• Home Page
  • Stronger Gun Laws Will Save Lives Summary

Stronger Gun Laws Will Save Lives Summary

Improved Essays
Show More
The article I read for the argument analysis project is titled “Stronger gun laws will save lives” by Christine Watkins. The broad issue about this article is there are loopholes allowing someone to purchase a handgun without documenting the transaction. According to the author that’s how many firearms end up being sold to felons or people who aren’t allowed to own firearms. The author’s research states that 400,000 gun crimes are committed every year. The broad issue in this article is many laws are trying to be passed in order to remove handguns off of the market. But is taking guns away or applying harsher laws for gun control going to make a difference? The author believes that by implying stricter gun laws, there will be less gun violence and crime. The author wants us to believe our current gun laws aren’t strict. …show more content…
The second persuasive point made is stronger gun laws will keep guns out of the wrong hands. In this article the author stated some supportive evidence “Because of this private sale loophole, convicted felons and other prohibited people are able to buy guns” this is logical because criminals find ways to obtain guns one way or another and “Studies have shown that a gun in the home increases the risk of firearm related death or injury” this logical because guns in a home increases the risk of an accident. The authors concluding idea is that they want gun control laws to be much more strict in terms of not just selling to anyone, but to also perform a background check and to make sure they are able to posses a gun legally and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Campus Carry
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Campus Carry

    He gives credit to the author by claiming that he provides “a very unique approach to the question of gun rights” (Hsiao). However, following that, he introduces several reasons which decreases the credibility of DeBrabander’s argument. Hsiao finds DeBrabander’s argument to be shallow as it fails to include empirical data which are very relevant to the debate, such as the “analyzed county level data from 1977 to 2000, [which] found annual reductions in murder rates between 1.5 % and 2.3 % for each additional year that a right to carry law is in effect” (Hsiao). Furthermore, he states that DeBrabander could have balanced the lack of empirical data with the inclusion of viewpoints of experts on this subject to add credibility. With these reasons, Hsiao’s entry answers the question of whether or not the evidences provided by DeBrabander are credible or not by claiming the evidences to be unreliable.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Should Gun Laws Be Allowed To Bear Arms Essay
    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should Gun Laws Be Allowed To Bear Arms Essay

    In order for gun control to be implemented, laws need to passed. Such laws would include mandatory background checks for the purchase of a firearm, a ban of handguns, or a ban of gun accessories like high capacity magazines and silencers. With the apparently recent rise of gun violence, some Americans blame guns and the lack of gun control for these acts of gun violence. Notably, gun control advocates argue that laws need to be implemented to prevent such atrocities; as there are many people who want gun control to implemented, there are just as many people who claim some of these laws are unconstitutional, ineffective and may only allow for more gun violence in the near future. Indeed, the implementation of Gun Control faces extreme opposition from flatlined gun violence rates, powerful lobby groups, the potential for guns to save lives, and the economic/social importance of guns.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Gun Control Act Of 1968
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Gun Control Act Of 1968

    Research done by John R Lott Jr has shown that gun control laws do not actually prevent crime, and states that allowed concealed carry and exhibited relaxed gun control laws saw drops in crime between the years of 1977 and 1992. This shows that when citizens are allowed to carry concealed guns crime rates become lower. This demonstrates that without gun control laws or bans in place, and with citizens being allowed to carry concealed guns, the rates of violent crimes have shown a decrease. This shows my thesis is correct because it has been proven that citizens who are allowed to carry guns, do in fact use them for self defense and protection, thus scaring off criminals and preventing further crimes from being…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Is Not Enough Analysis
    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun Control Is Not Enough Analysis

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do Gun Control Laws Decrease Gun-Related Violence?
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Do Gun Control Laws Decrease Gun-Related Violence?

