the eyewitness, as described in the innocent execution of Carlos Luna (10 Convicts Presumed Innocent After Execution, 2010). Senator Raymond Lesniak explains in his speech at the International Human Rights Competition that revenge will only open the door to evil and redemption will bring out the peace by forgiveness, the following quote is from his speech, “The need for revenge leads to hate and violence. Redemption opens the door to healing and peace. Revenge slams it shut” (Lesniak). It is undeniably hard to imagine why people are for the death…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280) the court ruled that a mandatory death sentencing is unconstitutional, this case was also ruled as being disproportionate. It seems as though it wanted to promote and increase the number of executions. The act goes against religion, in many religions execution is an immoral act; this is another way that the death penalty is in violation of the constitution. The mentally ill is executed, in Atkins v. Virginia, Atkins was convicted of armed robbery, and capital murder. However due to his mental issues and being diagnosed with mental retardation, his case was affirmed and he was sentenced to life in prison instead.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay! It is unavoidably evident, that ethnic discrimination racial bias, apartheid, is all a part of the administration of capital punishment in America. (Bedau, Cassell) This is saying that racism in Capital Punishment is unavoidable, no matter what in this world today the minorities and poor won’t ever get the benefit of the doubt. It means that even though racism happens right in front of people they act as nothing happens. This help proves how inhumane this country in the way it is running.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is convicted and sentenced to prison for life. While he is guilty of a terrible crime, taking another person’s life, it was not premeditated and, therefore, not the most extreme form of murder, so it could not necessarily warrant the most extreme form of punishment, the death penalty. (The death penalty cannot be reversed once the execution is completed, so it is the most extreme form of punishment.) However, suppose while serving his sentence in prison, this man grows angry and builds up so much rage that eventually, after actual planning, he goes on to murder one of the guards or another inmate. This crime would be more extreme than the initial one for two reasons.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is destroying the sanctity of the United States Justice system as we know it. The most common form of carrying out the death penalty is ineffective, the whole process of the death penalty is expensive and lengthy, and people simply don’t want it anymore. It is a barbaric way of treating criminals and is more of a burden than a benefit. There are other ways to treat terrible criminals that would keep them isolated and with no chance of escaping. The death penalty, as in any case, is determined by the judge and jury.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a man with a mental illness thinks about killing every day, he should have been in a mental institution for his own safety and the safety of others. Having Holmes commit this crime led him to have a social stigma. His criminal record and mental illness led people to change their behavior toward him. You could consider Holmes as a deviant from Merton’s strain theory. He could be labeled as a retreatist, since he rejected the goals and means of life and lived outside the norm, while not participating in society.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is ineffective in the process it takes to punish criminals and in the ways it makes society safer. The punishment is for those who have been deemed unfit to live due to their crimes. An interesting case involved Alvin Ford, who was believed to be mentally ill, was sentenced to death for…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays