• Home Page
  • Summary Of On Being An Atheist By H. J. Mccloskey

Summary Of On Being An Atheist By H. J. Mccloskey

Superior Essays
Show More
H.J. McCloskey conveyed an article called "On Being an Atheist," in the journal Question One. In his article, McCloskey makes a great degree connecting with illumination in why the conflict of God's existences misses the mark. This paper responds to McCloskey's conflicts by methods for a supernatural point of view.
McCloskey attempted to show that secularism is an extensive sum more sensible, and pleasing than confidence in higher forces. McCloskey uses "confirm" instead of "theory" to add misdirecting vitality to his dispute. There are countless thoughts that are recognized as a reality, yet can't be totally illustrated. Nothing can be exhibited 100%. They are essentially in perspective of a whole pack of thoughts that we know to be legitimate. This could be said …show more content…
McCloskey assumes that the conflicts he makes only can't present a barrier for the nearness of God.
McCloskey battled against the three magical confirmations, cosmological conflict, philosophical dispute, and the dispute from diagram. The Cumulative case that he shows takes the Cosmological,
Theological, and Moral Arguments and amasses them. The Cosmological case makes a claim for the nearness for God, the Theological case is the shrewd case, and the Moral case is morally incredible. All together, these present the Cumulative guard, which is a dispute of an individual, good and sharp producer of the universe. These three disputes tended to in this paper don't show God's quality autonomously, however together they reinforce each other for a to an extraordinary degree strong conflict. The fundamental conflict that McCloskey makes for God's essence is that of the Cosmological
Argument. The Cosmological Argument is the nearness of the universe and universe is the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Analysis
    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Analysis

    Response to McCloskey’s Article Shamyra Thompson Liberty University Introduction In the short article On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey discusses several arguments pertaining to the whether or no there is a God and what one believes to be evil. McCloskey also refers to the arguments as “proof” as well as implied several times that they can’t define or establish the existence of God. In the light of Foreman’s comments in regards to the question of God’s existence, I felt that he addressed the question by discussing the commonly asked question “Is there a God or if a God exist”. He also discussed what exactly is evil.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fine Tuned Universe Argument
    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fine Tuned Universe Argument

    In this paper I will analyze the argument of the “Fine-Tuned Universe”, describe what it means, show how an opponent would argue that intelligent design isn’t the best explanation, and also provide my own view on this argument from my theist view. Have you ever wondered how the universe got here? How everything perfectly fell into place, and how you’re here today? The Fine Tuned Universe argument may help you better understand. This argument is a version of the teleological argument, which is an argument for an intelligent creator, that basically suggests there are many very specific things that make life possible, and if any of these very specific things were to be altered, life as we know it would be highly unlikely to exist.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of The Problem Of Pain By C. S. Lewis
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of The Problem Of Pain By C. S. Lewis

    A common way of arguing against the existence or goodness of God is to present the problem of pain: “If God were good, He would wish to make His creatures perfectly happy, and if God were almighty He would be able to do what He wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God lacks either goodness, or power, or both” (The Problem of Pain 23). C.S. Lewis attempts to answer the intellectual question by first explaining the four components of religious development, then explaining the origin of the problem, and concluding with his answer.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Machellenberg's Sacrifice Argument
    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machellenberg's Sacrifice Argument

    (Cullison, 2010, p. 131) and these actions collectively outweigh individuals having “a personal relationship with God” (Cullison, 2010, p. 128). For Wielenberg and Cullison, “some of the greatest possible goods are only attainable in a naturalistic universe” (Cullison, 2010, p. 126). If God is hidden…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    In the mid-20th century, a renowned philosopher H.J. McCloskey wrote an attention-grabbing article called “On being and Atheist”. In McCloskey article, he argues on how the existences of God fails to be proven or sustained. The author argues that there is insufficient arguments to prove a theist belief while accrediting an atheistic point of view. The following essay is a response to McCloskey article from a different angle.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    McCloskey tempts the theists to look for answers and reasoning in a different way with his statement. In response, Evan and Manis say that the thrust of the non-temporal argument is that present existence of contingent objects requires that there be a necessary being” (Evans & Manis, 2009). As mentioned McCloskey claims that everything requires a cause for its existence; therefore God requires a cause for his existence. Evans and Manis discuss it this way, the argument assumes that all contingent beings require a cause for their existence; however, God is not a contingent being; only a self-existent or necessary being can qualify for the title of “God.” (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    Multiple times in the paper McCloskey refers to the arguments as “proofs” instead of theories. By substituting the word theory for proof in this article, he is trying to make every one who believes in theism, prove that their argument is the one hundred percent true. However nothing can be one hundred percent proven. In modern times there are several wildly accepted truths, but even those cannot be one hundred percent proven. No matter one…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ontological Argument By Philosopher St. Anselm Of Canterbury
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ontological Argument By Philosopher St. Anselm Of Canterbury

    The Ontological argument, written by philosopher St. Anselm of Canterbury in his book the Proslogion in the eleventh century, is a metaphysical argument for the existence of God in reality. In this essay I will discuss the validity of this argument. In this text Anselm states that the concept of God has the necessary and sufficient condition of being maximally perfect- ‘that than which a greater cannot be thought’- and that, since existing in reality is greater than existing only conceptually, God must exist in reality as well. Thus, if you understand the concept of God, you must agree that he is the greatest and that he exists, since these are written into the framework of the concept.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation
    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation

    The question being asked is does Samuel Clarkes cosmological argument succeed or fail? Through his reasoning, I believe that his argument succeeds. After some thorough consideration and advising I have found all of Clarks premises, which are the steps in his argument, valid and cannot be fully proven otherwise. Clarkes cosmological argument is as follows: (1) There exists either an unending chain solely of dependent beings or there also exists at least one independent being; (2)…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Three Approaches Of Creationism
    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Three Approaches Of Creationism

    In the beginning “In the beginning,” the famous first words of the most sold book in the world. The purpose of this literature review is not to enforce any of the beliefs on how the universe and it 's inhabitants came to be, but merely provide the evidence that both sides have used in order to defend the beliefs of each side. Creation Creationism, the perspective that the universe and all it 's inhabitants were created out of nothing by God (Triune God), or at least by an intelligent designer (ID). There are three approaches to creation, biblical creationism, scientific creationism, and scientific biblical creationism. In biblical creationism approach, the word of Bible is the sole source used to defend creation.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Mccloskey's Essay On Being An Atheist
    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Mccloskey's Essay On Being An Atheist

    McCloskey wrote a paper, “On Being an Atheist” in 1968. This paper was his way of trying to prove that there is no God. He compares a lot with atheist and theists ways of looking at how people believe in God and that he does not believe that there is a God with some of the ways that the world functions. An atheist is someone who does not believe, but he makes it seem like it is easier to be an atheist where he feels that theists are just miserable. He contends that theists really do not believe in the proofs, but turn to religion for other reasons.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?
    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings