In “Bigger Monsters Weaker Chains” by Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt, are arguing that the United States has increased its methods of surveillance with new technology advances and we need new privacy laws. Some concerns are video surveillance, data surveillance, government surveillance, and communications surveillance. There has been an increase in video surveillance since 9/11. Cameras are not just in important public places like the Statue of Liberty or the National Mall but also in the streets.…
First of all, the retailers use the surveillance cameras as effective tools to track the customers’ behaviors and make people happy by providing what they need or expect. According to the article “Should Stores Be Allowed to Spy on You?” the author discusses how the surveillance videos can help retailers to keep a close eye on everything going on in the store. By placing cameras throughout the store, they can carefully watch their customers how long they spend shopping and what they are looking for. The surveillance cameras can catch the customer’s actions…
Therefore, he is an expert in this field and has much experience dealing with cases regarding the consequences of police brutality due to the government not implementing body cameras. In addition, the author provides a reason to believe by uniquely expressing his viewpoint and boldly stating his opinion on the effect of body cameras on police officers and citizens. O’Mara states, “People act better when they know they're being watched -- or recorded. Cops act better, and the people they encounter on the street are more cooperative.” O’Mara references a studied commissioned by the Police Foundation in 2012 that displays statistical evidence proving few force incidents with body cameras.…
With today’s technology, there is a rift between technology and personal privacy. Currently, no precise federal law prohibits surveillance cameras, but there is a fear with common-law confidentiality rights, which frequently leads to an evaluation of a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy. " Expectation of privacy is not an issue when overt cameras are used. A person’s expectation of privacy is also not void when on public campuses, such as Grand Valley. Surveillance cameras in public locations such as sidewalks or parking lots are no problem because there is not an expectation of privacy in such areas.…
Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy Introduction The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns with the surveillance of people within the United States. It all started while the collection of allegedly foreign intelligence by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) was going on as part of the war on terror. The National Security Agency is one of America's largest intelligence organizations. It is similar to the FBI and CIA.…
Policemen wearing body cameras would prevent violence. Why do I say this you ask? If a policeman is wearing a body camera and the suspect knows that the officer has one on, they would be cautious and realize they could be caught on camera. It'd be easier to find the suspect and who did the crime since it's on camera also. Suspects would most definitely be aware of their actions considering that they could be caught on camera.…
Technology is becoming so advanced in today’s society. Officers are starting to wear body cameras to record what takes place on duty. In a piece written for The New Yorker, Veronica Majerol has written about the use of theses cameras and if they will benefit today’s society. Many say this will help from the police not obeying citizens rights, while other believe this will raise a concern for privacy. There is no question that something needs to be done, and theses cameras will give the public truth on what is going on.…
With all the police brutality claims now there is so much controversy over police officers wearing body cameras. Some people feel that the officers should wear the cameras so that there will be a video of everything happening and there will be proof of what is going on between the officers and the civilians. Other people do not want the cameras because it violates people’s privacy. This has been an ongoing debate for a while now. In this essay I want to show some of the benefits for the body cameras.…
Body cameras will survey police behavior, thereby minimizing any inappropriate decisions. For example, in 2012, the city of Rialto outfitted all 70 of their uniformed police officers with cameras. This later on lead to an 88% reduction in public complaints against officers, and a 60% decline in officers’ use of force. This shows that police officers will act completely different and will watch their actions when they know that they are being recorded. People act differently when they know they are being watched because the presence of others encourages them to do the ‘right’ thing in order to gain social approval.…
Secondly, with the understanding of how Foucault’s impressions and theories about the contemporary politics of surveillance and how we live in a society where discipline is the mechanism of power being the factor of regulating our behaviours to an ethical extent. We will see the applications of modern surveillance technologies and how they influence the behaviours of individuals encouraging law abiding activities and discouraging politically incorrect activities. There are three main contemporary surveillance mechanisms that serve society fundamentally being, body-worn camera and correctional facilities. The first mechanism we will look in detail will be police body cameras. This surveillance mechanism serves the purpose to record interactions…
Police body cameras could potentially eliminate police brutality, create a nation-wide sense of comfort and security, and create self-promotion opportunity for police officers. But, are these expectations of safeguarding realistic? Storing and analyzing the footage, alone, is an obstacle that creates issue with the body cameras, but on top of that, there are privacy policy conflictions, both for the police officers and civilians, and, as proven in the past, footage of police brutality may not bring justice to victims and their families (“Police Body Cameras”). Although the idea of having everything filmed seems like an easy solution to police superiority, implementing the cameras is not as simple as publically assumed.…
The cameras will create a state of awareness which will make a person think twice before committing a crime…
The issue of invasion of privacy, especially in the different methods employed to ensure safety, affect innocent people and are sometimes not even effective. This issue is addressed in “Trading Liberty” by Wendy Kaminer, which was published in The Free Inquiry in 2002 after the 9/11 events. Kaminer, other than having written several books is also a lawyer. On the other hand, the issue is also acknowledge in the article, “If Looks Could Kill” written by The Economist, which is a weekly magazine in which most authors are anonymous. Still, it is widely recognized for its perspective in economic issues, current affairs, technology, etc.…
Police are constantly evolving, but certain advancements are infringing upon Americans Constitutional rights. In “Precognitive Police” by Henrick Karoliszyn, current police procedures are evaluated for their usefulness in today’s society. The entire article is indecisive. Karoliszyn starts the paper with strong evidence as to how these procedures are beneficial for society. He ends it, however, with contradictory information that causes the reader to be confused as to which way Karoliszyn stands.…