    While some people are in favor of more strict gun control laws, these laws will not decrease gun related violence because background checks and public perception will not prevent crime. Background checks won’t reduce gun crime. More gun related crimes use stolen or illegally obtained guns. According to the article "The Background Check System Is Ineffective in Preventing Gun Violence. " background checks won’t…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Laura Carroll Backpacks Vs Briefcases Rhetorical Analysis
    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Laura Carroll Backpacks Vs Briefcases Rhetorical Analysis

    Laura Bolin Carroll is able to clearly persuade us of the importance of being able to have the skills of rhetorical analysis when being presented with rhetoric. In her text, “ Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis “, she relates to the audience by putting into words how we, as a society make quick analysis by making assumptions by appearance. You are quick to make conclusions about a person simply by how they present themselves. We have it engraved in our reasoning that a person’s appearance is a representation of their personality. As we continue to make these assumptions and conclusions, we begin to adjust to the amount of rhetoric information that is given to us through these encounters.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Jeff Mcmahan's Article Why Gun Control Isn T Enough
    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Jeff Mcmahan's Article Why Gun Control Isn T Enough

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control In The United States Research Paper
    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gun Control In The United States Research Paper

    And if it does, do laws that put restrictions on the ownership of guns reduce gun-related crimes? These are the questions that many of our representatives in Congress are asking themselves when they go about voting on gun control laws. The debate about gun control versus the right to bear arms is not new and has been here for many years and it still trudges on today. As seen through this paper, gun control is a complicated issue with many different points…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson Analysis
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson Analysis

    Analysis of “Just Take Away Their Guns” James Q. Wilson is a man who is very passionate about the issue of gun control. However, in his essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” that passion gets the best of him in what is decidedly a very biased and unsupported argument for the implementation of “stop-and-frisk” policies in place of more gun sale restrictions. While his claim that people need guns to defend themselves is at times convincing, he fails to provide enough evidence to convince his audience that police frisks will solve the issue of gun violence, instead just seemingly assuming that his solution is a better option than more gun legislation. That, along with his complete dismissal of gun-control advocates and his lack of consideration for…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Bad Idea
    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Bad Idea

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Jeff Mcmahan's Article: Why Gun Control Is Not Enough
    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Jeff Mcmahan's Article: Why Gun Control Is Not Enough

    He states their assumption as that which includes: that everyone’s overall safety will increase as more individuals own gums because it provides the people with a successful means of defense for themselves and others around them because the increase in the possibility of attacking armed victims decreases criminals’ disposition to attack. This, he says, does not provide logical evidence of a need for an increase in private gun ownership. The increase in the availability of private guns will only make the criminals who are already willing to attack more likely to be armed, and more likely to fire their weapons. The gun advocates, he advises, wrongly believe that a solution to this problem is to have more private citizens armed; however, as the perceived amount of safety increases so does the number of guns readily…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

    The accessibility of guns contributes to the popularity of their use. Because of the widespread use of guns, the government has begun to consider increasing the restrictions on gun ownership, through the installment of gun control laws. Gun control laws are set in place to discourage criminals or the mentally ill from owning a gun because it can be a danger to society. Yet, even with these laws, mass shootings have recently occurred…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Just Take Away Their Guns Analysis
    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just Take Away Their Guns Analysis

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentatives Of Gun Control
    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentatives Of Gun Control

    By tightening gun control laws, America can become a safe place for everyone and keeping guns out of the hands of people tempted to make bad choices. Tightening gun laws is essential for the US to save lives. These violent acts are getting worse; it shows…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Shelby's Speech Analysis
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Shelby's Speech Analysis

    A. Guns are meant for killing, this is the truest statement ever recorded. B. Gun rights began in 1791 when congress approved the second amendment, which states that “ the right or the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Bowman). For a century the amendment stood free until 1837 when Georgia tried to ban handguns which congress shut down. The time period between 1920 and 1990 the government was very busy regulating and trying to control guns ( Targeted News Service). Starting in 2007 (Bowman) massacre shooting became more and more popular, leading people to want to control guns rather than the people buying them.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings