Life-Saving Medical Treatment: Case Study

Improved Essays
Sem 2 # Writing Assignment : Skills & Values Exercise 8.1
A BILL
AN ACT concerning
A Right to Refuse Life-Saving Medical Treatment

WHEREAS, the individual right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is guaranteed by the substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

WHEREAS, the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the citizen’s life, preventing suicide, and safeguarding the family members’ and loved ones’ interest in a person’s life.

WHEREAS, the state has a legitimate interest in ensuring the integrity of the medical professionals and their commitment to serving for the patient’s best interest.

WHEREAS, the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the citizens against abuse and undue influence by the third party, therefore

BE IT ENACTED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE HERE ASSEMBLED THAT:
Section 1: A terminally ill person shall be able to exercise his right to remove life-saving systems, including but not limited to life-sustaining hydration and nutrition measures, or cease
…show more content…
The state must carefully examine the evidence presented by the surrogate to safeguard the principal’s intent to terminate such treatments, and that his intent is reasonably believed to be true to the faith of that person at the time of the surrogate’s decision.

Section 4: The surrogate can show oral and/or written statements that reasonably support the principal’s wish to terminate medical treatments under the certain circumstances, along with the time frame in which the statements were given, his mental state, and other life events experienced by the principal that should be considered. Testimonies by family members and/or close friends, diaries, other traits of the principal may qualify if they are well recognized and appreciated by those who know the principal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kansas Vs Crane Case Study

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Content of Litigation Plaintiff: Argued the New York ban violates the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause by allowing ill adults to end their own lives. Also brought up the point that there was no direct distinguished difference between the two ways. Defendant: Defended the ban stating that it prolonged the lifespan of the patients and it was valid as it had important public interest that satisfied the constitutional requirements. III.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Theresia Schiavo Case

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The case primary issue surround the Theresia Schiavo was well articulated by Wolfson (Wolfson, 2006). Ms. Schiavo did not have a healthcare decision surrogate and did not have a living will that articulated he wishes surrounding end of life care. In other cases, where substitutes decision making is sound if based on the known desires of the patient (Pozgar, 2016, p. 416). In other cases, courts, have refused to stop medical treatment because the wish of the incompetent patient is un clear (Pozgar, 2016, p. 417). The rights of the patient to allow or refuse treatment are paramount in end of life decisions.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This short case study has a significant range of legal and ethical principles which contribute to the outcome of the outcome if Marion will continue or abandon treatment. The team who is treating Marion must refer to the Advance Care Directive and ensure they follow this carefully to ensure Marion’s best wishes. This is because an Advance Care Directive is a legal form for adults over the age of 18, in scenarios in which a person has impaired decision-making capacity, the Advance Care Directive will have instructions, vales and wishes for future health care (Advance Care Directives 2014). Marion’s parents state that she has an Advance Care Directive however, the treating team are unable to take their word and must obtain a copy to ensure the information is correct.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case name: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL v. ROBERT P. CASEY, ET AL. Court: Supreme Court of the United States Year of Decision: 1992 Facts: This was a United States Supreme Court case in which the statutory provisions of Pennsylvania regarding abortion was challenged. It required that a married woman seeking an abortion must inform and get consent from her spouse, a 24 hour waiting period, and required consent from at least one parent of a minor seeking an abortion. The parties of this case are Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, ET AL v. Robert P. Casey, ET AL.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia also known as Physician-Assisted Suicide, is only legal in four states. The word Euthanasia is translated from the Greek as “Good Death”. Physician-Assisted suicide kills a person within six months of their illness, upon the person request. In these four states it costs to prescribe a lethal prescription that is diagnosed based upon their terminal illness. Other states believe that Euthanasia is another form of manslaughter.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cruzan V. Missouri Dhs Case Study

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    The Cruzan family won the right to remove Nancy from life sustaining machines and feeding tubes. " Last spring (1996) Ninth Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote a fire breathing opinion to overturn Washington's Assisted-Suicide Ban on behalf of three plaintiffs who had already died naturally. Choosing a dignified death, Reinhardt asserted was a Constitutional Right under the 14th Amendment's Due Process Protection of Personal Liberties and the Principal of Privacy defined in the Court's abortion rulings. ' A competent terminally ill adult' should not be forced to endure 'a childlike state of helplessness, diapered, sedated, incompetent'" (Van Biema…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When discussing the topic of Physician Assisted Suicide, the main issue is debating whether or not it should be legalized in every state. Physician Assisted Suicide also known as (PAS) means a terminally ill patient requests a lethal dosage of medication, provided by a physician, intending to end his or her life. People who do not have the chance of a long term survival should have the right to decide if they want to continue living with their condition. However, there are some people that are convinced assisted suicide may be considered as self-murder.. According to the article “Why We Shouldn’t Legalize Assisting Suicide” by Burke J. Balch, J.D., and Randall K. O’Bannon, M.A. it is said that most people attempting suicide are conflicted.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? This case is an ethical dilemma because the psychologist is under the belief that the patient’s desire to end her life is not based her own welfare, but her children’s welfare.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is already legal in one state, and there are seven other states that imply a death with dignity statute. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, more than 4,000 doctors across the United States have approved of the assisted suicide law ("The Right to Die”). (“Death with Dignity Around the U.S.”). The law allows terminally ill patients who have been given six months or less to live and wish to hasten their deaths to obtain medication prescribed by two doctors. The most important thing to notice is that this law does not include those who have been on a life support system nor does it include those who have not voluntarily asked physicians to help them commit suicide.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been a heavily debated topic for more than 100 years. Critics and supporters, both have very strong opinions on the topic. Physician-assisted suicide, formerly known as active or voluntary euthanasia, is defined as purposely committing suicide with the aid of a physician (Fecio McDougall 1). The act is usually performed through a lethal dose of medication. The medication may be administered by the individual or someone other than the physician; however, the physician provides the patient with the means necessary to carry out the act (“Right to Die”).…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Supporters also ask why mercy killing is not legalized when murder in defense is taken into consideration by law (Naik, 2011). 1. The Patient’s right to self-determination. Patient empowerment has been a trend for more than twenty-five years. “it’s my life, my pain.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    End Of Life Care

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Objectives Upon completion of this power point presentation, the participants should be able to: Define the meaning of end of life care Determine the global challenges and innovation of end of life care Discuss the importance of advance directives and planning Distinguish palliative care from hospice care Identify the global role of physical therapy in addressing end of life care End of Life Care This sensitive subject, although heart wrenching, is vital to all decision makers to know (patient, legal next of kin, physicians) considering that it may affect the treatment decisions of all participants involved.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conclusively, a patient has rights and those rights need to be…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If people have the right to abort a pregnancy due to complications or simply because the pregnancy is unwanted, then a terminally ill person should have the right to end their agony. Why should one termination be frowned upon more than the others? By enacting the Death with Dignity law in every state, individuals are given a sense of control of their lives; furthermore, it gives them assurance that their love ones will not have to witness them…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays