Terri Shiavo

Superior Essays
Analysis of “The Schiavos” and “Fetal Testing for Down Syndrome”
Terri Schiavo was a young woman in a persistent vegetative state (PSV) for nearly 13 years. Her husband fought to have her feeding tube removed to allow her to die naturally, yet her family contested his fight, claiming that Terri responded and interacted with them. Although her autopsy results confirmed what her husband argued. Terri suffered from blindness, and the inability to communicate, or interact. Yet her family continued to contest that she interacted with them, (Schiavo Autopsy). Terri’s case involved the application of passive, involuntary euthanasia by allowing her natural death after the cessation of her tube feedings. I will evaluate these cases using Utilitarianism, Kantian Deontology, and Natural
…show more content…
Thus for me, this utilitarian position is the best option as long as it is not used against the will of the patient. That is why it is imperative to consider the creation of Living Wills to make needs and wants clearly known. The application of the three discussed theories to abortion, however, indicate that the parents do not consider the greatest outcome of the child in the womb and its chances of a positive, fulfilling life. The greater value in this case considers the parents, and not the child. Kant’s belief that persons must act out of duty to preserve our lives makes the most sense to me as abortion goes against the rights of the fetus without giving that fetus a chance at a natural, contented

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Abortion Essay Rough Draft One half of pregnancies among American women are unintended, and four in ten of these are terminated by abortion. Abortion is a widely debated issue today, with many legal, social, and political implications. This essay discusses the ethical issues of abortion, up until the first trimester, more specifically who should be allowed to have one, whether or not the fetus has rights, the government’s place in abortion, and the level of access of abortion. Abortion should continue to be legal and readily available, and decisions made about it should be left between woman and her doctor. Abortion has been used to control reproduction throughout history.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There was a question of whether Mills was aware and conscious of the suffering during this time, and evidently, was given a round of unsuccessful pain-killers and anesthetics to prevent the continuation of this apparent suffering. At 2:52 pm, Dr. Morrison entered his room and injected a lethal dose of potassium chloride, instantly killing him. In 1997, Nancy Morrison was charged with first-degree murder, but then was let off and reprimanded instead due to the uncertainty of what truly caused Paul Mills’ death. Ultimately, this case is questioning whether or not Dr. Morrison inherently committed murder through non-voluntary active euthanasia or whether she voluntarily committed active euthanasia. First off, Utilitarian logic is aimed at analyzing the costs and benefits of the action.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction The case of Terri Schiavo brought attention to the debate over the right-to-die. On both sides of the debate, people from around the world, including the Vatican, weighed in with their opinion and viewpoints. There was no correct answer and no easy answer about if Terri Schiavo should live, with the requirements of extensive long-term care, or if she should die, presuming her informal conversation she had with Michael Schiavo about life-saving and prolonging were enough to make the decision final. This research paper will review how Terri Schiavo, Michael Schiavo, the Schindlers, the international attention and the State of Florida statutes played a role in a landmark decision involving Terri Schiavo’s end-of-life decision.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rosalind Hursthouse first sates in her essay “Virtue Theory and Abortion” the rules of the Virtue Theory and then applies it on how a virtue theorist would approach abortion. She explains the premises of virtue theory and how an action is only right if it is something a virtuous person would do. She then talks about how a person should only act if they truly understand what a virtuous person would do and not act on morals that are those considered by deontologists since those define something as morally right in accordance to moral laws but a virtuous person does not follow moral laws, they are that because their character leads them to doing the right thing and to promote the wellbeing of human life. Under the consideration of the virtue theory for abortion, the life of the fetus and the rights of the mother are both thrown out by virtue theory and are considered irreverent.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Prenatal genetic sequencing is a scientific procedure that predicts the risk of developing an illness later in life, and/or shows potential traits such as athleticism and intelligence in an unborn child. These predictions of illness and potential traits come from analyzing fetal DNA found in a sample of the mother’s blood. A very important and main concern for prenatal genetic testing is for preparation of treatment for a predicted illness in a child. Also parents are often interested in these predictions simply for having an indication of what they are getting themselves into. Prenatal genetic testing is a rising topic in present ethical conflicts.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The working principle of relativism looks at moral absolutes which can be abandoned dependent on the situation. Fletcher turns his back on the deontological approach such as Kant’s who alternatively argues that these moral absolutes should be obeyed at all times as it is our duty to do so. Although they both come from a christian perspective there views contrast, on one hand Kant tell us that we just know these moral absolutes it is are moral duty to follow them, which is duty god has given us. Furthermore Kant tell us we look to our conscience is moral dilemmas, and use the voice god. However Fletcher disregard this arguing that the only moral absolutes is to “love thy neighbour as thyself.”…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An analysis over the morality of abortion and infanticide reveals the arguments to whether there are practical lines or supported research that give the fetus the same protection that we grant a living child. Throughout the paper, the arguments from the Conservative, Liberal, and Peter Singer’s ethical view will be present. To begin, a utilitarian is someone moralist, who believes that the value of a thing or subject depends on utility or usefulness to a higher pleasure. Singer’s view on human life is more utilitarian due to him being against human rights. Human rights definition is to give equality to all genders, races, religion, origin, or any other status.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Westwig David Denby Intro to Ethics 15 December 2017 The Fundamental Problem of a Right to Life Abortion remains one of the flagship intractable problems in modern ethical theory. Numerous philosophers have attempted to apply existing theories to the moral question of abortion, and have used their results to invent and refine new theories. Mary Warren and Don Marquis, ethical philosophers and writers, embody the views of the two conflicting approaches. Warren takes a highly permissive stance on abortion, arguing that abortion should be permitted at any point during pregnancy, while Marquis claims that abortion, in general, is wrong, barring exceptional circumstances.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Philosophy and Abortion Argument Abortion has been a highly debated topic in today 's society. It is something that happens everyday. It is wrong to terminate a pregnancy before childbirth. Abortion causes unfair death. Abortion in general is wrong.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays