Russell A. Potter in “Tupac’s Posthumous Live Tour,” makes copious claims leading to his argument: that holographic concerts by dead artists such as, Tupac Shakur isn’t a bright idea due to the fact that their presentation on the platform wouldn’t be genuine and overall it wouldn’t “have the complexity, or the humanity, to really compel our interests.” I disagree with Potter’s argument because a holographic concert by Tupac Shakur could potentially raise money for charity. For example, there was a holographic concert by Chief Keef on July 31st of this year, to raise money for a 13 year old boy who was run over by a car. Secondly, Tupac’s presence is kept alive and relevant. According to Rose Lilah, after Tupac’s appearance at Coachella, there
