Surrogate Court Case

Improved Essays
Upon the death of an individual, the County Surrogates Court must validate ones Will and/or trust in order to satisfy all legal matters. A will is a written document, which takes effect upon death. Currently, all courts require a will to be typed in proper legal language. It is very rare for a court to accept a hand written will into probate. A will that is entirely handwritten and signed by the testator is referred to as a “holographic will”. It generally states ones last wishes and it is the job of the courts to make sure that those wishes are carried out accordingly. Prior to any action being taken on interpreting the will, the will must be proposed to the Surrogates Court for validation. The process of validating the will of a decedent …show more content…
Any material added/removed after the signatures is invalid. If the testator cannot sign his own will due to a physical incapability, he may either sign with an “X” or even have somebody else sign the name for him. The signing of a will must consist of at-least 2 attesting witnesses, the testator not being one of them. The testator must have asked the witnesses to sign at his own discretion and they must agree with no coercion. The witnesses must be aware that what they are signing is in-fact the testators will, however they do not need to know what the will consists of. The witnesses must sign within a 30-day period of each other otherwise their signatures will be invalid.
Undue influence and coercion are very common grounds for the denial of probate. Influence is considered “undue” if it results in coercion that affects the testator’s ability to act independently. Undue influence results in a will that ultimately is the product of another person’s desires. Undue influence comes in wide variety of forms, from bribery, to threats. Often, the case of undue influence arises from one family member influencing
…show more content…
Real property is usually transferred through “operation of law”. When a couple is married and they purchase a house together, that house is now known as a “joint tenant”. Both the husband and the wife each have equal ownership rights to that property. The husband can not state in his will that when he dies, he wants his half of the house sold and given to a friend. If there is no valid will, real property vests in the distributees of the estate at the time of the death. A spouse cannot give a house/part of a house away if it is held by tenants in the entirety. Tenants in the entirety” can only be held between a husband and a wife, and ach party has the right to survivorship over the property. Tenants in the entirety cannot be legally terminated unless both parties consent to do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bob And Carl Case

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The acceptance cannot be revoked regardless of whether notification of revocation is delivered using a more direct method of communication. Posting of acceptance ultimately results in the formation of a contract and as such the offeree cannot unilaterally withdraw, without the agreement of the offeror. This view is represented by the case of Wenkheim v Arndt. If this approach is taken the acceptance cannot be revoked particularly since Carl was uninformed of Bob’s intention to withdraw, because he had ignored the message left on his messaging system. The second approach states that no contract is formed because the offeree has rejected the contract in the first formal communication with the offeror, although the acceptance letter was posted.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contract will not stand, unless the parties intend to enter into a legal relationship and be legally bound by it. For example Wakeling v Ripley [1951] 51 SR (NSW) 183, Mr Ripley promised to transfer his properties to his sister and her spouse after he died and would provide accommodation there until then. After one year, the parties quarrelled, Mr Ripley sold his house and changed his will. Mr and Mrs Wakeling sued for breach of contract. The court ruled that in the circumstances in this case clearly showed that the parties were serious about their agreement and that they intended it to be legally binding.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Indeed, the parol evidence rule is a device that prevents the legal questions involving the interpretation of contracts from digressing into factual inquires into the subjective intent of the parties. Accordingly, we generally will not permit a litigant to vary the terms of a completely integrated agreement through the admission of extrinsic evidence. Although extrinsic evidence cannot be admitted to add of modify the terms of an integrated agreement, extrinsic evidence can be relied upon to serve other purposes. For example, “[a]ll courts generally agree that parol evidence is admissible when the written words are sufficiently ambiguous.” Calomiris v. Woods, 353 Md. 425, 433 (1999).…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    4. Limitations 4.1 Conditions to be Fulfilled One must be warned that even when an incorporation clause is being identified as a clause in the reference document, it does not inevitably follow that that clause will be incorporated into the reinsurance contract. The clause could be entirely inapplicable in the reinsurance contract. Due to this, the courts have developed rules that have to be met, so as to ensure that only appropriate and applicable terms are incorporated into reinsurance contracts. As explained by Thomas (2015, p. 46), “In HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd v New Hampshire Insurance Co [2001] 1 Lloyd’s Rep IR 224, the judge at first instance set out various tests that had to be satisfied before a term would be incorporated…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exclusion Clauses could consist of signed or unsigned documents. In terms of signed documents, a person who hasn’t read the contract and signs it Is bound by the exclusion to follow it. While an unsigned document which is the James Chung case, the exclusion clause will be only binding if they are brought to notice of buyer but notice must be reasonable. If talking about unsigned documents, court may opt for an objective test to check if the notice is reasonable or not. In some cases, the exclusion clause will not be treated valud, if the seller is misrepresenting the scope of the clause.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legal Law Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is because a third party may contract a person otherwise under an existing legal duty to do the act so required. Usain is not an agent of Brie as he was given no authority to act on her behalf and was not purporting to, and is therefore a third party. 3. Certainty The contract is sufficiently certain as the essential terms including price are given. No party has discretion as to performance, and it is sufficiently clear for the courts to enforce.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In compliance with federal law, Towson University must preserve all electronic data relevant to this litigation. There is action needed by you to fulfill Towson’s legal obligation: Once this notice is issued, any electronic data that is or may potentially be related to this litigation may not be modified, altered, or deleted until further notice. The individual department in which the subsequent information is stored, will suspend its retention and disposal of records policy for an infinite amount of time. This includes, recycling policies, automatic deletion functions, and the University of Maryland Records Schedule procedures. The university archives in Cook Library maintains a small variety of university records that pertains to the university’s publicity.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this case, Boland does not operate for B and J because they are both trustees, however, does for T since she is a beneficiary. Boland only works for someone who is a beneficiary, but not a trustee. BL As T knew about the mortgage for BL, then YMM may be able to claim a defence on the basis that T had implicitly consented to the mortgage. Lord Oliver also explained that occupation requires ‘some degree of permanence and continuity which would rule out mere fleeting presence.’ T was no in AO of BL at the time she agreed to the mortgage and therefore cannot claim AO as an OI. In this case, YMM has priority over T’s interests and can…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the commissioning couple own the sperm and eggs, they do not own the embryos and subsequently children made from them (McLachlan and Swales 2000: 3). Supporters of commercial surrogacy insist that parental rights are not property rights. As an illustration, take the example of selling a home. When selling this property, money would flow from the buyer to seller and there would be a corresponding transfer of legal rights. This would establish the ownership of the house from one to the other.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indoor management rule is generally related to the law principles of agency. In this rule, a company may apply replaceable rules even though is already has constitution so a company is able to use both. Connected to Turquand's case that an agent does not need to ask prescription that had been passed. They are innocent parties because they are not in the point to understand some internal rule has not been complied with. A person is eligible to assume that the company's internal operations have been accomplished with.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays