Death Penalty Controversy: Sentenced To Capital Punishment

Improved Essays
Sentenced

Sentenced to death. Many criminals in our country receive the controversial sentencing of the capital punishment. While the argument can go both directions, In the United states the death penalty should be abolished because it is a violation of the constitution, is a waste of time and lacks deterrence. The death penalty is in many opinions a violation of the constitution. According to recent studies by Justice Breyer, “The death penalty involves 3 fundamental defects. 1. Serious unreliability 2. Arbitrariness in application and, 3. Unconscionably long delays.” (Breyer). This proves that the death penalty provides no relationship to the constitution. Richard Wolf and Kevin Johnson state, “Of all the arguments against the capital
…show more content…
In quotation of Heyns and Mendez, “Studies found no empirical support for the argument that the existence or application of the death penalty deters prospective offenders from committing homicide.” (Heyns). On the other side of this argument, and with reference to the article written by Jacoby, Jeff. “When a murder is punished with nothing worse than prison more criminals will be emboldened to kill.” Well, Mr. Jacoby is incorrect in his statement and here is why. Many criminals on death row are glad they are on death row due to the reasoning with which they are able to receive freedom through death. Wouldn’t anyone who would otherwise spend their entire life in prison, want the freedom of leaving this world? Because they are, in fact, free from prison when they pass away. So, avoiding this situation completely; if a criminal is punished for a crime they committed, they should spend the rest of their natural lives wasting away in prison. Also proving Mr. Jacoby incorrect, is his own words, “The death penalty does not make our communities any safer and is not a deterrent to crime.” (Jacoby). The death penalty is not a deterrent to crime, and it never will be, “…criminality is not a synonym for stupidity” (Jacoby.) and any criminals know when they commit crimes that if they get caught they will be punished. It doesn’t necessarily matter the punishment; the crimes will still

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    “I see no alternative but to conclude that capital punishment cannot be justified on the basis of its deterrent effect” (Marshall,1972). Proving that is really is not a deterrence. Although one example of where capital punishment could be seen as an effective possible deterrent would be in The District of Columbia which has no death penalty has a very high rate of homicides. There are other deterrents to crime other than Capital Punishment, there is incarceration, fines, moral prohibitions and many others. One study, found that the elevated levels of assurance of arrest on crime lowered the burglary rate in Canada (Zedlewski, 1983).…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On April 18, 2012 a report was released by the National Research Council of the National Academies, it reviewed over three decades worth of work simply stating that deterrence on murder rates from the death penalty are just too flawed. Too many factors are involved to actually tell if the death penalty even makes a change. There is no way to actually tell, yet daily crimes are being committed and even though everyone is aware of what could happen if one…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment, is it an act of inhumanism or the perfect amount of justice for victims of even more server inhuman crimes? Capital punishment has been stated to be a controversy dating back to the eighteenth century when it began. Even though capital punishment is considered to be inhuman by society and various government officials it is not unconstitutional and does not violate the eighth amendment which states “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Excessive bail would be the act of the jury setting an outlandish amount for the bail of a criminal , if a person commits a heinous crime such as murder,federal murder,large scale drug trafficking,treason, terrorism,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As John Morrison exclaimed,“It should be clear that the death penalty does just the opposite of promoting decency and respect for life... It can never be applied fairly.” Since the mid nineteenth century, inmates on death row have been murdered by a plethora of gruesome methods, such as venomous lethal injections, gas chambers, and electrocution. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 1,413 executions in the United States from 1976 to the present. Although the number of death penalty verdicts are decreasing, flaws in the American judicial system have caused an increase in the amount of punishing wrongfully accused suspects to the death penalty.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are several that believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrence for committing a capital offense creating a safer environment. There are studies that show its effectiveness in deterring crime, but as a whole it is yet to find a deterrent effect in statistical evidence. Most sociopath or psychopath deviant willing to kill believe they will not be caught and are untroubled by the death penalty. Victim's families are entitled to the desire of wanting the perpetrator to suffer the ultimate consequence.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (qtd.in"Top 10 Pros and Cons") Is there any factual evidence to support this, though? With the data of around 3,000 counties, Emory Professors, Hashem Dezhbakhsh, Paul H. Rubin, and Joanna M. Shepherd concluded that for every execution, there were 18 less murders from 1977 to 1996. (Muhlhausen) How they came to this conclusion is unclear. In the write-up of their experiment, ‘Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrence Effect? New Evidence from Post-moratorium Panel Data’, it is merely stated that they “[examined] the deterrent effect of capital punishment using a system of simultaneous equations and county-level panel data that cover the post-moratorium period” without a clear explanation of how that worked.…

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I ask myself if the Death Penalty was effective in deterring crime. I read about the crime rates, the psychological mindset of the unfortunate people that are in the wrong place at the wrong time, and on impulse make choices that put them in the situation of being tried as one of the premeditated killers. There are inconclusive reports of religious or moral convictions that add fuel to the controversial issue. Considering all the facts, I believe that the death penalty should be available for our legal system. This penalty would hold the criminals who commit the extreme crimes accountable for their actions.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However; the death penalty doesn’t deters crimes because criminals no matter what their punishments are, will always commit horrible crimes. There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. It has been proven that states with death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. The death penalty has no deterrent effect. Huffington Post informed us that from 1993 to 2004, more than thirty-five percent of death row inmates were spared from capital punishment, but remained incarcerated, the study said.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment and Ethical Theories. Many people in the United States have opposing views on Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty. The death penalty is the process in which, convicted criminals are executed by a governing authority. Many other countries have abolished capital punishment but the United States still allows for this to happen in certain states. The death penalty is used for most terrible crimes such as murder, treason, or espionage but mainly for murder.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Defense of Injustice Capital punishment is defined as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. However, the death penalty is nothing new to human civilization. One of its earliest appearances in society is in Babylonian circa 1750 BC in the Code of Hammurabi (Flinn). Over time, human morals have changed giving countries such as Venezuela, San Marino, and Costa Rica insight to be the first countries to illegalize the death penalty (Sheldon).…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics